The DOI matches its Crossref record; 143 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The social construction of literacy
Abstract
Educational institutions, their promises and limitations were at the center of public debate for most of the twentieth century. Now in the twenty‐first century schooling continues to be seen as an institutional force both for bringing about social change and for providing stability. When outcomes are not as expected or when desired transformations do not come about, then the problems are seen as directly attributable to educational failure. Over the past hundred years of universal schooling, literacy rates have served as a barometer of society such that illiteracy takes on symbolic significance, reflecting any disappointment not only with the workings of the educational system, but with the society itself. An assumption often expressed is that if educational institutions cannot manage the simple task of teaching basic decoding and encoding skills, they cannot prepare future generations to deal with more complex questions of technological change (Kozol 1985). However, literacy needs to be seen as providing not just technical skills but also a set of prescriptions about using knowledge. In this sense literacy is a socially constructed phenomenon, not simply the ability to read and write. As this book demonstrates, by performing the tasks that make up literacy, we exercise socially approved and approvable talents. Literacy as socially constructed is both a historically based ideology and a collection of context‐bound communicative practices. An historical view of literacy begins in early modernity when literacy became regarded as a virtue, and some elements of such moral virtue still seem to attach to its use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
The social construction of reality : a treatise in the sociology of knowledge
Simpson, G., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091739 · Cited by 16,462
Wallace, A. F. C., & Garfinkel, H. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092245 · Cited by 12,445
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315836010 · Cited by 6,082
Toward a model of text comprehension and production.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.5.363 · Cited by 5,298
Literacy in Theory and Practice
Searle-Chatterjee, M., & Street, B. V. (1987) · Man · doi:10.2307/2802515 · Cited by 4,966
The Making of the English Working Class.
Smelser, N. J., & Thompson, E. P. (1966) · History and Theory · doi:10.2307/2504519 · Cited by 4,317
International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.
Duncan, O. D., & Sills, D. L. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092889 · Cited by 3,486
Cited by
Applications of Social Capital in Educational Literature: A Critical Synthesis
Dika, S. L., & Singh, K. (2002) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543072001031 · Cited by 955
(2006) · Cited by 752
Formative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-regulated Learning
Clark, I. (2012) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6 · Cited by 688
Chapter 4: Discourse Analysis, Learning, and Social Practice: A Methodological Study
Gee, J. P., & Green, J. L. (1998) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x023001119 · Cited by 586
Instructional Discourse, Student Engagement, and Literature Achievement
Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte199115462 · Cited by 551
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook‐gumperz, J.
- Venue
- The Social Construction of Literacy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2006-08-17
- Pages
- 1-18
- OpenAlex
- W2156174738
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 143
- FWCI
- 111.70
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The social construction of literacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511617454.002
- The paper
- Cook‐gumperz, J. (2006). The social construction of literacy. The Social Construction of Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511617454.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.