Cited by 254Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in Healthcare

Clinical applications of continual learning machine learning

Open access
Lee, Cecilia S, Lee, Aaron Y·2020·The Lancet Digital Health

Abstract

With advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in machine learning and deep learning, the potential uses for AI in medicine are growing. Continual learning, also known as lifelong learning or online machine learning, is a fundamental idea in machine learning in which models continuously learn and evolve based on the input of increasing amounts of data, while retaining previously learned knowledge.1 This dynamic process of supervised learning allows the model to incrementally learn and autonomously change its behaviour, while not forgetting the original task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30102-3

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systematic errors might also be reduced through continual learning, whereby an ML-based system is continuously updated through new data while retaining previously learned knowledge.

    “Systematic errors might also be reduced through continual learning11, whereby an ML-based system is continuously updated through new data while retaining previously learned knowledge12.”

    From Mitigating bias in machine learning for medicine (2021) · cites this paper as [12]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, C. S., & Lee, A. Y.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Aaron Y
Venue
The Lancet Digital Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
2
Issue
6
Pages
e279-e281
ISSN
2589-7500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3031989616
Cited by
254
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 13
FWCI
12.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health National Eye Institute (K23EY029246, R01AG060942)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
continual learning, lifelong learning, online machine learning, clinical application, incremental learning, artificial intelligence in healthcare
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Data Management, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Automated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review