Cited by 1,028Political Conflict and GovernanceNatural Resources and Economic DevelopmentTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

Horizontal Inequalities and Ethnonationalist Civil War: A Global Comparison

Open access
CEDERMAN, LARS-ERIK, WEIDMANN, NILS B., GLEDITSCH, KRISTIAN SKREDE·2011·American Political Science Review

Abstract

Contemporary research on civil war has largely dismissed the role of political and economic grievances, focusing instead on opportunities for conflict. However, these strong claims rest on questionable theoretical and empirical grounds. Whereas scholars have examined primarily the relationship between individual inequality and conflict, we argue that horizontal inequalities between politically relevant ethnic groups and states at large can promote ethnonationalist conflict. Extending the empirical scope to the entire world, this article introduces a new spatial method that combines our newly geocoded data on ethnic groups’ settlement areas with spatial wealth estimates. Based on these methodological advances, we find that, in highly unequal societies, both rich and poor groups fight more often than those groups whose wealth lies closer to the country average. Our results remain robust to a number of alternative sample definitions and specifications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0003055411000207

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using EPR's geocoded data, Cederman, Weidmann and Gleditsch (2011) show that ethnic groups that are poorer and richer than the country's average income are more likely to stage rebellion.

    “Using EPR's geocoded data on ethnic settlement areas, Cederman, Weidmann and Gleditsch (2011) extend the study of political exclusion to economic inequality, in order to show that ethnic groups that are poorer and richer than the country's average income are more likely to stage rebellion.”

    From Dynamics and Logics of Civil War (2017) · cites this paper as Cederman, Weidmann and Gleditsch (2011)

  • Resulting polarization might incentivize individuals or groups to seize political power by force to redistribute wealth, increasing the likelihood of conflict.

    “The resulting polarization might incentivize these individuals/groups to seize political power by force to redistribute wealth in their favor, thus increasing the likelihood of conflict (Cederman et al 2011, Guariso and Rogall 2017, Koubi 2017).”
  • Violations of norms of justice and equality will typically arouse feelings of anger and resentment among members of the disadvantaged group.

    “As Cederman et al. (2011, 481) argue, “Violations of norms of justice and equality will typically arouse feelings of anger and resentment among members of the disadvantaged group.””

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 99 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CEDERMAN, L.-E., WEIDMANN, N. B., & GLEDITSCH, K. S.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Essex (GB)
Corresponding author
  • CEDERMAN, LARS-ERIK
  • WEIDMANN, NILS B.
  • GLEDITSCH, KRISTIAN SKREDE
Venue
American Political Science Review
Published
2011-07-11
Volume
105
Issue
3
Pages
478-495
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
OpenAlex
W2122757622
Cited by
1,028
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 126 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 20
FWCI
185.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (acceptedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (180441, 105511)
  • European Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (105511, 116795)
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-062-23-, ES/E007147/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Keywords
horizontal inequality, ethnic conflict, ethnic groups, geocoded data, political grievances, economic grievances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review