The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Networks, negotiations, and new times: the implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems1
Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249410 · Cited by 5,263
Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity
Law, J. (1992) · Systems Practice · doi:10.1007/bf01059830 · Cited by 3,244
Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces
Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.7.1.111 · Cited by 3,238
Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-1511 · Cited by 1,428
Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution?
Soh, C., Kien, S. S., & Tay-Yap, J. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/332051.332070 · Cited by 686
The ERP Revolution: Surviving vs. Thriving
Ross, J. W., & Vitale, M. R. (2000) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1023/a:1026500224101 · Cited by 472
Enterprise resource planning: multisite ERP implementations
Markus, M. L., Tanis, C., & van Fenema, P. C. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/332051.332068 · Cited by 377
A Selective Review of Time Assumptions in Strategy Research
Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259207 · Cited by 279
Cited by
10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211644 · Cited by 2,571
Self-citationBaird, A., & Maruping, L. M. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/15882 · Cited by 512
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): a review of the literature
Moon, Y. B. (2007) · International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1504/ijmed.2007.012679 · Cited by 328
From Artefacts to Infrastructures
Monteiro, E., Pollock, N., Hanseth, O., & Williams, R. (2013) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-012-9167-1 · Cited by 258
Cho, S., Mathiassen, L., & Nilsson, A. (2008) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2008.49 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, S. V., & Wagner, E. L.
- Venue
- Information and Organization
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 285-313
- ISSN
- 1471-7727 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011321673
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 26.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Networks, negotiations, and new times: the implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1471-7727(03)00012-5
- The paper
- Scott, S. V., & Wagner, E. L. (2003). Networks, negotiations, and new times: the implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration. Information and Organization. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1471-7727(03)00012-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
