CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 123Language, Metaphor, and CognitionEmbodied and Extended CognitionCategorization, perception, and language

Grounding Language in Bodily States: The Case for Emotion

Glenberg, Arthur M., Havas, David, Becker, Raymond, Rinck, Mike·2005·Grounding Cognition
DOI 10.1017/cbo9780511499968.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

It has become increasingly clear over the past few years that the symbols used by language become meaningful through grounding. For example, Glenberg and Kaschak (2002) demonstrated that some linguistic constructions are grounded in literal action, and Pecher, Zeelenberg, and Barsalou (2003), as well as Stanfield and Zwaan (2001), showed how language is grounded in perceptual and imaginal states, respectively. In this chapter, we report initial results demonstrating how language may also be grounded in the bodily states that comprise emotions. We begin by discussing the logical and theoretical reasons for supposing that language is grounded in bodily states, and then we move to a brief review of the recent work demonstrating grounding in action and perceptual states. This introductory material is followed by the report of two experiments consistent with the claim that language about emotional states is more completely understood when those states are literally embodied during comprehension. WHY LANGUAGE MUST BE GROUNDED OUTSIDE THE LINGUISTIC SYSTEM To ask how a symbol is grounded is to ask how it becomes meaningful by mapping it onto something else that is already meaningful. One hypothesis is that linguistic symbols (e.g., words and syntactic constructions) become meaningful only when they are mapped to nonlinguistic experiences such as actions and perceptions. A second hypothesis is that linguistic symbols can be grounded in other linguistic symbols. For example, words are often defined in terms of other words: That is exactly how most dictionaries work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511499968.006

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grounding models in data other than linguistic descriptions of symptoms, such as objective behavioral or physiological signals, is another way of reducing variability in LLM performance, as words alone may not fully capture all of the necessary information to complete a given mental health task.

    “Grounding models in data other than linguistic descriptions of symptoms (eg, objective behavioral or physiological signals) is another way of reducing variability in LLM performance, as words alone may not fully capture all of the necessary information to complete a given mental health task [67].”

    From The Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Mental Health (2024) · cites this paper as [67]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Glenberg, A. M., Havas, D., Becker, R., & Rinck, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
ORCID
Glenberg, Arthur M.
Venue
Grounding Cognition
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Published
2005-01-10
Pages
115-128
DOI
10.1017/cbo9780511499968.006
OpenAlex
W1507779396
Cited by
123
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
15.38
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 1654 d)
Locations
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
language grounding, emotions, bodily states, embodied cognition, perceptual grounding, semantic representation, word meaning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review