Cited by 162Digital Mental Health InterventionsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and Access

Practitioner review: Unguided and guided self-help interventions for common mental health disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Bennett, Sophie D., Cuijpers, Pim, Ebert, David Daniel, McKenzie Smith, Mhairi, Coughtrey, Anna E., Heyman, Isobel, Manzotti, Grazia, Shafran, Roz·2019·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Mental health problems are common in children and adolescents, yet evidence-based treatments are hard to access. Self-help interventions can increase such access. The aim of this paper was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of guided and unguided self-help for children and young people with symptoms of common mental health disorders. In contrast to previous reviews of self-help in children, all types of self-help and multiple mental health disorders were investigated in order to increase power to investigate potential moderators of efficacy. Importantly, studies with control arms as well as those comparing against traditional face-to-face treatments were included. Fifty studies (n = 3396 participants in self-help/guided self-help conditions) met the inclusion criteria. Results demonstrated a moderate positive effect size for guided and unguided self-help interventions when compared against a control group (n = 44; g = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.61, p < .01) and a small but significant negative effect size when compared to other therapies (n = 15; g = -0.17; 95% CI: -0.27 to -0.07, p < .01). Few potential moderators had a significant effect on outcome. Most comparisons resulted in significant heterogeneity and therefore results are interpreted with caution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.13010

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to a meta-analysis, for self-guided digital interventions to be efficient for youths, at least minimal support from a human therapist is needed.

    “Second, according to a meta-analysis, for self-guided digital interventions to be efficient for youths, at least minimal support from a human therapist is needed55.”

    From Use of automated conversational agents in improving young population mental health: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Meta-analysis section reports that all self-help subgroups, including unguided interventions, were more effective than controls; guidance was associated with larger effects, not shown to be necessary. The Discussion describes superiority of guided interventions as only potential, and the paper does not establish a minimum therapist-support requirement specifically for digital interventions. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reviews have tended to conclude that effects are better if there is some therapist input and if parents are involved, especially for younger children.

    “Importantly, reviews have tended to conclude that effects are better if there is some therapist input97 , 101 and if parents are involved especially for younger children.96 , 97”

    From Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19 (2020) · cites this paper as [101]

    The Meta-analysis section reports larger effects for guided than unguided self-help, although the difference was not significant when restricted to low-risk-of-bias studies. The Discussion suggests parental involvement may matter, particularly for younger children, but says the review could not test whether it was associated with effect size. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Smartphone-delivered interventions can be unguided (offering treatment without personal contact or individualized feedback) or guided (offering varying amounts of personal support).

    “Beyond this, interventions can be unguided, offering treatment without personal contact or individualized feedback, or guided, offering varying amounts of personal support (Andersson, 2018; Bennett et al., 2019).”

    From Smartphone-delivered mental health care interventions for refugees: A systematic review of the literature (2023) · cites this paper as Bennett et al., 2019

    The Introduction describes guided self-help as involving varying degrees of therapist input. The Discussion distinguishes guidance from other personal contact, such as emails encouraging adherence, so the paper does not establish that unguided interventions involve no personal contact; it also does not specifically address smartphone-delivered interventions. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These findings support the notion that therapist-guided online therapy and self-help materials are functionally distinct from one another.

    “These findings support the notion that therapist-guided online therapy and self-help materials are functionally distinct from one another [22].”

    From Efficacy of a six-week-long therapist-guided online therapy versus self-help internet-based therapy for COVID-19–induced anxiety and depression: Open-label, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial (2021) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Discussion reports better outcomes with support in some comparisons and some evidence of greater effect sizes for computerised interventions than for bibliotherapy or other self-help. These findings support distinctions by guidance and format, but the review does not directly establish that therapist-guided online therapy and self-help materials are functionally distinct. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Self-help interventions including bibliotherapy and computerized therapy have shown a moderate positive effect size compared to control groups, although they are generally less effective than face-to-face therapies.

    “Self-help interventions including bibliotherapy99 and computerized therapy100 have shown a moderate positive effect size when compared to control groups although they are generally less effective than face to face therapies.101”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Sterne, J.A.C., & Egger, M. (2011). High false positive rate for trim and fill method. Retrieved from https://www.bmj.com/ rapid-response/2011/10/28/high-false-positive-rate-trim- and-fill-method. [last accessed 11 December 2018].
  2. Keller, M.L. (2009). An internet cognitive-behavioral skills- based program for child anxiety. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
  3. McGrath, P.J., Lingley-Pottie, P., Thurston, C., MacLean, C., Cunningham, C., Waschbusch, D.A., . . . & Chaplin, W. (2011b). Telephone-based mental health interventions for child disruptive behavior or anxiety disorders: Randomized trials and overall analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 50, 1162-1172.
  4. Thirlwall, K., Cooper, P.J., Karalus, J., Voysey, M., Willetts, L., & Creswell, C. (2013b). Treatment of child anxiety disorders via guided parent-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy: Randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychi- atry, 203, 436-444.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennett, S. D., Cuijpers, P., Ebert, D. D., McKenzie Smith, M., Coughtrey, A. E., Heyman, I., Manzotti, G., & Shafran, R.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health London UK
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Bennett, Sophie D.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02-18
Volume
60
Issue
8
Pages
828-847
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2915432956
Cited by
162
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • University College London
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
self-help intervention, guided self-help, children and adolescents, common mental disorders, treatment efficacy, access to mental health care, treatment moderators
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Preschool, Humans, Self Care, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review