Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 586

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consumers’ perceived risk: sources versus consequences

Lim, Nena·2003·Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
DOI 10.1016/s1567-4223(03)00025-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1567-4223(03)00025-5

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Bhattacherjee, 2000, Acceptance of e-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerages, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernetics A: Syst. Hum., 30, 411, 10.1109/3468.852435 · DOI
  2. T. Vu, P. Smith, T. Bennett, BizRate.com, NPD Joint survey reveals 75 percent of online customers are abandoning shopping cart, bizrate.com Press Release, 1999, http://www.bizrate.com/press/press_room/release_49.xpml (last visited: 24/4/2000).
  3. Salam, 1998, An investigation of consumer-perceived risk on electronic commerce transactions: The role of institutional trust and economic incentive in a social exchange framework, 335
  4. Mayer, 1995, An integrative model of organizational trust, Acad. Manage. Rev., 20, 709, 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Taylor, 1974, The role of risk in consumer behavior, J. Market., 38, 54, 10.2307/1250198 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cox, 1964, Perceived risk and consumer decision making—the case of telephone shopping, J. Market. Res., 1, 32, 10.2307/3150375 · DOI
  7. Dowling, 1994, A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity, J. Consumer Res., 21, 119, 10.1086/209386 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Verhage, 1990, Perceived risk: a cross-cultural phenomenon?, Int. J. Res. Market., 7, 297, 10.1016/0167-8116(90)90007-A · DOI
  9. Simpson, 1993, Perceived risk and mail order shopping for apparel, J. Consum. Studies Home Econom., 17, 377, 10.1111/j.1470-6431.1993.tb00180.x · DOI
  10. Spence, 1970, Perceived risk in mail-order and retail store buying, J. Market. Res., 7, 364, 10.2307/3150296 · DOI
  11. Van den Poel, 1996, Mail-order versus retail store buying—the role of perceived risk and risk reduction strategies, Int. Rev. Retail, Distribut. Consum. Res., 6, 351, 10.1080/09593969600000039 · DOI
  12. Arnum, 1995, Doing business on the Internet—a question of balance, Business Commun. Rev., 25, 35
  13. Ratnasingham, 1999, Implicit trust in the risk assessment process of EDI, Comput. Security, 18, 317, 10.1016/S0167-4048(99)80077-7 · DOI
  14. Fram, 1997, Internet shoppers: is there a surfer gender gap?, Direct Market., 59, 46
  15. Tan, 2000, Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking, J. Assoc. Informat. Syst., 1, 1
  16. Roselius, 1971, Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods, J. Market., 35, 56, 10.2307/1250565 · DOI · Paper page
  17. McCorkle, 1990, The role of perceived risk in mail order catalog shopping, J. Direct Market., 4, 26, 10.1002/dir.4000040406 · DOI
  18. Jarvenpaa, 1996, Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web, Int. J. Electronic Commerce, 1, 59, 10.1080/10864415.1996.11518283 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Nyshadham, 2000, Privacy policies of air travel web sites: a survey and analysis, J. Air Transport Manage., 6, 143, 10.1016/S0969-6997(00)00007-7 · DOI
  20. Darley, 1995, Gender differences in information processing strategies: an empirical test of the selectivity model in advertising response, J. Advert., 24, 41, 10.1080/00913367.1995.10673467 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Lutz, 1974, An exploration of the effects of perceived social and performance risk on consumer information acquisition, Adv. Consum. Res., 1, 393
  22. Liang, 1998, An empirical study on consumer acceptance of products in electronic markets: a transaction cost model, Decision Support Syst., 24, 29, 10.1016/S0167-9236(98)00061-X · DOI · Paper page
  23. Limayem, 2000, What makes consumers buy from Internet? A longitudinal study of online shopping, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernetics A: Syst. Hum., 30, 421, 10.1109/3468.852436 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Loh, 1998, The adoption of Internet-based stock trading: a conceptual framework and empirical results, J. Informat. Technol., 13, 81, 10.1080/026839698344873 · DOI
  25. Van den Poel, 1999, Consumer acceptance of the Internet as a channel of distribution, J. Business Res., 45, 249, 10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00236-1 · DOI
  26. Korgaonkar, 1999, A multivariate analysis of Web usage, J. Advert. Res., 39, 53
  27. Peter, 1976, An investigation of perceived risk at the brand level, J. Market. Res., 13, 184, 10.2307/3150856 · DOI
  28. Vellido, 1999, Segmentation of the on-line shopping market using neural networks, Expert Syst. Appl., 17, 303, 10.1016/S0957-4174(99)00042-1 · DOI
  29. H. Zampetakis, Digital Ids pave wireless web way, The Australian Financial Review, 8 April, 19, 2000.
  30. Gallaugher, 2002, E-commerce and the undulating distribution channel, Commun. ACM, 45, 89, 10.1145/514236.514240 · DOI
  31. Venkatesh, 2000, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies, Manage. Sci., 46, 186, 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Raijas, 2002, The consumer benefits and problems in the electronic grocery store, J. Retail. Consum. Services, 9, 107, 10.1016/S0969-6989(01)00024-8 · DOI
  33. Gemünden, 1985, Perceived risk and information search. A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence, Int. J. Res. Market., 2, 79, 10.1016/0167-8116(85)90026-6 · DOI
  34. Festervand, 1986, Influence of catalog versus store shopping and prior satisfaction on perceived risk, J. Acad. Market. Sci., 14, 28, 10.1007/BF02721813 · DOI
  35. Rose, 1999, Current technological impediments to business-to-consumer electronic commerce, Commun. Assoc. Informat. Syst., 1, 1
  36. Coombs, 1981, An evaluation of two alternative models for a theory of risk: part 1, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percep. Perform., 7, 1110, 10.1037/0096-1523.7.5.1110 · DOI
  37. Coombs, 1984, Conjoint design and analysis of the bilinear model: an application to judgements of risk, J. Mathematical Psychol., 28, 1, 10.1016/0022-2496(84)90018-X · DOI
  38. Pollatsek, 1970, A theory of risk, J. Mathematical Psychol., 7, 540, 10.1016/0022-2496(70)90039-8 · DOI
  39. Jia, 1999, Measures of perceived risk, Manage. Sci., 45, 519, 10.1287/mnsc.45.4.519 · DOI
  40. Bottomley, 1998, The role of prices in models of innovation diffusion, J. Forecast., 17, 539, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-131X(199812)17:7<539::AID-FOR684>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  41. Kwak, 2002, What products can be successfully promoted and sold via the Internet?, J. Advert. Res., 42, 23, 10.2501/JAR-42-1-23-38 · DOI

Cited by

See all 586

Metadata

Authors
Lim, N.
Venue
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
216-228
ISSN
1567-4223 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s1567-4223(03)00025-5
OpenAlex
W1966511947
Cited by
586
References
5
FWCI
18.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumers’ perceived risk: sources versus consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1567-4223(03)00025-5
The paper
Lim, N. (2003). Consumers’ perceived risk: sources versus consequences. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1567-4223(03)00025-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.