The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Abstract
In this 1992 book John Zaller develops a comprehensive theory to explain how people acquire political information from elites and the mass media and convert it into political preferences. Using numerous specific examples, Zaller applies this theory to the dynamics of public opinion on a broad range of subjects, including domestic and foreign policy, trust in government, racial equality, and presidential approval, as well as voting behaviour in U.S. House, Senate, and presidential elections. The thoery is constructed from four basic premises. The first is that individuals differ substantially in their attention to politics and therefore in their exposure to elite sources of political information. The second is that people react critically to political communication only to the extent that they are knowledgeable about political affairs. The third is that people rarely have fixed attitudes on specific issues; rather, they construct 'preference statements' on the fly as they confront each issue raised. The fourth is that, in constructing these statements, people make the greatest use of ideas that are, for various reasons, the most immediately salient to them. Zaller emphasizes the role of political elites in establishing the terms of political discourse in the mass media and the powerful effect of this framing of issues on the dynamics of mass opinion on any given issue over time.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An obvious concern is that political surveys, such as the ANES, prime people with highly partisan content, which then biases how they think about the other party (Zaller, 1992).”
From Measuring affective polarization: Matching concepts to measures (2026) · cites this paper as Zaller, 1992
In the citing paper
“El efecto perturbador de las redes sociales sobre el establecimiento de la agenda, por lo tanto, varía según los usuarios que procesan determinada información atrayendo la atención de sus amigos virtuales (Aruguete, 2016; Zaller, 1992).”
From #Tarifazo. Medios tradicionales y fusión de agenda en redes sociales (2018) · cites this paper as Zaller, 1992
In the citing paper
“In the field of political communication, individuals strongly interested in politics should therefore process political information more thoroughly than individuals less strongly interested in politics (e.g., Zaller, 1992).”
From The detection of political deepfakes (2022) · cites this paper as Zaller, 1992
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,030
McCann, J. A., & Domínguez, J. I. (1998) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/s0261-3794(98)00026-2 · Cited by 184
The “Race Card” Revisited: Assessing Racial Priming in Policy Contests
Huber, G. A., & Lapinski, J. S. (2006) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00192.x · Cited by 184
A Study of Presidential Campaign Event Effects from 1952 to 1992
Shaw, D. R. (1999) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2647509 · Cited by 180
Educating the Least Informed: Group Endorsements in a Grassroots Campaign
Arceneaux, K., & Kolodny, R. (2009) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00399.x · Cited by 183
Causal Complexity and the Study of Politics
Braumoeller, B. F. (2003) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpg012 · Cited by 181
Campbell, D. E., Green, J. C., & Layman, G. C. (2010) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00474.x · Cited by 183
“Candidates’ social group ties may influence partisan voting only if the party-group linkages are readily accessible to voters when they evaluate candidates (e.g., Sniderman, Brody, and Tetlock 1991; Zaller 1992).”
BackgroundDruckman, J. N. (2012) · Critical Review · doi:10.1080/08913811.2012.711022 · Cited by 194
Bleich, E., Bloemraad, I., & de Graauw, E. (2015) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2014.1002197 · Cited by 183
Vraga, E. K., Bode, L., & Troller‐Renfree, S. V. (2016) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2016.1150443 · Cited by 205
Carey, J. M., Clayton, K., Helmke, G., Nyhan, B. J., Sanders, M. S., & Stokes, S. C. (2020) · Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2020.1790577 · Cited by 193
Elite Communication and the Popular Legitimacy of International Organizations
Dellmuth, L., & Tallberg, J. (2020) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123419000620 · Cited by 200
“As a starting point, we consider the possibility that communication effects vary with the familiarity of IOs, based on the premise that citizens should be more susceptible to cueing on issues that are less familiar to them (Zaller 1992).”
