Cited by 89Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceSocial Media and PoliticsMisinformation and Its Impacts

Technological Seduction and Self-Radicalization

Open access
ALFANO, MARK, CARTER, J. ADAM, CHEONG, MARC·2018·Journal of the American Philosophical Association

Abstract

Many scholars agree that the Internet plays a pivotal role in self-radicalization, which can lead to behaviors ranging from lone-wolf terrorism to participation in white nationalist rallies to mundane bigotry and voting for extremist candidates. However, the mechanisms by which the Internet facilitates self-radicalization are disputed; some fault the individuals who end up self-radicalized, while others lay the blame on the technology itself. In this paper, we explore the role played by technological design decisions in online self-radicalization in its myriad guises, encompassing extreme as well as more mundane forms. We begin by characterizing the phenomenon of technological seduction. Next, we distinguish between top-down seduction and bottom-up seduction. We then situate both forms of technological seduction within the theoretical model of dynamical systems theory. We conclude by articulating strategies for combating online self-radicalization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/apa.2018.27

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such path dependencies may have transformative effects, changing the preferences and values of the users themselves and leading to radicalization.

    “Such path dependencies may have transformative effects, changing the preferences and values of the users themselves and leading to radicalization”

    From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [127]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Levy, N. 2017. The bad news about fake news. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 6(8): 20-36.
  2. Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2012). Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  3. Thaler, Richard and Sunstein, Cass. 2003b. Libertarian Paternalism. The American Economic Review 93: 175-79.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ALFANO, M., CARTER, J. A., & CHEONG, M.
Affiliations
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
Venue
Journal of the American Philosophical Association
Published
2018
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
298-322
ISSN
  • 2053-4477 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-4485
OpenAlex
W2884858920
Cited by
89
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2
FWCI
15.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Philosophical Association (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
self-radicalization, technology design, online radicalization, dynamical systems theory, lone wolf terrorism, white nationalism, extremism, radicalization prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review