The DOI matches its Crossref record; 337 of the 339 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on psychological treatments research in tomorrow's science
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“greater precision in quantification of elements delivered, received, and applied could inform improvements to existing treatments (Holmes et al., 2018).”
From Measuring the active elements of cognitive-behavioral therapies (2023) · cites this paper as Holmes et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Notably, the threshold of engagement with the digital component that successfully facilitates the “non-digital target behaviour” can demonstrably vary between individuals [71], supporting a shift toward patient-treatment matching and person-centered care [72]”
From Experiences of Using Digital Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Rapid Scoping Review and Thematic Synthesis (2023) · cites this paper as [72]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Even when establishing statistical mediation, most studies fail to account for the temporal relationship between the mediator and outcome (Holmes et al., 2018).”
From Mediators of acceptance and mindfulness-based therapies for anxiety and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Holmes et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Understanding treatment mechanisms is critical to target treatments more efficiently: indeed, this goal has been identified as a priority for psychological treatment research in general (Holmes et al., 2018; Kazdin, 2007).”
From Intrusive memories of trauma: A target for research bridging cognitive science and its clinical application (2019) · cites this paper as Holmes et al., 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Assessment of negative or iatrogenic effects in psychological therapy is often neglected (Barlow, 2010; Holmes et al., 2018).”
From Intrusive memories of trauma: A target for research bridging cognitive science and its clinical application (2019) · cites this paper as Holmes et al., 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Internet-delivered psychological treatment may increase access to evidence-based care by reducing some of the barriers that exist in health care, such as limited therapist time, long waiting times for treatment, geographical inequalities in access to care, and inflexibility in when and where to access treatment (Holmes et al., 2018).”
From Effectiveness of and processes related to internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy for adolescents with anxiety disorders: a randomized controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as Holmes et al., 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As no validated risk of bias instrument exists for meta-analyses focusing on mediation, we extracted eight study quality criteria based on the recommendations of Holmes et al., 2018 and Kazdin, 2007: 1) Did the study register pre-defined hypotheses regarding mediators of the study?, 2) Did the study present a model of explanatory specificity?, 3) Did the study establish an effect of the therapy on”
From Mediators of acceptance and mindfulness-based therapies for anxiety and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Holmes et al., 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While the evidence is promising regarding the efficacy of acceptance and mindfulness-based therapies in treating anxiety and depressive disorders, knowledge about treatment mediators is an essential step in the optimization of treatments (Holmes et al., 2018; Kazdin & Blase, 2011).”
From Mediators of acceptance and mindfulness-based therapies for anxiety and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Holmes et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 · Cited by 20,391
Vos, T., Abajobir, A. A., Abate, K. H., Abbafati, C., Abbas, K. M., Abd-Allah, F., Abdulkader, R. S., Abdulle, A. M., Abebo, T. A., Abera, S. F., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32154-2 · Cited by 13,220
Kessler, R. C., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., & Walters, E. E. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617 · Cited by 12,052
Cognitive Therapy for Depression
(2012) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e675542012-001 · Cited by 9,678
Murray, C. J. L., Vos, T., Lozano, R., Naghavi, M., Flaxman, A. D., Michaud, C., Ezzati, M., Shibuya, K., Salomon, J. A., Abdalla, S., et al. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61689-4 · Cited by 8,888
Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M. P., Cane, J., & Wood, C. E. (2013) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6 · Cited by 7,629
Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.
Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.87.1.49 · Cited by 7,121
Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., Sanislow, C., & Wang, P. (2010) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379 · Cited by 7,067
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2011, Therapist-free therapy, The Economist, 398, 82
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Holmes, E. A., O'Connor, R. C., Perry, V. H., Tracey, I., Wessely, S., Arseneault, L., Ballard, C., Christensen, H., Cohen Silver, R., Everall, I., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30168-1 · Cited by 5,715
Self-citationMalhi, G. S., & Mann, J. J. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31948-2 · Cited by 4,099
The integrated motivational–volitional model of suicidal behaviour
O'Connor, R. C., & Kirtley, O. J. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0268 · Cited by 1,781
Self-citationPenninx, B. W., Pine, D. S., Holmes, E. A., & Reif, A. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00359-7 · Cited by 740
Self-citationToward clinical digital phenotyping: a timely opportunity to consider purpose, quality, and safety
Huckvale, K., Venkatesh, S., & Christensen, H. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0166-1 · Cited by 433
Metadata
- Authors
- Holmes, E. A., Ghaderi, A., Harmer, C. J., Ramchandani, P. G., Cuijpers, P., Morrison, A. P., Roiser, J. P., Bockting, C. L. H., O'Connor, R. C., Shafran, R., Moulds, M. L., & Craske, M. G.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Centre for Mental Health (GB)
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Holmes, Emily A
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-286
- ISSN
- 2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2789137369
- Cited by
- 624
- References
- 339
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 132 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 36
- FWCI
- 12.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Psychiatry (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX15AP57G)
- Wellcome Trust (101798/Z/13/Z)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH1014531, R34MH101359, R01MH100117, R01MH102274)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- psychological intervention, treatment implementation, treatment response heterogeneity, interdisciplinary collaboration
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health Services, Psychiatry, Research, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
