The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pemigatinib for previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study
Open accessAbstract
Summary Background Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2 gene alterations are involved in the pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma. Pemigatinib is a selective, potent, oral inhibitor of FGFR1, 2, and 3. This study evaluated the safety and antitumour activity of pemigatinib in patients with previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with and without FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements. Methods In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm, multicohort, phase 2 study (FIGHT-202), patients aged 18 years or older with disease progression following at least one previous treatment and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2 recruited from 146 academic or community-based sitesin the USA, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia were assigned to one of three cohorts: patients with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, patients with other FGF/FGFR alterations, or patients with no FGF/FGFR alterations. All enrolled patients received a starting dose of 13·5 mg oral pemigatinib once daily (21-day cycle; 2 weeks on, 1 week off) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or physician decision. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response among those with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, assessed centrally in all patients who received at least one dose of pemigatinib. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02924376, and enrolment is completed. Findings Between Jan 17, 2017, and March 22, 2019, 146 patients were enrolled: 107 with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, 20 with other FGF/FGFR alterations, 18 with no FGF/FGFR alterations, and one with an undetermined FGF/FGFR alteration. The median follow-up was 17·8 months (IQR 11·6–21·3). 38 (35·5% [95% CI 26·5–45·4]) patients with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements achieved an objective response (three complete responses and 35 partial responses). Overall, hyperphosphataemia was the most common all-grade adverse event irrespective of cause(88 [60%] of 146 patients). 93 (64%) patients had a grade 3 or worse adverse event (irrespective of cause); the most frequent were hypophosphataemia (18 [12%]), arthralgia (nine [6%]), stomatitis (eight [5%]),hyponatraemia (eight [5%]), abdominal pain (seven [5%]), and fatigue (seven [5%]). 65 (45%) patients had serious adverse events;the most frequent were abdominal pain (seven [5%]), pyrexia (seven [5%]), cholangitis (five [3%]), and pleural effusion (five [3%]). Overall, 71 (49%) patients died during the study, most frequently because of disease progression (61 [42%]); no deaths were deemed to be treatment related. Interpretation These data support the therapeutic potential of pemigatinib in previously treated patients with cholangiocarcinoma who have FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements. Funding Incyte Corporation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Frampton, G. M., Fichtenholtz, A., Otto, G. A., Wang, K., Downing, S. R., He, J., Schnall-Levin, M., White, J., Sanford, E. M., An, P., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2696 · Cited by 2,157
Therapeutic potential of the endocrine fibroblast growth factors FGF19, FGF21 and FGF23
Degirolamo, C., Sabbà, C., & Moschetta, A. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2015.9 · Cited by 424
Nti, A. A., Serrano, L. W., Sandhu, H. S., Uyhazi, K. E., Edelstein, I. D., Zhou, E. J., Bowman, S., Song, D., Gangadhar, T. C., Schuchter, L. M., et al. (2019) · Retina · doi:10.1097/iae.0000000000002027 · Cited by 31
Cited by
Pascual, J., Attard, G., Bidard, F.-C., Curigliano, G., De Mattos-Arruda, L., Diehn, M., Italiano, A., Lindberg, J., Merker, J. D., Montagut, C., et al. (2022) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.520 · Cited by 783
Bertocchi, A., Carloni, S., Ravenda, P. S., Bertalot, G., Spadoni, I., Lo Cascio, A., Gandini, S., Lizier, M., Braga, D., Asnicar, F., et al. (2021) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2021.03.004 · Cited by 515
Harding, J. J., Fan, J., Oh, D.-Y., Choi, H. J., Kim, J. W., Chang, H.-M., Bao, L., Sun, H.-C., Macarulla, T., Xie, F., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00242-5 · Cited by 291
Self-citationRizzo, A., Ricci, A. D., & Brandi, G. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13030558 · Cited by 259
Nakachi, K., Ikeda, M., Konishi, M., Nomura, S., Katayama, H., Kataoka, T., Todaka, A., Yanagimoto, H., Morinaga, S., Kobayashi, S., et al. (2023) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02038-4 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Abou-Alfa, G. K., Sahai, V., Hollebecque, A., Vaccaro, G., Melisi, D., Al-Rajabi, R., Paulson, A. S., Borad, M. J., Gallinson, D., Murphy, A. G., Oh, D.-Y., Dotan, E., Catenacci, D. V., Van Cutsem, E., Ji, T., Lihou, C. F., Zhen, H., Féliz, L., & Vogel, A.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 671-684
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3010944770
- Cited by
- 1,611
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 190.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pemigatinib for previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30109-1
- The paper
- Abou-Alfa, G. K., Sahai, V., Hollebecque, A., Vaccaro, G., Melisi, D., Al-Rajabi, R., Paulson, A. S., Borad, M. J., Gallinson, D., Murphy, A. G., Oh, D.-Y., Dotan, E., Catenacci, D. V., Van Cutsem, E., Ji, T., Lihou, C. F., Zhen, H., Féliz, L., & Vogel, A. (2020). Pemigatinib for previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30109-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.