The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research on Resilience: An Integrative Review
Abstract
The contributors to this volume have provided a wealth of information on children facing different life adversities, and in this concluding chapter we provide a distillation of two sets of themes. The first encompasses conceptual and methodological issues in studies of resilience – which, as defined in this book, is a process or phenomenon reflecting positive child adjustment despite conditions of risk. Since its inception a few decades ago, various commentaries have led to refinements in the research on resilience, yet several important issues have remained either unclear or controversial. The introductory chapter of this volume provides a succinct summary of this field at its initiation. In this chapter, we draw from the cutting-edge research presented throughout this book to clarify critical issues in studying resilience, with the ultimate goal of maximizing the contributions of future work on this construct. In turn, we consider (a) distinctions between the risk and resilience paradigms; (b) approaches to measuring adversity and competence; and (c) various concerns about protective and vulnerability factors, including the differences between them, issues about the specificity of effects, and the types of issues most usefully examined in future studies. Contrasting with the focus on empirical research in the first half of this chapter, the second half is focused on applied issues. At the heart of much resilience research is the desire to uncover salient protective and vulnerability processes that, if targeted in interventions, would substantially improve at-risk children's odds of doing well in life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward an experimental ecology of human development.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.32.7.513 · Cited by 10,853
The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00164 · Cited by 9,381
Self-citationOrdinary magic: Resilience processes in development.
Masten, A. S. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.227 · Cited by 8,497
(1996) · Cited by 6,884
Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms.
Rutter, M. (1987) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.1987.tb03541.x · Cited by 5,831
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.2.90 · Cited by 2,616
The construct of resilience: implications for interventions and social policies
LUTHAR, S. S., & CICCHETTI, D. (2000) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579400004156 · Cited by 2,374
Self-citationEquifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (1996) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579400007318 · Cited by 1,842
Enhancing relationships between children and teachers.
Pianta, R. C. (1999) · doi:10.1037/10314-000 · Cited by 1,782
The Study of Stress and Competence in Children: A Building Block for Developmental Psychopathology
Garmezy, N., Masten, A. S., & Tellegen, A. (1984) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1129837 · Cited by 1,640
Cited by
Ungar, M. (2011) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01067.x · Cited by 1,789
Davydov, D. M., Stewart, R., Ritchie, K., & Chaudieu, I. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.003 · Cited by 1,189
Brody, G. H., Chen, Y.-F., Murry, V. M., Ge, X., Simons, R. L., Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., & Cutrona, C. E. (2006) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00927.x · Cited by 712
Brown, K., & Westaway, E. (2011) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-052610-092905 · Cited by 700
Dray, J., Bowman, J., Campbell, E., Freund, M., Wolfenden, L., Hodder, R. K., McElwaine, K., Tremain, D., Bartlem, K., Bailey, J., et al. (2017) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2017.07.780 · Cited by 566
Metadata
- Authors
- Luthar, S. S., & Zelazo, L. B.
- Venue
- Resilience and Vulnerability
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2003-05-05
- Pages
- 510-550
- OpenAlex
- W2200045644
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 68.84
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research on Resilience: An Integrative Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511615788.023
- The paper
- Luthar, S. S., & Zelazo, L. B. (2003). Research on Resilience: An Integrative Review. Resilience and Vulnerability. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511615788.023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.