InfluentialHuang, H. (2015) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123415000253 · Cited by 189
Wikipedia as a Data Source for Political Scientists: Accuracy and Completeness of Coverage
Brown, A. R. (2011) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096511000199 · Cited by 180
“To a large degree, we can probably expect that the same forces that make political topics “salient” to public opinion (cf. Zaller 1992) also make them likely to be addressed in Wikipedia.”
BackgroundA Developmental Model of Heterogeneous Economic Voting in New Democracies
Duch, R. M. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055400400080 · Cited by 182
Policy Uptake as Political Behavior: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act
LERMAN, A. E., SADIN, M. L., & TRACHTMAN, S. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055417000272 · Cited by 178
Artificial Intelligence and Democracy: A Conceptual Framework
Jungherr, A. M. (2023) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051231186353 · Cited by 263
Gervais, B. T. (2014) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.852640 · Cited by 181
Deep Interactions with MRP: Election Turnout and Voting Patterns Among Small Electoral Subgroups
Ghitza, Y., & Gelman, A. (2013) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12004 · Cited by 178
Hatemi, P., Hibbing, J. R., Medland, S. E., Keller, M. C., Alford, J. R., Smith, K. B., Martin, N. G., & Eaves, L. J. (2010) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00461.x · Cited by 182
DO THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES? PARTISAN DISAGREEMENT AS A CHALLENGE TO DEMOCRATIC COMPETENCE
Shapiro, R. Y., & Bloch‐Elkon, Y. (2008) · Critical Review · doi:10.1080/08913810802316373 · Cited by 178
News Media, Racial Perceptions, and Political Cognition
Domke, D., McCoy, K., & Torres, M. (1999) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365099026005003 · Cited by 179
Issue Importance as a Moderator of Framing Effects
Lecheler, S. K., de Vreese, C. H., & Slothuus, R. (2009) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650209333028 · Cited by 190
A Loss of Credibility: Patterns of Wrongdoing Among Nongovernmental Organizations
Gibelman, M., & Gelman, S. R. (2004) · VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11266-004-1237-7 · Cited by 180
“The press is neither benign nor neutral; its messages are a powerful force in influencing public opinion (Edelman, 1988; Zaller, 1992).”
BackgroundThe Effect of Economic Priorities on the Measurement of Value Change: New Experimental Evidence
Clarke, H. D., Kornberg, A., McIntyre, C., et al. (1999) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2585579 · Cited by 179
“Reflecting themes in recent theoretical analyses of the survey responses (see, e.g., Sniderman, 1993; Sniderman, Brody, and Tetlock 1991; Zaller 1992; Zaller and Feldman 1992), Clarke and Dutt (1991) and Clarke, Dutt, and Rapkin (1997a) contend that answers to the Euro-Barometer values battery…”
BackgroundPowers, D. V., & Cox, J. (1997) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2952078 · Cited by 178
Framing and the Public Agenda: Media Effects on the Importance of the Federal Budget Deficit
Jasperson, A. E., Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D., Faber, R. J., & Fan, D. P. (1998) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609809342366 · Cited by 178
Barnes, T. D., & Cassese, E. C. (2016) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912916675738 · Cited by 192
Coppock, A., Hill, S. J., & Vavreck, L. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc4046 · Cited by 171
Enhancing Civic Engagement: The Effect of Direct Democracy on Political Participation and Knowledge
Tolbert, C. J., McNeal, R., & Smith, D. A. (2003) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1177/153244000300300102 · Cited by 183
“From the pioneers of political surveys to contemporary researchers, scholars have found that by most standards, Americans possess little interest in or knowledge about politics (Converse 1964; Campbell et al. 1960; Delli Carpini and Keeter 1993; Zaller 1992).”
