Cited by 347Hormonal Regulation and HypertensionBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesRenin-Angiotensin System Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endocrine and haemodynamic changes in resistant hypertension, and blood pressure responses to spironolactone or amiloride: the PATHWAY-2 mechanisms substudies

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the PATHWAY-2 study of resistant hypertension, spironolactone reduced blood pressure substantially more than conventional antihypertensive drugs. We did three substudies to assess the mechanisms underlying this superiority and the pathogenesis of resistant hypertension. METHODS: PATHWAY-2 was a randomised, double-blind crossover trial done at 14 UK primary and secondary care sites in 314 patients with resistant hypertension. Patients were given 12 weeks of once daily treatment with each of placebo, spironolactone 25-50 mg, bisoprolol 5-10 mg, and doxazosin 4-8 mg and the change in home systolic blood pressure was assessed as the primary outcome. In our three substudies, we assessed plasma aldosterone, renin, and aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) as predictors of home systolic blood pressure, and estimated prevalence of primary aldosteronism (substudy 1); assessed the effects of each drug in terms of thoracic fluid index, cardiac index, stroke index, and systemic vascular resistance at seven sites with haemodynamic monitoring facilities (substudy 2); and assessed the effect of amiloride 10-20 mg once daily on clinic systolic blood pressure during an optional 6-12 week open-label runout phase (substudy 3). The PATHWAY-2 trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2008-007149-30, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02369081. FINDINGS: =0·11, p=0·00024). 42 patients had low renin concentrations (predefined as the lowest tertile of plasma renin), of which 31 had a plasma aldosterone concentration greater than the mean value for all 126 patients (250 pmol/L). Thus, 31 (25% [95% CI 17-33]) of 126 patients were deemed to have inappropriately high aldosterone concentrations. Thoracic fluid content was reduced by 6·8% from baseline (95% CI 4·0 to 8·8; p<0·0001) with spironolactone, but not other treatments. Amiloride (10 mg once daily) reduced clinic systolic blood pressure by 20·4 mm Hg (95% CI 18·3-22·5), compared with a reduction of 18·3 mm Hg (16·2-20·5) with spironolactone (25 mg once daily). No serious adverse events were recorded, and adverse symptoms were not systematically recorded after the end of the double-blind treatment. Mean plasma potassium concentrations increased from 4·02 mmol/L (95% CI 3·95-4·08) on placebo to 4·50 (4·44-4·57) on amiloride (p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that resistant hypertension is commonly a salt-retaining state, most likely due to inappropriate aldosterone secretion. Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade by spironolactone overcomes the salt retention and resistance of hypertension to treatment. Amiloride seems to be as effective an antihypertensive as spironolactone, offering a substitute treatment for resistant hypertension. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation and UK National Institute for Health Research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-8587(18)30071-8

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 PATHWAY 2 study design Stages in the crossover trial at which measurements for the three mechanistic substudies were taken. Green shows substudy 1, blue shows substudy 2, and pink shows substudy 3. During the 12-week drug cycles, the lower dose was given for the first 6 weeks, then the higher dose was given for the second 6 weeks. No washout period was used between cycles. The figure shows one of the 24 possible passages through the drug cycles, the order of which was randomly assigned within blocks of 24 patients. A+C+D=an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, a calcium channel blocker, and a diuretic.
Figure 1 PATHWAY 2 study design Stages in the crossover trial at which measurements for the three mechanistic substudies were taken. Green shows substudy 1, blue shows substudy 2, and pink shows substudy 3. During the 12-week drug cycles, the lower dose was given for the first 6 weeks, then the higher dose was given for the second 6 weeks. No washout period was used between cycles. The figure shows one of the 24 possible passages through the drug cycles, the order of which was randomly assigned within blocks of 24 patients. A+C+D=an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, a calcium channel blocker, and a diuretic.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Participant numbers and measurements in the PATHWAY-2 mechanisms substudies
Figure 2 Participant numbers and measurements in the PATHWAY-2 mechanisms substudiesCC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Correlations of plasma aldosterone, renin, and ARR, with blood pressure response to spironolactone averaged (mean) across the 6-week and 12-week visits of each treatment cycle (A) Relation between baseline plasma renin, aldosterone, and the ARR and the home systolic blood pressure response to spironolactone. (B) Best-fit relation between plasma aldosterone and renin concentrations at baseline. Regression equations for change in systolic blood pressure (y): y=(−25·20)+6·86 × (log10renin), r2=0·116 (proportion of variance accounted for by the model); y=8·92–9·85 × (log10aldosterone), r2=0·034; and y=(−8·87)–6·87 × (log10ARR), r2=0·138. Regression equation for aldosterone vs renin: log10aldosterone=2·60–0·279 × (log10renin) + 0·081 × (log10renin)2, r2=0·043. ARR=aldosterone-to-renin ratio.
