The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Resilience and Mental Health: Challenges Across the Lifespan
Abstract
Humans are remarkably resilient in the face of crises, traumas, disabilities, attachment losses and ongoing adversities. To date, most research in the field of traumatic stress has focused on neurobiological, psychological and social factors associated with trauma-related psychopathology and deficits in psychosocial functioning. Far less is known about resilience to stress and healthy adaptation to stress and trauma. This book brings together experts from a broad array of scientific fields whose research has focused on adaptive responses to stress. Each of the five sections in the book examines the relevant concepts, spanning from factors that contribute to and promote resilience, to populations and societal systems in which resilience is employed, to specific applications and contexts of resilience and interventions designed to better enhance resilience. This will be suitable for clinicians and researchers who are interested in resilience across the lifespan and in response to a wide variety of stressors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As stressful events are inherently highly emotional (Southwick et al., 2011) and can increase vulnerability to psychopathology (Grueschow et al., 2021), the ability to regulate emotions may be a critically important factor in determining stress resilience (Barzilay et al., 2020; Kaldewaij et al., 2021) and mental wellbeing (Satchit et al., 2011; Silton et al., 2020).”
From Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Increases Mental Wellbeing and Emotion Regulation During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Synchronous Online Intervention Study (2021) · cites this paper as Southwick et al., 2011
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives
Southwick, S. M., Bonanno, G. A., Masten, A. S., Panter-Brick, C., & Yehuda, R. (2014) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338 · Cited by 2,968
The science of resilience: implications for the prevention and treatment of depression
Southwick, S. M., & Charney, D. S. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1222942 · Cited by 875
A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience
Kalisch, R., Müller, M. B., & Tüscher, O. (2015) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1400082x · Cited by 669
Resilience in Development: Progress and Transformation
Masten, A. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2016) · Developmental Psychopathology · doi:10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy406 · Cited by 416
ASIPP, A. (2012) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2012/15/s67 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2011-08-18
- OpenAlex
- W561856152
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- resilience, mental health, stress adaptation, trauma, traumatic stress, resilience interventions, attachment loss, adversity, psychosocial functioning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review