The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Abstract
In this 1992 book John Zaller develops a comprehensive theory to explain how people acquire political information from elites and the mass media and convert it into political preferences. Using numerous specific examples, Zaller applies this theory to the dynamics of public opinion on a broad range of subjects, including domestic and foreign policy, trust in government, racial equality, and presidential approval, as well as voting behaviour in U.S. House, Senate, and presidential elections. The thoery is constructed from four basic premises. The first is that individuals differ substantially in their attention to politics and therefore in their exposure to elite sources of political information. The second is that people react critically to political communication only to the extent that they are knowledgeable about political affairs. The third is that people rarely have fixed attitudes on specific issues; rather, they construct 'preference statements' on the fly as they confront each issue raised. The fourth is that, in constructing these statements, people make the greatest use of ideas that are, for various reasons, the most immediately salient to them. Zaller emphasizes the role of political elites in establishing the terms of political discourse in the mass media and the powerful effect of this framing of issues on the dynamics of mass opinion on any given issue over time.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An obvious concern is that political surveys, such as the ANES, prime people with highly partisan content, which then biases how they think about the other party (Zaller, 1992).”
From Measuring affective polarization: Matching concepts to measures (2026) · cites this paper as Zaller, 1992
In the citing paper
“El efecto perturbador de las redes sociales sobre el establecimiento de la agenda, por lo tanto, varía según los usuarios que procesan determinada información atrayendo la atención de sus amigos virtuales (Aruguete, 2016; Zaller, 1992).”
From #Tarifazo. Medios tradicionales y fusión de agenda en redes sociales (2018) · cites this paper as Zaller, 1992
In the citing paper
“In the field of political communication, individuals strongly interested in politics should therefore process political information more thoroughly than individuals less strongly interested in politics (e.g., Zaller, 1992).”
From The detection of political deepfakes (2022) · cites this paper as Zaller, 1992
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,030
Pickup, M. A., Stecula, D. A., & van der Linden, C. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0008423920000463 · Cited by 107
“Public opinion is shaped, to a large extent, by political elites (Lenz, 2012; Zaller, 1992).”
BackgroundValue Conflict, Group Affect, and the Issue of Campaign Finance
Grant, J. T., & Rudolph, T. J. (2003) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00033 · Cited by 107
FDR to Clinton, Mueller to?: A Field Essay on Presidential Approval
Gronke, P. W., & Newman, B. (2003) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106591290305600411 · Cited by 107
Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hatemi, P., Eaves, L. J., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00560.x · Cited by 102
Infotainment, cynicism and democracy: The effects of privatization vs personalization in the news
Jebril, N., Albæk, E., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013) · European Journal of Communication · doi:10.1177/0267323112468683 · Cited by 106
Does Belgium (still) exist? Differences in political culture between Flemings and Walloons
Billiet, J., Maddens, B., & Frognier, A.-P. (2006) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402380600968802 · Cited by 106
Racial Sympathy and Its Political Consequences
Chudy, J. (2020) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/708953 · Cited by 104
Desmarais, B. A., Raja, R. J. L., & Kowal, M. S. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12106 · Cited by 103
Fleeting, Fading, or Far-Reaching? A Knowledge-Based Model of the Persistence of Framing Effects
Baden, C., & Lecheler, S. K. (2012) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01413.x · Cited by 103
Druckman, J. N., Kuklinski, J. H., & Sigelman, L. (2009) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-009-9092-2 · Cited by 105
What a Difference a Day Makes? The Effects of Repetitive and Competitive News Framing Over Time
Lecheler, S. K., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650212470688 · Cited by 120
An Effective Approach to the Repeated Cross‐Sectional Design
Lebo, M. J., & Weber, C. R. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12095 · Cited by 111
Investigating Journalist Influences on Political Issue Agendas at Westminster
Davis, A. (2007) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584600701313033 · Cited by 104
Elite Cues and Citizen Disagreement with Expert Opinion
Darmofal, D. (2005) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106591290505800302 · Cited by 106
Gollust, S. E., & Lynch, J. F. (2011) · Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law · doi:10.1215/03616878-1460578 · Cited by 110
A changing climate of skepticism: The factors shaping climate change coverage in the US press
Schmid-Petri, H., Adam, S., Schmucki, I., & Häußler, T. (2015) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662515612276 · Cited by 120
An Insider–Outsider Theory of Popular Tolerance for Corrupt Politicians
Chang, E. C. C., & Kerr, N. (2016) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.12193 · Cited by 104
What Causes People to Change Their Opinion about Climate Change?
