Cited by 419

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuroimaging correlates of pathologically defined subtypes of Alzheimer's disease: a case-control study

Whitwell, Jennifer L, Dickson, Dennis W, Murray, Melissa E, Weigand, Stephen D, Tosakulwong, Nirubol, Senjem, Matthew L, Knopman, David S, Boeve, Bradley F, Parisi, Joseph E, Petersen, Ronald C, Jack, Clifford R, Josephs, Keith A·2012·The Lancet Neurology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70200-4

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Whitwell, 2008, MRI correlates of neurofibrillary tangle pathology at autopsy: a voxel-based morphometry study, Neurology, 71, 743, 10.1212/01.wnl.0000324924.91351.7d · DOI · Paper page
  2. Jack, 2002, Antemortem MRI findings correlate with hippocampal neuropathology in typical aging and dementia, Neurology, 58, 750, 10.1212/WNL.58.5.750 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Gosche, 2002, Hippocampal volume as an index of Alzheimer neuropathology: findings from the Nun Study, Neurology, 58, 1476, 10.1212/WNL.58.10.1476 · DOI
  4. Csernansky, 2004, Correlations between antemortem hippocampal volume and postmortem neuropathology in AD subjects, Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 18, 190
  5. Hyman, 1997, Consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer disease from the National Institute on Aging and the Reagan Institute Working Group on diagnostic criteria for the neuropathological assessment of Alzheimer disease, J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 56, 1095, 10.1097/00005072-199710000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Petersen, 1990, Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's Disease Patient Registry, Aging (Milano), 2, 408
  7. Mirra, 1991, The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD): part II: standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer's disease, Neurology, 41, 479, 10.1212/WNL.41.4.479 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Knopman, 2003, Neuropathology of cognitively normal elderly, J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 62, 1087, 10.1093/jnen/62.11.1087 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Sled, 1998, A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data, IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 17, 87, 10.1109/42.668698 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ashburner, 2000, Voxel-based morphometry—the methods, Neuroimage, 11, 805, 10.1006/nimg.2000.0582 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Vemuri, 2008, Alzheimer's disease diagnosis in individual subjects using structural MR images: validation studies, Neuroimage, 39, 1186, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.073 · DOI
  12. Ashburner, 2005, Unified segmentation, Neuroimage, 26, 839, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Tzourio-Mazoyer, 2002, Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain, Neuroimage, 15, 273, 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Whitwell, 2011, Temporoparietal atrophy: a marker of AD pathology independent of clinical diagnosis, Neurobiol Aging, 32, 1531, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.10.012 · DOI
  15. Li, 2008, ROC analysis with multiple classes and multiple tests: methodology and its application in microarray studies, Biostatistics, 9, 566, 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm050 · DOI
  16. Galton, 2000, Atypical and typical presentations of Alzheimer's disease: a clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging and pathological study of 13 cases, Brain, 123, 484, 10.1093/brain/123.3.484 · DOI
  17. Josephs, 2008, Progressive aphasia secondary to Alzheimer disease vs FTLD pathology, Neurology, 70, 25, 10.1212/01.wnl.0000287073.12737.35 · DOI
  18. Lehmann, 2010, Reduced cortical thickness in the posterior cingulate gyrus is characteristic of both typical and atypical Alzheimer's disease, J Alzheimers Dis, 20, 587, 10.3233/JAD-2010-1401 · DOI
  19. Migliaccio, 2009, Clinical syndromes associated with posterior atrophy: early age at onset AD spectrum, Neurology, 73, 1571, 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c0d427 · DOI
  20. Licht, 2007, Cognitive differences between early- and late-onset Alzheimer's disease, Am J Alzheimer's Dis Other Demen, 22, 218, 10.1177/1533317506299156 · DOI
  21. Frisoni, 2005, Structural correlates of early and late onset Alzheimer's disease: voxel-based morphometric study, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 76, 112, 10.1136/jnnp.2003.029876 · DOI
  22. Ishii, 2005, Voxel-based morphometric comparison between early- and late-onset mild Alzheimer's disease and assessment of diagnostic performance of z score images, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 26, 333

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Whitwell, J. L., Dickson, D. W., Murray, M. E., Weigand, S. D., Tosakulwong, N., Senjem, M. L., Knopman, D. S., Boeve, B. F., Parisi, J. E., Petersen, R. C., Jack, C. R., & Josephs, K. A.
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
868-877
ISSN
1474-4422
Cited by
419
References
6
Language
en
Funders
National Institutes of Health (P50-AG016574, R01-AG011378, R21-AG038736, R01-AG037491)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review