Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cholera epidemic in Yemen, 2016–18: an analysis of surveillance data

Open access
Camacho, Anton, Bouhenia, Malika, Alyusfi, Reema, Alkohlani, Abdulhakeem, Naji, Munna Abdulla Mohammed, de Radiguès, Xavier, Abubakar, Abdinasir M, Almoalmi, Abdulkareem, Seguin, Caroline, Sagrado, Maria Jose, Poncin, Marc, McRae, Melissa, Musoke, Mohammed, Rakesh, Ankur, Porten, Klaudia, Haskew, Christopher, Atkins, Katherine E, Eggo, Rosalind M, Azman, Andrew S, Broekhuijsen, Marije, Saatcioglu, Mehmet Akif, Pezzoli, Lorenzo, Quilici, Marie-Laure, Al-Mesbahy, Abdul Rahman, Zagaria, Nevio, Luquero, Francisco J·2018·The Lancet Global Health

Abstract

Background In war-torn Yemen, reports of confirmed cholera started in late September, 2016. The disease continues to plague Yemen today in what has become the largest documented cholera epidemic of modern times. We aimed to describe the key epidemiological features of this epidemic, including the drivers of cholera transmission during the outbreak. Methods The Yemen Health Authorities set up a national cholera surveillance system to collect information on suspected cholera cases presenting at health facilities. Individual variables included symptom onset date, age, severity of dehydration, and rapid diagnostic test result. Suspected cholera cases were confirmed by culture, and a subset of samples had additional phenotypic and genotypic analysis. We first conducted descriptive analyses at national and governorate levels. We divided the epidemic into three time periods: the first wave (Sept 28, 2016, to April 23, 2017), the increasing phase of the second wave (April 24, 2017, to July 2, 2017), and the decreasing phase of the second wave (July 3, 2017, to March 12, 2018). We reconstructed the changes in cholera transmission over time by estimating the instantaneous reproduction number, R t . Finally, we estimated the association between rainfall and the daily cholera incidence during the increasing phase of the second epidemic wave by fitting a spatiotemporal regression model. Findings From Sept 28, 2016, to March 12, 2018, 1 103 683 suspected cholera cases (attack rate 3·69%) and 2385 deaths (case fatality risk 0·22%) were reported countrywide. The epidemic consisted of two distinct waves with a surge in transmission in May, 2017, corresponding to a median R t of more than 2 in 13 of 23 governorates. Microbiological analyses suggested that the same Vibrio cholerae O1 Ogawa strain circulated in both waves. We found a positive, non-linear, association between weekly rainfall and suspected cholera incidence in the following 10 days; the relative risk of cholera after a weekly rainfall of 25 mm was 1·42 (95% CI 1·31–1·55) compared with a week without rain. Interpretation Our analysis suggests that the small first cholera epidemic wave seeded cholera across Yemen during the dry season. When the rains returned in April, 2017, they triggered widespread cholera transmission that led to the large second wave. These results suggest that cholera could resurge during the ongoing 2018 rainy season if transmission remains active. Therefore, health authorities and partners should immediately enhance current control efforts to mitigate the risk of a new cholera epidemic wave in Yemen. Funding Health Authorities of Yemen, WHO, and Médecins Sans Frontières.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30230-4

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Camacho, A., Bouhenia, M., Alyusfi, R., Alkohlani, A., Naji, M. A. M., de Radiguès, X., Abubakar, A. M., Almoalmi, A., Seguin, C., Sagrado, M. J., Poncin, M., McRae, M., Musoke, M., Rakesh, A., Porten, K., Haskew, C., Atkins, K. E., Eggo, R. M., Azman, A. S., Broekhuijsen, M., Saatcioglu, M. A., Pezzoli, L., Quilici, M.-L., Al-Mesbahy, A. R., Zagaria, N., & Luquero, F. J.
Venue
The Lancet Global Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
e680-e690
ISSN
2214-109X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799902886
Cited by
264
References
14
FWCI
25.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cholera epidemic in Yemen, 2016–18: an analysis of surveillance data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30230-4
The paper
Camacho, A., Bouhenia, M., Alyusfi, R., Alkohlani, A., Naji, M. A. M., de Radiguès, X., Abubakar, A. M., Almoalmi, A., Seguin, C., Sagrado, M. J., Poncin, M., McRae, M., Musoke, M., Rakesh, A., Porten, K., Haskew, C., Atkins, K. E., Eggo, R. M., Azman, A. S., . . . Luquero, F. J. (2018). Cholera epidemic in Yemen, 2016–18: an analysis of surveillance data. The Lancet Global Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30230-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.