BackgroundThe more attacks, the more retweets: Trump’s and Clinton’s agenda setting on Twitter
Lee, J., & Xu, W. W. (2017) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.10.002 · Cited by 176
Newman, T. P., Nisbet, E. C., & Nisbet, M. C. (2018) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662518801170 · Cited by 194
Issue Framing and Engagement: Rhetorical Strategy in Public Policy Debates
Jerit, J. (2007) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9041-x · Cited by 175
“18 Although it is not the central focus of this study, people's political predispositions seemed to be filtering elite communications throughout the debate (Zaller 1992).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialBlank, J. M., & Shaw, D. R. (2015) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716214554756 · Cited by 179
Multidimensional government-citizen congruence and satisfaction with democracy
Stecker, C., & Tausendpfund, M. (2016) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12147 · Cited by 146
Layman, G. C., & Carsey, T. M. (2002) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1021820523983 · Cited by 174
Polarization and the Decline of the American Floating Voter
Smidt, C. D. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12218 · Cited by 174
Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union: Congruence or compensation?
Muñoz, J., Torcal, M., & Bonet, E. (2011) · European Union Politics · doi:10.1177/1465116511419250 · Cited by 173
Dixon, T. L. (2006) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750600690643 · Cited by 170
“Elective Affinities”: On the Psychological Bases of Left–Right Differences
Jost, J. T. (2009) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/10478400903028599 · Cited by 172
Reciprocal Effects: Toward a Theory of Mass Media Effects on Decision Makers
Kepplinger, H. M. (2007) · Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1081180x07299798 · Cited by 172
How to Evaluate It: The Role of Story-Evaluative Tone in Agenda Setting and Priming
Sheafer, T. (2006) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00327.x · Cited by 207
Stecula, D. A., & Merkley, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2019.00006 · Cited by 215
“A wide array of research on public opinion formation has shown such cues to be informative for citizens and persuasive on a wide range of issues (Zaller, 1992; Cohen, 2003; Berinsky, 2009), because both partisanship and negative partisanship form critical parts of their social identity (Green et…”
BackgroundInequality, Self-Interest, and Public Support for “Robin Hood” Tax Policies
Franko, W. W., Tolbert, C. J., & Witko, C. (2013) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912913485441 · Cited by 171
Josh Pasek, B., Stark, T., Krosnick, J. A., & Tompson, T. N. (2014) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.009 · Cited by 168
The Media and Interpersonal Communications: The Priming of Issues, Leaders, and Party Identification
Mendelsohn, M. (1996) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2960351 · Cited by 171
Barker, D. C., & Bearce, D. H. (2012) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912912442243 · Cited by 170
Devine, C. J. (2014) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-014-9280-6 · Cited by 185
Affective Polarization and the Populist Radical Right: Creating the Hating?
Harteveld, E., Mendoza, P., & Rooduijn, M. (2021) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2021.31 · Cited by 178
Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D. A., Stewart, M. C., & Whiteley, P. (2004) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/019924488x.003.0001 · Cited by 171
Bad Beliefs: Why They Happen to Good People
Schliesser, E. S. (2022) · International Studies in the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1080/02698595.2022.2119492 · Cited by 170
Partisans in Robes: Party Cues and Public Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions
Nicholson, S. P., & Hansford, T. G. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12091 · Cited by 166
The changing relationship between left–right ideology and euroscepticism, 1973–2010
van Elsas, E., & van der Brug, W. (2014) · European Union Politics · doi:10.1177/1465116514562918 · Cited by 172
Anti-intellectualism and the mass public’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Merkley, E., & Loewen, P. J. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01112-w · Cited by 185
The Social-Psychological Measurement of Partisanship
Greene, S. (2002) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1021859907145 · Cited by 172
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Johnson, B. K., & Westerwick, A. (2015) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12105 · Cited by 167
Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust
Johnson, B. B. (1999) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/136698799376763 · Cited by 167
Do People Really Become More Conservative as They Age?
Peterson, J. C., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2019) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/706889 · Cited by 165
Fear and Loathing in California: Contextual Threat and Political Sophistication Among Latino Voters
Pantoja, A. D., & Segura, G. M. (2003) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1025119724207 · Cited by 161
Healy, A., Persson, M., & Snowberg, E. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055417000314 · Cited by 167
Lying or Believing? Measuring Preference Falsification From a Political Purge in China
Jiang, J., & Yang, D.-L. L. (2016) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414015626450 · Cited by 142
“In an authoritarian context, a key determinant for developing unorthodox political beliefs is access to alternative sources of information about politics that helps the recipients resist and argue against the regime’s dominant discourse (Geddes & Zaller, 1989; Zaller, 1992).”