Palm, R. I., Lewis, G. B., & Feng, B. (2017) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2016.1270193 · Cited by 102
Bleck, J., & Michelitch, K. G. (2017) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/690616 · Cited by 103
How Political Parties Use Group-Based Appeals: Evidence from Britain 1964–2015
Thau, M. (2017) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321717744495 · Cited by 100
The COVID-19 Pandemic, International Cooperation, and Populism
Pevehouse, J. C. W. (2020) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818320000399 · Cited by 110
Audience Beliefs and International Organization Legitimacy
Chapman, T. L. (2009) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818309990154 · Cited by 102
“…2004+ 77+ Baker and Oneal 2001+ 78+ Brecher, Wilkenfeld, and Moser 1988, 123–27+ 79+ See Baker and Oneal 2001; and Baum 2004+ 80+ See Aldrich, Sullivan, and Borgida 1989; Zaller 1992; and Baum 2002+ 81+ See Baker and Oneal 2001; and Colaresi 2007+ informational role as international…”
BackgroundElectoral Competitiveness and Issue Voting
Lachat, R. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9151-8 · Cited by 110
From Mass Preferences to Policy
Canes‐Wrone, B. (2015) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050311-165552 · Cited by 105
Core Political Values and the Long-Term Shaping of Partisanship
Evans, G., & Neundorf, A. (2018) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123418000339 · Cited by 119
“In comparison with uninformed voters, politically aware citizens are more interested in politics, follow debates, and are more likely to update their partisanship in line with their values (Sniderman and Stiglitz 2012; Zaller 1992).”
Rawlings, C. M., & Childress, C. (2019) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/703203 · Cited by 104
Presidential Campaigns and the Knowledge Gap
Holbrook, T. M. (2002) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584600290109997 · Cited by 103
Larsen, C. A., & Dejgaard, T. E. (2013) · Journal of European Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0958928713480068 · Cited by 111
The Ideological Asymmetry of the American Party System
Yphtach Lelkes, B., & Sniderman, P. M. (2014) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123414000404 · Cited by 101
“3 Feldman and Zaller 1992.”
BackgroundMethodLaustsen, L., & Petersen, M. B. (2015) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1050565 · Cited by 103
Mini-publics and Public Opinion: Two Survey-Based Experiments
Boulianne, S. (2017) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321717723507 · Cited by 101
“Zaller (1992) attributes the success of endorsement effects to a citizenry with relatively undeveloped and unsophisticated political views.”
BackgroundRisk Orientation, Risk Exposure, and Policy Opinions: The Case of Free Trade
Ehrlich, S. D., & Maestas, C. D. (2010) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00774.x · Cited by 105
Gelpi, C. F., Reifler, J., & Feaver, P. D. (2007) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9029-6 · Cited by 102
Dixon, T. L. (2007) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213260701375660 · Cited by 102
Persuasion: Empirical Evidence
DellaVigna, S., & Gentzkow, M. A. (2009) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w15298 · Cited by 106
Who Knows Best? Education, Partisanship, and Contested Facts
Joslyn, M. R., & Haider‐Markel, D. P. (2014) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/polp.12098 · Cited by 100
Pykett, J., Saward, M., & Schaefer, A. (2010) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1111/j.1467-856x.2010.00424.x · Cited by 101
Listening to the Government: How Information Shapes Responsibility Attributions
HOBOLT, S. B., Tilley, J. R., & Wittrock, J. N. (2011) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9183-8 · Cited by 101
“While we expect individuals to be responsive to new information, their judgments are also likely to be mediated by their predispositions (Zaller 1992).”
