Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 402

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autoimmune psychosis: an international consensus on an approach to the diagnosis and management of psychosis of suspected autoimmune origin

Open access
Pollak, Thomas A, Lennox, Belinda R, Müller, Sabine, Benros, Michael E, Prüss, Harald, Tebartz van Elst, Ludger, Klein, Hans, Steiner, Johann, Frodl, Thomas, Bogerts, Bernhard, Tian, Li, Groc, Laurent, Hasan, Alkomiet, Baune, Bernhard T, Endres, Dominique, Haroon, Ebrahim, Yolken, Robert, Benedetti, Francesco, Halaris, Angelos, Meyer, Jeffrey H, Stassen, Hans, Leboyer, Marion, Fuchs, Dietmar, Otto, Markus, Brown, David A, Vincent, Angela, Najjar, Souhel, Bechter, Karl·2020·The Lancet Psychiatry
DOI 10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30290-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is increasing recognition in the neurological and psychiatric literature of patients with so-called isolated psychotic presentations (ie, with no, or minimal, neurological features) who have tested positive for neuronal autoantibodies (principally N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibodies) and who have responded to immunotherapies. Although these individuals are sometimes described as having atypical, mild, or attenuated forms of autoimmune encephalitis, some authors feel that that these cases are sufficiently different from typical autoimmune encephalitis to establish a new category of so-called autoimmune psychosis. We briefly review the background, discuss the existing evidence for a form of autoimmune psychosis, and propose a novel, conservative approach to the recognition of possible, probable, and definite autoimmune psychoses for use in psychiatric practice. We also outline the investigations required and the appropriate therapeutic approaches, both psychiatric and immunological, for probable and definite cases of autoimmune psychoses, and discuss the ethical issues posed by this challenging diagnostic category.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30290-1

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 402

Metadata

Authors
Pollak, T. A., Lennox, B. R., Müller, S., Benros, M. E., Prüss, H., Tebartz van Elst, L., Klein, H., Steiner, J., Frodl, T., Bogerts, B., Tian, L., Groc, L., Hasan, A., Baune, B. T., Endres, D., Haroon, E., Yolken, R., Benedetti, F., Halaris, A., Meyer, J. H., Stassen, H., Leboyer, M., Fuchs, D., Otto, M., Brown, D. A., Vincent, A., Najjar, S., & Bechter, K.
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
93-108
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30290-1
OpenAlex
W2981598129
Cited by
402
References
14
FWCI
27.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autoimmune psychosis: an international consensus on an approach to the diagnosis and management of psychosis of suspected autoimmune origin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30290-1
The paper
Pollak, T. A., Lennox, B. R., Müller, S., Benros, M. E., Prüss, H., Tebartz van Elst, L., Klein, H., Steiner, J., Frodl, T., Bogerts, B., Tian, L., Groc, L., Hasan, A., Baune, B. T., Endres, D., Haroon, E., Yolken, R., Benedetti, F., Halaris, A., . . . Bechter, K. (2020). Autoimmune psychosis: an international consensus on an approach to the diagnosis and management of psychosis of suspected autoimmune origin. The Lancet Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30290-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.