The DOI matches its Crossref record; 381 of the 381 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrated Risk and Uncertainty Assessment of Climate Change Response Policies
Open accessAbstract
Introduction This framing chapter considers ways in which risk and uncertainty can affect the process and outcome of strategic choices in responding to the threat of climate change. ‘Uncertainty’ denotes a cognitive state of incomplete knowledge that results from a lack of information and/or from disagreement about what is known or even knowable. It has many sources ranging from quantifiable errors in the data to ambiguously defined concepts or terminology to uncertain projections of human behaviour. The Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties (Mastrandrea et al., 2010) summarizes alternative ways of representing uncertainty. Probability density functions and parameter intervals are among the most common tools for characterizing uncertainty. ‘Risk’ refers to the potential for adverse effects on lives, livelihoods, health status, economic, social and cultural assets, services (including environmental), and infrastructure due to uncertain states of the world. To the extent that there is a detailed understanding of the characteristics of a specific event, experts will normally be in agreement regarding estimates of the likelihood of its occurrence and its resulting consequences. Risk can also be subjective in the sense that the likelihood and outcomes are based on the knowledge or perception that a person has about a given situation. There may also be risks associated with the outcomes of different climate policies, such as the harm arising from a change in regulations. There is a growing recognition that today's policy choices are highly sensitive to uncertainties and risk associated with the climate system and the actions of other decision makers. The choice of climate policies can thus be viewed as an exercise in risk management (Kunreuther et al., 2013a). Figure 2.1 suggests a risk management framework that serves as the structure of the chapter. After defining risk and uncertainty and their relevant metrics (Section 2.2), we consider how choices with respect to climate change policy options are sensitive to risk and uncertainty (Section 2.3).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Decision, Probability and Utility · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,474
A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE
Simon, H. A. (1955) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884852 · Cited by 15,877
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity
Leiss, W., Beck, U., Ritter, M., Lash, S., & Wynne, B. (1994) · Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie · doi:10.2307/3341155 · Cited by 12,546
Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-0977 · Cited by 11,572
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
(2007) · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · Cited by 9,690
Slovic, P. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563507 · Cited by 9,271
Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity
Boyd, W., Beck, U., & Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1993) · Economic Geography · doi:10.2307/143601 · Cited by 9,215
Cited by
Sea Level Rise and Implications for Low-Lying Islands, Coasts and Communities
(2022) · The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate · doi:10.1017/9781009157964.012 · Cited by 831
Lang, N., Kalischek, N., Armston, J., Schindler, K., Dubayah, R., & Wegner, J. D. (2022) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2021.112760 · Cited by 291
Cooper, M., Messina, C. D., Tang, T., Gho, C., Powell, O. M., Podlich, D. W., Technow, F., & Hammer, G. L. (2022) · Plant Breeding Reviews · doi:10.1002/9781119874157.ch8 · Cited by 56
Designing the climate observing system of the future.
Weatherhead, E. C., Wielicki, B. A., Ramaswamy, V., Abbott, M., Ackerman, T. P., Atlas, R., Brasseur, G., Bruhwiler, L., Busalacchi, A. J., Butler, J. H., et al. (2018) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1002/2017ef000627 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Venue
- Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2015-01-26
- Pages
- 151-206
- OpenAlex
- W2186601538
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 381
- FWCI
- 247.18
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated Risk and Uncertainty Assessment of Climate Change Response Policies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781107415416.008
- The paper
- Integrated Risk and Uncertainty Assessment of Climate Change Response Policies. (2015). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415416.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.