BackgroundNot by the Sword Alone: Soft Power, Mass Media, and the Production of State Sovereignty
Warren, T. C. (2014) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818313000350 · Cited by 111
Asking About Numbers: Why and How
Ansolabehere, S. D., Meredith, M., & Snowberg, E. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mps031 · Cited by 102
Bassan‐Nygate, L., & WEISS, C. M. (2021) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140211024283 · Cited by 106
Stability and change in political trust: Evidence and implications from six panel studies
Devine, D., & Valgarðsson, V. O. (2023) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12606 · Cited by 101
Racial Cues and Political Ideology
Domke, D. (2001) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365001028006003 · Cited by 101
Berinsky, A. J., & Druckman, J. N. (2007) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfl049 · Cited by 101
Schuessler, A. A. (2000) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/104346300012001005 · Cited by 104
Eaves, L. J., & Hatemi, P. (2008) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-008-9205-4 · Cited by 102
Bruycker, I. D. (2017) · European Union Politics · doi:10.1177/1465116517715525 · Cited by 100
“However, this finding could also mean that elites manipulate the salience of an issue by openly appealing to public interests (Zaller, 1992).”
Extra-judicial Actor Induced Change in Supreme Court Legitimacy
Armaly, M. (2017) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912917750278 · Cited by 99
Siegel, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.005 · Cited by 123
Vraga, E. K., Tully, M., & Bode, L. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444821998691 · Cited by 101
Great expectations: Public opinion about energy transition
Thomas, M., DeCillia, B., Santos, J. B., & Thorlakson, L. (2022) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112777 · Cited by 112
Presidential Debate Watching, Issue Knowledge, Character Evaluation, and Vote Choice
Benoit, W. L., & Hansen, G. J. (2004) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00727.x · Cited by 100
Public Opinion, the War in Iraq, and Presidential Accountability
Voeten, E., & Brewer, P. R. (2006) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002706291054 · Cited by 100
“…from Vietnam War, and the 1991 Gulf War—indicates that the nature of elite discourse about a war is a key determinant of changing patterns in both war support itself (Berinsky 2004; Larson 1996; Larson and Savych 2005; Zaller 1992) and presidential approval during wartime (Brody 1991, 1994).”
BackgroundMedia Supply, Audience Demand, and the Geography of News Consumption in the United States
Althaus, S. L., Cizmar, A., & Gimpel, J. G. (2009) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584600903053361 · Cited by 107
Beyond the Demand-Input Model: A Theory of Representational Linkages
Hurley, P. A., & HILL, K. Q. (2003) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/1468-2508.t01-2-00002 · Cited by 97
Direct democracy and European integration
HOBOLT, S. B. (2005) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501760500380825 · Cited by 100
Folk Realism: Testing the Microfoundations of Realism in Ordinary Citizens1
Kertzer, J. D., & McGraw, K. M. (2012) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00715.x · Cited by 98
More than Mimicry? The Role of Anger in Uncivil Reactions to Elite Political Incivility
Gervais, B. T. (2016) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edw010 · Cited by 98
Gruffydd-Jones, J. J. (2018) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414018784066 · Cited by 98
Dunning, T., Grossman, G., Humphreys, M., Hyde, S., McIntosh, C., Nellis, G., Adida, C. L., Arias, E., Bicalho, C., Boas, T. C., et al. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw2612 · Cited by 105
Creative (Climate) Communications
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047 · Cited by 107
Policy Feedback in an Age of Polarization
Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2019) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716219871222 · Cited by 107
Jacobs, N. F., & Munis, B. K. (2022) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129221124864 · Cited by 107
Punitive Attitudes on Crime: Economic Insecurity, Racial Prejudice, or Both?
