Cited by 2Pain Management and Placebo EffectTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

DSM-III-R change in definition might have affected placebo response to antidepressants

Open access
Fountoulakis, Konstantinos N·2017·The Lancet Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30372-8

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fountoulakis, K. N.
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
21-22
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2561100050
Cited by
2
References
6
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2017: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
DSM-III-R, placebo response, antidepressants, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, trial heterogeneity, endogenous depression, antidepressant efficacy, trial design bias, publication bias, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, benzodiazepines, antipsychotic drugs
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Double-Blind Method, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review