Cited by 21Machine Learning in HealthcareDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningData Stream Mining Techniques

Continual learning of longitudinal health records

Open access
Armstrong, Jacob, Clifton, David A.·2022·2022 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI)

Abstract

Continual learning denotes machine learning methods which can adapt to new environments while retaining and reusing knowledge gained from past experiences. Such methods address two issues encountered by models in non-stationary environments: ungeneralisability to new data, and the catastrophic forgetting of previous knowledge during retraining. This is a pervasive problem in clinical settings where patient data exhibits covariate shift not only between populations, but also continuously over time. However, while continual learning methods have seen nascent success in the imaging domain, they have been little applied to the multi-variate sequential data characteristic of patient recordings. Here we evaluate a variety of continual learning methods on longitudinal ICU data in a series of representative healthcare scenarios. We find that while several methods mitigate short-term forgetting, domain shift remains a challenging problem over a large series of tasks, with only replay based methods achieving stable long-term performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/bhi56158.2022.9926878

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing methodologies like continual learning or transfer learning may present potential avenues for adaptation and personalization such as for electronic health record, but their exploration and application in mobile health remain relatively underdeveloped.

    “Although existing methodologies like continual learning or transfer learning may present potential avenues for adaptation and personalization such as for electronic health record [190], their exploration and application in the context of mobile health remain relatively underdeveloped.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [10][10] Ary L Goldberger, Luis AN Amaral, Leon Glass, Jeffrey M Hausdorff, Plamen Ch Ivanov, Roger G Mark, Joseph E Mietus, George B Moody, ChungKang Peng, and H Eugene Stanley. Physiobank, physiotoolkit, and physionet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. circulation , 101(23):e215-e220, 2000. -
  2. [36][36] S. Tang, P. Davarmanesh, Y. Song, D. Koutra, M. Sjoding, and J. Wiens. Mimic-iii and eicucrd: Feature representation by fiddle preprocessing (version 1.0.0). Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association , 27(12):1921-1934, 10 2020. -
  3. [37][37] Subhrajit Roy, Diana Mincu, Eric Loreaux, Anne Mottram, Ivan Protsyuk, Natalie Harris, Emily Xue, Jessica Schrouff, Hugh Montgomery, Ali Connell, et al. Multi-task prediction of organ dysfunction in the icu using sequential sub-network routing. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association , 28(9):1936-1946, 06 2021. -
  4. [41][41] Hugo Yèche, Rita Kuznetsova, Marc Zimmermann, Matthias Hüser, Xinrui Lyu, Martin Faltys, and Gunnar Ratsch. Hirid-icu-benchmark-a comprehensive machine learning benchmark on highresolution icu data. In Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 1) , 2021. -
  5. [42][42] Patrick J Thoral, Jan M Peppink, Ronald H Driessen, Eric JG Sijbrands, Erwin JO Kompanje, Lewis Kaplan, Heatherlee Bailey, Jozef Kesecioglu, Maurizio Cecconi, Matthew Churpek, et al. Sharing icu patient data responsibly under the society of critical care medicine/european society of intensive care medicine joint data science collaboration: The amsterdam university medical centers database (amsterdamumcdb) example. Critical care medicine , 49(6):e563, 2021. -
  6. [43][43] Vincenzo Lomonaco, Lorenzo Pellegrini, Andrea Cossu, Antonio Carta, Gabriele Graffieti, Tyler L Hayes, Matthias De Lange, Marc Masana, Jary Pomponi, Gido M van de Ven, et al. Avalanche: an endto-end library for continual learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 3600-3610, 2021. -
  7. [44][44] Idar Johan Brekke, Lars Håland Puntervoll, Peter Bank Pedersen, John Kellett, and Mikkel Brabrand. The value of vital sign trends in predicting and monitoring clinical deterioration: A systematic review. PloS one , 14(1):e0210875, 2019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armstrong, J., & Clifton, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
2022 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-09-27
Pages
01-06
ISSN
2641-3590 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4308390386
Cited by
21
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.90
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI ...) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/S02428X/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
Keywords
continual learning, catastrophic forgetting, longitudinal health records, covariate shift, domain shift, replay-based continual learning, non-stationary environments, machine learning in healthcare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review