The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rising Life Expectancy: A Global History
Abstract
Between 1800 and 2000 life expectancy at birth rose from about 30 years to a global average of 67 years, and to more than 75 years in favored countries. This dramatic change, called the health transition, is characterized by a transition both in how long people expected to live, and how they expected to die. The most common age at death jumped from infancy to old age. Most people lived to know their children as adults, and most children became acquainted with their grandparents. Whereas earlier people died chiefly from infectious diseases with a short course, by later decades they died from chronic diseases, often with a protracted course. The ranks of people living in their most economically productive years filled out, and the old became commonplace figures everywhere. Rising Life Expectancy: A Global History examines the way humans reduced risks to their survival, both regionally and globally, to promote world population growth and population aging.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Before the middle of the nineteenth century, life expectancy at birth for humans was between 20 and 50 years.
“Before the middle of the nineteenth century, life expectancy at birth for humans languished at low levels by today’s standards—between 20 years and 50 years1.”
From Implausibility of radical life extension in humans in the twenty-first century (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
Over the twentieth century, human life expectancy at birth rose in high-income nations by approximately 30 years, largely driven by advances in public health and medicine.
“Over the course of the twentieth century, human life expectancy at birth rose in high-income nations by approximately 30 years, largely driven by advances in public health and medicine.”
From Implausibility of radical life extension in humans in the twenty-first century (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global Burden of Disease and the Impact of Mental and Addictive Disorders
Rehm, J., & Shield, K. D. (2019) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-019-0997-0 · Cited by 1,388
Longevity Among Hunter‐ Gatherers: A Cross‐Cultural Examination
Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2007) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00171.x · Cited by 670
Ezzati, M., Friedman, A. B., Kulkarni, S. C., & Murray, C. J. L. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050066 · Cited by 346
Dynamics of life expectancy and life span equality
Aburto, J. M., Villavicencio, F., Basellini, U., Kjærgaard, S., & Vaupel, J. W. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1915884117 · Cited by 254
The demographic transition revisited as a global process
Reher, D. S. (2004) · Population, Space and Place · doi:10.1002/psp.313 · Cited by 247
Integrating the environmental and genetic architectures of aging and mortality
Argentieri, M. A., Amin, N., Nevado-Holgado, A. J., Sproviero, W., Collister, J. A., Keestra, S. M., Kuilman, M. M., Ginos, B. N. R., Ghanbari, M., Doherty, A., et al. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03483-9 · Cited by 211
Ditlevsen, D. N., & Elklit, A. (2010) · Annals of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1744-859x-9-32 · Cited by 204
Implausibility of radical life extension in humans in the twenty-first century
Olshansky, S. J., Willcox, B. J., Demetrius, L., & Beltrán-Sánchez, H. (2024) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-024-00702-3 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Riley, J. C.
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2001-06-04
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review