The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies
Abstract
Why do some governing parties limit their opportunistic behaviour and constrain the extraction of private gains from the state? This analysis of post-communist state reconstruction provides surprising answers to this fundamental question of party politics. Across the post-communist democracies, governing parties have opportunistically reconstructed the state - simultaneously exploiting it by extracting state resources and building new institutions that further such extraction. They enfeebled or delayed formal state institutions of monitoring and oversight, established new discretionary structures of state administration, and extracted enormous informal profits from the privatization of the communist economy. By examining how post-communist political parties rebuilt the state in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia, Grzymala-Busse explains how even opportunistic political parties will limit their corrupt behaviour and abuse of state resources when faced with strong political competition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Rational Theory of the Size of Government
Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261013 · Cited by 5,485
North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1989) · The Journal of Economic History · doi:10.1017/s0022050700009451 · Cited by 5,300
Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities
Kitschelt, H. (2000) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/001041400003300607 · Cited by 1,439
Cited by
What Wins Votes: Why Some Politicians Opt Out of Clientelism
Weitz‐Shapiro, R. (2012) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00578.x · Cited by 395
European Party Politics in Times of Crisis
(2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108652780 · Cited by 312
Democratic Backsliding, Populism, and Public Administration
Bauer, M. W., & Becker, S. (2020) · Perspectives on Public Management and Governance · doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvz026 · Cited by 307
Which Democracies Will Last? Coups, Incumbent Takeovers, and the Dynamic of Democratic Consolidation
Svolik, M. W. (2015) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123413000550 · Cited by 265
Access to Power Versus Exercise of Power Reconceptualizing the Quality of Democracy in Latin America
Mazzuca, S. L. (2010) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/s12116-010-9069-5 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Grzymala-Busse, A.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2007-04-09
- OpenAlex
- W4302575906
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.35
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511618819
- The paper
- Grzymala-Busse, A. (2007). Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511618819
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.