Cited by 5Regulation of Appetite and ObesitySleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disorders

M-J-089 IMPACT OF SLEEP RESTRICTION ON THE REGULATION OF APPETITE IN MIDDLE-AGED OBESE SUBJECTS

Morselli, Lisa L., Balbo, Marcella, Van Cauter, Eve, Guyon, Aurore, Spiegel, Karine·2011·Sleep Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1389-9457(11)70169-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Middle-aged obese subjects ate 15% more calories during four to five nights of sleep restriction by 2-3 h/night than during sleep extension.

    “middle-aged obese subjects submitted to four to five nights of restriction or extension of their habitual sleep schedule by 2–3 h/night ate 15% more calories in the bedtime restriction condition [104]”

    From Sleep and metabolic function (2012) · cites this paper as [104]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morselli, L. L., Balbo, M., Van Cauter, E., Guyon, A., & Spiegel, K.
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
12
Pages
S46
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014576220
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
sleep restriction, appetite regulation, obesity, middle-aged adults, sleep deprivation, dietary intake

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review