Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Safety, immunogenicity, and preliminary clinical efficacy of a vaccine against extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in women with a history of recurrent urinary tract infection: a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1b trial

Huttner, Angela, Hatz, Christoph, van den Dobbelsteen, Germie, Abbanat, Darren, Hornacek, Alena, Frölich, Rahel, Dreyer, Anita M, Martin, Patricia, Davies, Todd, Fae, Kellen, van den Nieuwenhof, Ingrid, Thoelen, Stefan, de Vallière, Serge, Kuhn, Anette, Bernasconi, Enos, Viereck, Volker, Kavvadias, Tilemachos, Kling, Kerstin, Ryu, Gloria, Hülder, Tanja, Gröger, Sabine, Scheiner, David, Alaimo, Cristina, Harbarth, Stephan, Poolman, Jan, Fonck, Veronica Gambillara·2017·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND Escherichia coli infections are increasing worldwide in community and hospital settings. The E coli O-antigen is a promising vaccine target. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a bioconjugate vaccine containing the O-antigens of four E coli serotypes (ExPEC4V). METHODS In this multicentre phase 1b, first-in-human, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned (1:1) healthy adult women with a history of recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) to receive a single injection of either intramuscular ExPEC4V or placebo. The primary outcome was the incidence of adverse events among vaccine and placebo recipients throughout the study. Secondary outcomes included immunogenicity and antibody functionality, and the incidence of UTIs caused by E coli vaccine serotypes in each group. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02289794. FINDINGS Between Jan 20, 2014, and Aug 27, 2014, 93 women received target-dose ExPEC4V and 95 received placebo. The vaccine was well tolerated: no vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred. Overall, 56 (60%) target-dose vaccines and 47 (49%) placebo recipients experienced at least one adverse event that was possibly, probably, or certainly related to injection. Vaccination induced significant IgG responses for all serotypes: at day 30 compared with baseline, O1A titres were 4·6 times higher, O2 titres were 9·4 times higher, O6A titres were 4·9 times higher, and O25B titres were 5·9 times higher (overall p<0·0001). Immune responses persisted at 270 days but were lower than those at 30 days. Opsonophagocytic killing activity showed antibody functionality. No reduction in the incidence of UTIs with 103 or more colony-forming units per mL of vaccine-serotype E coli was noted in the vaccine compared with the placebo group (0·149 mean episodes vs 0·146 mean episodes; p=0·522). In post-hoc exploratory analyses of UTIs with higher bacterial counts (≥105 colony-forming units per mL), the number of vaccine serotype UTIs did not differ significantly between groups (0·046 mean episodes in the vaccine group vs 0·110 mean episodes in the placebo group; p=0·074). However, significantly fewer UTIs caused by E coli of any serotype were noted in the vaccine group compared with the placebo group (0·207 mean episodes vs 0·463 mean episodes; p=0·002). INTERPRETATION This tetravalent E coli bioconjugate vaccine candidate was well tolerated and elicited functional antibody responses against all vaccine serotypes. Phase 2 studies have been initiated to confirm these findings. FUNDING GlycoVaxyn, Janssen Vaccines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30108-1

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Huttner, A., Hatz, C., van den Dobbelsteen, G., Abbanat, D., Hornacek, A., Frölich, R., Dreyer, A. M., Martin, P., Davies, T., Fae, K., van den Nieuwenhof, I., Thoelen, S., de Vallière, S., Kuhn, A., Bernasconi, E., Viereck, V., Kavvadias, T., Kling, K., Ryu, G., Hülder, T., Gröger, S., Scheiner, D., Alaimo, C., Harbarth, S., Poolman, J., & Fonck, V. G.
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
528-537
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2590315902
Cited by
206
References
4
FWCI
15.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety, immunogenicity, and preliminary clinical efficacy of a vaccine against extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in women with a history of recurrent urinary tract infection: a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1b trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30108-1
The paper
Huttner, A., Hatz, C., van den Dobbelsteen, G., Abbanat, D., Hornacek, A., Frölich, R., Dreyer, A. M., Martin, P., Davies, T., Fae, K., van den Nieuwenhof, I., Thoelen, S., de Vallière, S., Kuhn, A., Bernasconi, E., Viereck, V., Kavvadias, T., Kling, K., Ryu, G., . . . Fonck, V. G. (2017). Safety, immunogenicity, and preliminary clinical efficacy of a vaccine against extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in women with a history of recurrent urinary tract infection: a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1b trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30108-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.