The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Language and Gender
Abstract
Language and Gender is an introduction to the study of the relation between gender and language use, written by two leading experts in the field. This new edition, thoroughly updated and restructured, brings out more strongly an emphasis on practice and change, while retaining the broad scope of its predecessor and its accessible introductions which explain the key concepts in a non-technical way. The authors integrate issues of sexuality more thoroughly into the discussion, exploring more diverse gendered and sexual identities and practices. The core emphasis is on change, both in linguistic resources and their use and in gender and sexual ideologies and personae. This book explores how change often involves conflict and competing norms, both social and linguistic. Drawing on their own extensive research, as well as other key literature, the authors argue that the connections between language and gender are deep yet fluid, and arise in social practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Swearing is often considered to index particularly working-class masculinities (Baruch & Jenkins, 2007;Eckert & McConnell-Ginet, 2013), potentially as a way of avoiding effeminacy (De Klerk, 1997).”
From Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable (2023) · cites this paper as Eckert & McConnell-Ginet, 2013
Citations
Cites
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Hearing lips and seeing voices
MCGURK, H., & MACDONALD, J. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/264746a0 · Cited by 6,183
Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception
Strand, E. A. (1999) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x99018001006 · Cited by 388
Stress and Dominance in a Social Fish
Fox, H. E., White, S. A., Kao, M. H. F., & Fernald, R. D. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-16-06463.1997 · Cited by 295
Does Sex‐biased Job Advertising “Aid and Abet” Sex Discrimination? 1
Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. (1973) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1973.tb01290.x · Cited by 218
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445605054407 · Cited by 3,797
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20237 · Cited by 2,433
Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes
Garg, N., Schiebinger, L., Jurafsky, D., & Zou, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1720347115 · Cited by 1,065
Classifying latent user attributes in twitter
Rao, D., Yarowsky, D., Shreevats, A., & Gupta, M. (2010) · Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Search and mining user-generated contents · doi:10.1145/1871985.1871993 · Cited by 655
Style transfer through back-translation
Prabhumoye, S., Tsvetkov, Y., Salakhutdinov, R., & Black, A. W. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1080 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S.
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2013-02-07
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 5
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review