Cited by 132Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and related disorders

Effects of modafinil on sustained attention performance and quality of life in OSA patients with residual sleepiness while being treated with nCPAP

Dinges, D·2003·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Background Some patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSA/HS) who are regular users of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) therapy continue to experience daytime sleepiness that impairs performance and quality of life. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted to determine the effect of modafinil on sustained attention performance and functional quality of life in OSA/HS patients with residual daytime sleepiness, who were regular users of nCPAP therapy. Methods Seventy-seven patients received modafinil (200 mg/day, week 1; 400 mg/day, weeks 2-4) and 80 patients received matching placebo once daily for 4 weeks. Sustained attention performance on the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) and functional status and quality of life using the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) were measured. Results The frequency of lapses of attention during PVT performance was significantly decreased, and both the median and slowest reaction times were significantly improved in patients receiving nCPAP plus modafinil compared with those receiving nCPAP plus placebo (P=0.010 for the number of lapses [transformed], P=0.023 for the median reaction time, and P=0.014 for the reciprocal of the 10% slowest reaction times). Treatment with nCPAP plus modafinil significantly improved the FOSQ total score (weeks 1 and 4), the vigilance subscale score (weeks 1 and 4), and the activity level subscale score (week 4) compared wi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1389-9457(03)00108-4

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dinges, D.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Dinges, D
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
393-402
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161061887
Cited by
132
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
modafinil, obstructive sleep apnea, residual daytime sleepiness, nasal continuous positive airway pressure, sustained attention, psychomotor vigilance task, reaction time, quality of life, functional outcome, adjunctive therapy
MeSH terms
Modafinil, Adult, Aged, Arousal, Attention, Benzhydryl Compounds, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Cavity, Psychomotor Performance, Quality of Life, Sleep, Sleep Stages, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review