Johnson, D. (2001) · Sociological Focus · doi:10.1080/00380237.2001.10571182 · Cited by 97
Priming Patriots: Social Identity Processes and the Dynamics of Public Support for War
Althaus, S. L., & Coe, K. (2011) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfq071 · Cited by 98
Inequality Is a Problem of Inference: How People Solve the Social Puzzle of Unequal Outcomes
Mijs, J. J. B. (2018) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc8030064 · Cited by 105
Rockers, P. C., Kruk, M. E., & Laugesen, M. (2012) · Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law · doi:10.1215/03616878-1573076 · Cited by 98
How Domestic Is Domestic Politics? Globalization and Elections
Kayser, M. A. L. A. D. (2007) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.080605.135728 · Cited by 98
“Given the notoriously meager levels of information commanded by voters about politics in their own country (cf. Campbell et al. 1980 [1960], Zaller 1992, Clarke et al. 2004), let alone in other countries, the likelihood that voters directly respond to events or changing sentiment abroad seems…”
BackgroundThe Effects of Gender-Bending on Candidate Evaluations
Schneider, M. C. (2014) · Journal of Women Politics & Policy · doi:10.1080/1554477x.2014.863697 · Cited by 97
Crow, D. A., Berggren, J., Lawhon, L. A., Koebele, E. A., Kroepsch, A. C., & Huda, J. (2016) · Environment and Planning C Politics and Space · doi:10.1177/0263774x16667302 · Cited by 99
Politically Motivated Selective Exposure and Perceived Media Bias
Barnidge, M., Gunther, A. C., Kim, J., Hong, Y., Perryman, M. R., Tay, S. K., & Knisely, S. (2017) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650217713066 · Cited by 96
Racial Attitudes Through a Partisan Lens
Engelhardt, A. (2020) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123419000437 · Cited by 101
“Party elites, for instance, discuss race in markedly different ways when it becomes salient (Engelhardt forthcoming; Haney López 2014; King and Smith 2014), offering one potential source of party-driven attitude change (Zaller 1992).”
BackgroundInfluentialDjupe, P. A., Lewis, A. R., & Sokhey, A. E. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009234078 · Cited by 96
Jagers, S. C., & Matti, S. (2010) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su2041055 · Cited by 97
Temporal Order and Causal Inference
Miller, W. E. (1999) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a029809 · Cited by 97
“For our present purposes, these echoes of more conventional contributions to the literature on the formation and organization of political attitudes add credibility to the meaningfulness of our tabular algorithm (see Converse 1962; Zaller 1992).”
BackgroundCarnes, N., & Sadin, M. (2014) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/678530 · Cited by 95
When Do Welfare Attitudes Become Racialized? The Paradoxical Effects of Education
Federico, C. M. (2004) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00076.x · Cited by 96
Party Identification, Contact, Contexts, and Public Attitudes toward Illegal Immigration.
