Cited by 250Treatment of Major DepressionPain Management and Placebo EffectPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Is there a delay in the antidepressant effect? A meta-analysis

Posternak, Michael A., Zimmerman, Mark·2005·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives It has long been thought that there is a delay of several weeks before a true antidepressant effect occurs, although this theory has increasingly come into question. The goals of this meta-analysis were to determine whether significant drug-placebo separation occurs during the first 2 weeks of treatment and to ascertain whether the timing of response to antidepressant medication and placebo is distinct. Data sources Seventy-six double-blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted between 1981 and 2000, included in a recently published meta-analysis that evaluated placebo response rates in depressed outpatients, were reviewed. In addition, each issue of 6 psychiatric journals from January 1992 through December 2001 was reviewed. Study selection Forty-seven studies that evaluated antidepressant medications with established efficacy, performed weekly or biweekly (every other week) evaluations, and presented the time course of improvement as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression were included in our meta-analysis. Data synthesis The time course of improvement on active medication and placebo was nearly identical, as 60.2% and 61.6% of the improvement that occurred on active medication and placebo, respectively, took place during the first 2 weeks of treatment. Drug-placebo differences were not only present but were most pronounced during the first 2 weeks of treatment and diminished in a stepwise fashion thereafter. A series of subanalyses confirmed that th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v66n0201

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Factors contributing to rapid improvement may include medication effects (e.g., antidepressant, antipsychotic agents), removal of alcohol and substances, and psychotherapy gains.

    “Factors contributing to rapid improvement may include medication effects (e.g., antidepressant, antipsychotic agents) (Agid et al., 2003; Posternak and Zimmerman, 2005), removal of alcohol and substances, and psychotherapy gains (Stiles et al., 2003).”

    From Time in treatment: Examining mental illness trajectories across inpatient psychiatric treatment (2020) · cites this paper as Posternak and Zimmerman, 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Posternak, M. A., & Zimmerman, M.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2005-02-15
Volume
66
Issue
02
Pages
148-158
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089202379
Cited by
250
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
depression, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Humans, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Placebo Effect, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review