Figure 3 Correlations of plasma aldosterone, renin, and ARR, with blood pressure response to spironolactone averaged (mean) across the 6-week and 12-week visits of each treatment cycle (A) Relation between baseline plasma renin, aldosterone, and the ARR and the home systolic blood pressure response to spironolactone. (B) Best-fit relation between plasma aldosterone and renin concentrations at baseline. Regression equations for change in systolic blood pressure (y): y=(−25·20)+6·86 × (log10renin), r2=0·116 (proportion of variance accounted for by the model); y=8·92–9·85 × (log10aldosterone), r2=0·034; and y=(−8·87)–6·87 × (log10ARR), r2=0·138. Regression equation for aldosterone vs renin: log10aldosterone=2·60–0·279 × (log10renin) + 0·081 × (log10renin)2, r2=0·043. ARR=aldosterone-to-renin ratio.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Change in haemodynamic parameters from baseline after 12 weeks treatment with spironolactone, doxazosin, bisoprolol, and placebo Stroke index, cardiac index, vascular resistance index, and thoracic fluid index were measured at baseline and the end of each double-blind treatment cycle. Least squares means adjusted for gender, height, weight, smoking history, baseline systolic blood pressure, and the baseline measurement of the outcome, from a mixed model allowing for correlations between repeat measurements in each patient. Coloured bars show least squares mean values and black bars show 95% CIs.
Figure 4 Change in haemodynamic parameters from baseline after 12 weeks treatment with spironolactone, doxazosin, bisoprolol, and placebo Stroke index, cardiac index, vascular resistance index, and thoracic fluid index were measured at baseline and the end of each double-blind treatment cycle. Least squares means adjusted for gender, height, weight, smoking history, baseline systolic blood pressure, and the baseline measurement of the outcome, from a mixed model allowing for correlations between repeat measurements in each patient. Coloured bars show least squares mean values and black bars show 95% CIs.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Effect of placebo, amiloride, spironolactone, doxazosin, and bisoprolol on clinic blood pressure after 6 weeks of treatment Both amiloride and spironolactone reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure (unadjusted means) versus placebo (p<0·0001) and versus both doxazosin or bisoprolol (p<0·0001). The horizontal line at 140 mm Hg shows target clinic systolic blood pressure. Coloured bars show mean values and black bars show 95% CIs.
Figure 5 Effect of placebo, amiloride, spironolactone, doxazosin, and bisoprolol on clinic blood pressure after 6 weeks of treatment Both amiloride and spironolactone reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure (unadjusted means) versus placebo (p<0·0001) and versus both doxazosin or bisoprolol (p<0·0001). The horizontal line at 140 mm Hg shows target clinic systolic blood pressure. Coloured bars show mean values and black bars show 95% CIs.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Correlation between change in systolic blood pressure in patients treated with amiloride and in those treated with spironolactone after 6 weeks of treatment Dotted lines show corresponding points on y axis (for amiloride) and x axis (for spironolactone) for mean responses (red) and zero responses (blue).
Figure 6 Correlation between change in systolic blood pressure in patients treated with amiloride and in those treated with spironolactone after 6 weeks of treatment Dotted lines show corresponding points on y axis (for amiloride) and x axis (for spironolactone) for mean responses (red) and zero responses (blue).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Williams, B., MacDonald, T. M., Morant, S. V., Webb, D. J., Sever, P., McInnes, G. T., Ford, I., Cruickshank, J. K., Caulfield, M. J., Padmanabhan, S., Mackenzie, I. S., Salsbury, J., Brown, M. J., Balakrishnan, K., Burton, T., Cannon, J., Collier, D., Coughlan, C., D'Souza, R., Enobakhare, E., Findlay, E., Gardiner-Hill, C., Gupta, P., Helmy, J., Helmy, C., Hobbs, L., Hobbs, R., Hood, S., Iles, R., Kean, S., Kwok, S., Lacy, P., MacIntyre, I., Mackay, J., Markandu, N., Martin, U., McCallum, L., McCann, G., McGinnis, A., Melville, V, Muir, S., Myint, K., Nazir, S., Palmer, J., Papworth, R., Rutkowski, K., Saxena, M., Schumann, A., Soran, H., Stanley, A., Thom, S., Webb, A., White, C., Wilson, R., & Zak, A.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • The Queen's Medical Research Institute (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Brown, Morris J
  • Cannon, J
  • D'Souza, R
  • Helmy, J
  • Hobbs, R
  • Iles, R
  • Mackay, J
  • Markandu, N
  • Palmer, J
  • Papworth, R
  • Wilson, R
Venue
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
464-475
ISSN
2213-8587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2796868581
Cited by
347
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 14
FWCI
27.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • British Heart Foundation (SP/08/002)
  • NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
Keywords
resistant hypertension, spironolactone, amiloride, aldosterone, renin, aldosterone-renin ratio, primary aldosteronism, hemodynamics, systemic vascular resistance, bisoprolol, doxazosin, blood pressure response, low-renin hypertension
MeSH terms
Aldosterone, Amiloride, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Female, Hemodynamics, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Spironolactone, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Doxazosin, Bisoprolol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review