BackgroundGetting Real: The Duration of Framing Effects
Lecheler, S. K., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01580.x · Cited by 168
When Europe matters: The impact of political information on voting behaviour in EU referendums
HOBOLT, S. B. (2005) · Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/13689880500064635 · Cited by 166
Font, J., Wojcieszak, M., & Navarro, C. J. (2015) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12191 · Cited by 182
Is There a “Gender Affinity Effect” in American Politics?
Dolan, K. A. (2007) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912907307518 · Cited by 165
The Dynamics of Health Care Opinion, 2008–2010: Partisanship, Self-Interest, and Racial Resentment
Henderson, M., & Hillygus, D. S. (2011) · Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law · doi:10.1215/03616878-1460533 · Cited by 162
Applying the Theory of Affective Intelligence to Support for Authoritarian Policies and Parties
Marcus, G. E., Valentino, N. A., Vasilopoulos, P., & Foucault, M. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12571 · Cited by 186
“The “normal vote” model sees the public as responding to the current environment (Converse, 1966) and as largely driven by elite opinion (Zaller, 1992).”
BackgroundRepresentation and American Governing Institutions
Jones, B. D., Larsen‐Price, H. A., & Wilkerson, J. (2009) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s002238160809018x · Cited by 165
Mediated Politics and Citizenship in the Twenty-First Century
Graber, D. Α. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141550 · Cited by 169
Swyngedouw, M. (2001) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/s0261-3794(00)00010-x · Cited by 161
Kim, Y. M., & Vishak, J. (2008) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00388.x · Cited by 164
Rural Residence as a Determinant of Attitudes Toward US Immigration Policy
Fennelly, K., & Federico, C. M. (2008) · International Migration · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2008.00440.x · Cited by 164
Linking Genetics and Political Attitudes: Reconceptualizing Political Ideology
Smith, K. B., Oxley, D. R., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00821.x · Cited by 174
Spatial Proximity to the U.S.—Mexico Border and Newspaper Coverage of Immigration Issues
Branton, R. P., & Dunaway, J. (2008) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912908319252 · Cited by 163
Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire: How Fact-Checking Influences Citizens’ Reactions to Negative Advertising
Fridkin, K. L., Kenney, P. J., & Wintersieck, A. (2015) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.914613 · Cited by 166
Brader, T. A., Tucker, J. A., & Duell, D. (2012) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414012453452 · Cited by 168
Burnside, R., Miller, D. S., & Rivera, J. D. (2007) · Sociological Spectrum · doi:10.1080/02732170701534226 · Cited by 163
Chowanietz, C. (2010) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068809346073 · Cited by 163
Strömberg, D. (2015) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041101 · Cited by 221
Attitudes Toward Immigration: The Role of Personal Predispositions
Dinesen, P. T., Klemmensen, R., & Nørgaard, A. S. (2014) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12220 · Cited by 168
“Following Zaller (1992) and extant work on authoritarianism (Duckitt, 1989; Feldman, 2003; Feldman & Stenner, 1997; Lavine, Lodge, Polichak, & Taber, 2002; Oyamot, Fisher, Deason, & Political Psychology, Vol. xx, No. xx, 2014 doi: 10.1111/pops.12220 bs_bs_banner 1 0162-895X © 2014 International…”
BackgroundInfluentialReality Asserts Itself: Public Opinion on Iraq and the Elasticity of Reality
Baum, M. A., & Groeling, T. (2010) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818310000172 · Cited by 161
“…1992+ 10+ See Mueller 1973 and 1994; Gartner and Segura 2000; Gartner 2008; Feaver and Gelpi 2004; and Eichenberg 2005+ 11+ See Brody 1991; Zaller 1992 and 1994; Perla 2005; Berinsky 2007; and Larson 1996 and 2000+ 12+ See Zaller 1994; and Berinsky 2007+ 13+ Elsewhere ~Baum and Groeling…”
BackgroundUses and Abuses of Ideology in Political Psychology
Kalmoe, N. P. (2020) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12650 · Cited by 161
Brand Positioning Strategy Using Search Engine Marketing1
Dou, Lim, K. H., Su, Zhou, N., & , C. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721427 · Cited by 161
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820 · Cited by 227
Knoll, B. R., Redlawsk, D. P., & Sanborn, H. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9141-x · Cited by 157
“We would expect those who care more about an issue to be more affected by frames about it, as their existing mix of considerations on the issue is likely to be deeper (Zaller 1992).”
