Cited by 442Sustainable Development and Environmental PolicySustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessments

Evaluating the sustainability of complex socio-environmental systems. The MESMIS framework

Open access
López-Ridaura, S·2002·Ecological Indicators

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-160x(02)00043-2

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
López-Ridaura, S.
Venue
Ecological Indicators
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-11
Volume
2
Issue
1-2
Pages
135-148
ISSN
1470-160X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102725678
Cited by
442
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 23
FWCI
13.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecological Indicators (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Keywords
MESMIS framework, sustainability assessment, socio-environmental systems, natural resource management, sustainability indicators, multi-criteria decision making, participatory evaluation, sustainable development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review