Cited by 37Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and Access

Effectiveness of primary care psychological therapy services for treating depression and anxiety in autistic adults in England: a retrospective, matched, observational cohort study of national health-care records

Open access
El Baou, Céline, Bell, Georgia, Saunders, Rob, Buckman, Joshua E J, Mandy, William, Dagnan, Dave, O'Nions, Elizabeth, Pender, Richard +5 more·2023·The Lancet Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Autistic adults report a higher prevalence of anxiety and depression than adults without identified autism but have poorer access to appropriate mental health care. Evidence-based psychological therapies are recommended in treatment guidelines for autistic adults, but no study has investigated their effectiveness in large samples representative of the autistic population accessing routine care. This study aimed to examine therapy outcomes for autistic adults in a primary care service. Methods In this retrospective, matched, observational cohort study of national health-care records, we used the MODIFY dataset that used linked electronic health-care records, including national data, for individuals who accessed psychological therapy in primary care in Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services in 211 clinical commissioning group areas in England, UK. All adults aged 18 years or older who had completed a course of IAPT in 2012–19 were eligible, and were propensity score matched (1:1) with a comparison group without identified autism. Exact matching was used, when possible, for a range of sociodemographic factors. Primary outcomes were routine metrics that have been nationally defined and used to evaluate IAPT treatments: reliable improvement, reliable recovery, and reliable deterioration. Secondary outcomes were calculated pre–post treatment changes in scores for Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment-7, and Work and Social Adjustment Scale measures. Subgroup analyses investigated differential effects across a range of sociodemographic factors. Findings Of 2 515 402 adults who completed at least two sessions of IAPT in 2012–19, 8761 had an autism diagnosis (5054 [57·7%] male and 3707 [42·3%] female) and 1 918 504 did not (631 606 [32·9%] male and 1 286 898 [67·0%] female). After propensity score matching, 8593 autistic individuals were matched with an individual in the comparison group. During IAPT treatment, symptoms of depression and generalised anxiety disorder decreased for most autistic adults, but symptoms were less likely to improve in the autism group than in the comparison group (4820 [56·1%] of 8593 autistic adults had reliable improvement vs 5304 [61·7%] of 8593 adults in the matched group; adjusted odds ratio [OR adj ] 0·75, 95% CI 0·70–0·80; p<0·0001) and symptoms were more likely to deteriorate (792 [9·2%] vs 619 [7·2%]; OR adj 1·34, 1·18–1·48; p<0·0001). In the comparison group, improved outcomes were associated with employment and belonging to a higher socioeconomic deprivation category, but this was not the case for autistic adults. Interpretation Evidence-based psychological therapy for depression or anxiety might be effective for autistic adults but less so than for adults without identified autism. Treatment moderators appear different for autistic individuals, so more research is needed to allow for better targeted and personalised care. Funding Alzheimer's Society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00291-2

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dissatisfaction with care, high levels of unmet needs, and harmful effects suggest that mental health services do not currently provide sufficient support for many autistic individuals with co-occurring mental health difficulties.

    “Dissatisfaction with care,9 high levels of unmet needs,10 and harmful effects11 suggest that mental health services do not currently provide sufficient support for many autistic individuals with co-occurring mental health difficulties.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Wakefield S, Kellett S, SimmondsBuckley M, Stockton D, Bradbury A, Delgadillo J. Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and metaanalysis of 10years of practicebased evidence. Br J Clin Psychol 2021; 60: 1-37.
  2. Arnold SRC, Uljarević M, Hwang YI, Richdale AL, Trollor JN, Lawson LP. Brief report: psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionaire9 (PHQ9) in autistic adults. J Autism Dev Disord 2020; 50: 2217-25.
  3. Clark DM. Realising the mass public benefit of evidencebased psychological therapies: the IAPT program. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2018; 14: 159-83.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El Baou, C., Bell, G., Saunders, R., Buckman, J. E. J., Mandy, W., Dagnan, D., O'Nions, E., Pender, R., Clements, H., Pilling, S., Richards, M., John, A., & Stott, J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • St Pancras Hospital (GB)
  • Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing (GB)
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
944-954
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388713661
Cited by
37
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (201292/Z/16/Z)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00019/1, MC_UU_00019/3, MC_UU_10019/1)
  • Alzheimer&apos;s Society (AS-PG-18–013)
  • University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autistic adults, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, psychotherapy, Improving Access to Psychological Therapies, primary care mental health services, treatment outcomes, PHQ-9, Work and Social Adjustment Scale, access to mental health care, England
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Autistic Disorder, Depression, England, Female, Humans, Male, Primary Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review