Gravelle, T. B. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfv054 · Cited by 74
The Political Domain Appears Simpler to the Politically Extreme Than to Political Moderates
Lammers, J., Koch, A. S., Conway, P. J., & Brandt, M. J. (2016) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550616678456 · Cited by 92
Stoeckel, F., & Kuhn, T. (2017) · JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/jcms.12610 · Cited by 104
“That is, citizens do not apprehend all sorts of political information, but are more likely to accept and remember elite cues from “their” party (Zaller, 1992).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential“It’s Largely a Rigged System”: Voter Confidence and the Winner Effect in 2016
Sinclair, B., Smith, S. S., & Tucker, P. (2018) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912918768006 · Cited by 101
The Microfoundations of State Cybersecurity: Cyber Risk Perceptions and the Mass Public
Kostyuk, N., & Wayne, C. N. (2019) · Journal of Global Security Studies · doi:10.1093/jogss/ogz077 · Cited by 105
Dictators and Their Subjects: Authoritarian Attitudinal Effects and Legacies
Neundorf, A., & Pop-Elecheș, G. (2020) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414020926203 · Cited by 105
Hatcher, W. (2020) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074020941734 · Cited by 108
College students' views on criminal justice
Farnworth, M., Longmire, D. R., & West, V. M. (1998) · Journal of Criminal Justice Education · doi:10.1080/10511259800084171 · Cited by 96
Radnitz, S., & Underwood, P. (2015) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123414000556 · Cited by 71
Zuckerman, A. S., Valentino, N. A., & Zuckerman, E. W. (1994) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2132071 · Cited by 96
Kim, S.-Y., Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. G. (2008) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-009-9099-8 · Cited by 102
Theories of Political Literacy
Cassel, C. A., & Lo, C. C. (1997) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1024895721905 · Cited by 96
Schmidt, V. A. (2017) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2017.1304974 · Cited by 96
Through the Grapevine: Informational Consequences of Interpersonal Political Communication
CARLSON, T. N. (2019) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305541900008x · Cited by 95
“Political scientists were initially skeptical that the media could influence opinions (Berelson, Lazarsfeld, and McPhee 1954; Campbell et al. 1960), butmost research since then argues that the media can indeed impact public opinion (Bartels 1993; Iyengar and Kinder 1987; Popkin 1994; Zaller 1992).”
BackgroundPolitics in the Mind's Eye: Imagination as a Link between Social and Political Cognition
Petersen, M. B., & Aarøe, L. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055413000026 · Cited by 97
Larsen, M. V., Hjorth, F., Dinesen, P. T., & Sønderskov, K. M. (2019) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055419000029 · Cited by 92
“Specifically, we propose that the aspects of the local economy to which citizens have been exposed more frequently and more recently are more likely to figure as salient “top-of-mind” considerations (Zaller 1992).”
BackgroundBenedictis-Kessner, J. D., Baum, M., Berinsky, A. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2019) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055419000418 · Cited by 89
“…moreor less likely tooccur(Bullock2011;Dilliplane2014; Feldman 2011a, 2011b; Levendusky 2013b), as well as under which partisan media may provoke a backlash against theperspectivebeingadvocated(Zaller1992), the outlet presenting the argument (Arceneaux, Johnson, and Murphy 2012; Coe et al. 2008;)”
BackgroundCompelling Arguments and Attitude Strength
Kiousis, S. K. (2005) · Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1081180x05276095 · Cited by 95
Has Television Personalized Voting Behavior?
Hayes, D. (2008) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-008-9070-0 · Cited by 95
Confidence in Government and Emotional Responses to Terrorism After September 11, 2001
Gross, K., Brewer, P. R., & Aday, S. (2008) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x08319954 · Cited by 92
MEASURING THE EFFECTS OF TELEVISED POLITICAL ADVERTISING IN THE UNITED STATES
Goldstein, K. M., & Ridout, T. N. (2004) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104820 · Cited by 94
Helbling, M., Reeskens, T., & Wright, M. (2016) · Nations and Nationalism · doi:10.1111/nana.12235 · Cited by 92
Partisan asymmetry in temporal stability of climate change beliefs
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Ripberger, J. T., Silva, C. L., Carlson, D. E., Gupta, K., Carlson, N., Ter-Mkrtchyan, A., & Dunlap, R. E. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0719-y · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Zaller, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zaller, John R.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1992-08-28
- OpenAlex
- W4300170376
- Cited by
- 7,785
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 392 · 2025: 487 · 2024: 402 · 2023: 360 · 2022: 461 · 2021: 456 · 2020: 483 · 2019: 463 · 2018: 381 · 2017: 353 · 2016: 297 · 2015: 306 · 2014: 283 · 2013: 248 · 2012: 287
- FWCI
- 89.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- mass opinion, political information acquisition, political elites, mass media, political preferences, public opinion dynamics, political attention, political knowledge, salience, framing effects, political discourse, public trust in government, racial equality, presidential approval, voting behavior, United States elections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review