BackgroundInfluentialHow political parties frame European integration
Helbling, M., Hoeglinger, D., & Wüest, B. (2009) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01908.x · Cited by 169
Potter, S. J. (2007) · Journal of British Studies · doi:10.1086/515446 · Cited by 161
Elite Domination of Public Doubts About Climate Change (Not Evolution)
Tesler, M. (2017) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1380092 · Cited by 165
Does the platform matter? Social media and COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs in 17 countries
Theocharis, Y., Cardenal, A. S., Jin, S., Aalberg, T., Hopmann, D. N., Strömbäck, J., Castro, L., Esser, F., Aelst, P. V., de Vreese, C. H., et al. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448211045666 · Cited by 200
Armaly, M., Buckley, D. T., & Enders, A. M. (2022) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-021-09758-y · Cited by 184
Althaus, S. L., & Kim, Y. M. (2006) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00483.x · Cited by 160
Sulkin, T. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511616013 · Cited by 164
Interesting but irrelevant: Social capital and the saliency of politics in Western Europe
van Deth, J. W. (2000) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00507 · Cited by 206
Learning Together Slowly: Bayesian Learning about Political Facts
Hill, S. J. (2017) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/692739 · Cited by 159
Political Sophistication and Policy Reasoning: A Reconsideration
Goren, P. (2004) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00081.x · Cited by 159
A Loss of Faith: The Sources of Reduced Political Legitimacy for the American Medical Profession
Schlesinger, M. J. (2002) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00010 · Cited by 159
Explaining the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge
Lizotte, M., & Sidman, A. H. (2009) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x09000130 · Cited by 168
“As a measure of political sophistication, political knowledge scales have been included as dependent, independent, and moderating variables (Delli Carpini and Keeter 1996; Goren 1997; Neuman 1986; Pettey 1988; Price and Zaller 1993; Verba, Burns, and Schlozman 1997; Zaller 1990, 1992).”
BackgroundTaber, C. S., & Lodge, M. G. (2016) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12321 · Cited by 174
Bullock, J. G., & Lenz, G. (2019) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-050904 · Cited by 165
Disenchanted or Discerning: Voter Turnout in Post-Communist Countries
Pacek, A. C., Pop-Elecheș, G., & Tucker, J. A. (2009) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381609090409 · Cited by 159
Two-level games and bargaining outcomes: whygaiatsusucceeds in Japan in some cases but not others
Schoppa, L. J. (1993) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300027995 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Zaller, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zaller, John R.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1992-08-28
- OpenAlex
- W4300170376
- Cited by
- 7,785
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 392 · 2025: 487 · 2024: 402 · 2023: 360 · 2022: 461 · 2021: 456 · 2020: 483 · 2019: 463 · 2018: 381 · 2017: 353 · 2016: 297 · 2015: 306 · 2014: 283 · 2013: 248 · 2012: 287
- FWCI
- 89.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- mass opinion, political information acquisition, political elites, mass media, political preferences, public opinion dynamics, political attention, political knowledge, salience, framing effects, political discourse, public trust in government, racial equality, presidential approval, voting behavior, United States elections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review