CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,128Natural Resources and Economic DevelopmentPolitical Conflict and GovernanceCorruption and Economic Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do Natural Resources Fuel Authoritarianism? A Reappraisal of the Resource Curse

Open access
HABER, STEPHEN, MENALDO, VICTOR·2011·American Political Science Review
DOI 10.1017/s0003055410000584
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A large body of scholarship finds a negative relationship between natural resources and democracy. Extant cross-country regressions, however, assume random effects and are run on panel datasets with relatively short time dimensions. Because natural resource reliance is not an exogenous variable, this is not an effective strategy for uncovering causal relationships. Numerous sources of bias may be driving the results, the most serious of which is omitted variable bias induced by unobserved country-specific and time-invariant heterogeneity. To address these problems, we develop unique historical datasets, employ time-series centric techniques, and operationalize explicitly specified counterfactuals. We test to see if there is a long-run relationship between resource reliance and regime type within countries over time, both on a country-by-country basis and across several different panels. We find that increases in resource reliance are not associated with authoritarianism. In fact, in many specifications we generate results that suggest a resource blessing.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0003055410000584

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 105 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Friedman, 2006, The First Law of Petropolitics, Foreign Policy, 154, 28
  2. Smith, 2007, Hard Times in the Land of Plenty: Oil Politics in Iran and Indonesia
  3. Luciani, 1987, The Rentier State
  4. Mahdavy, 1970, Studies in the Economic History of the Middle East

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,128

Related

Metadata

Authors
HABER, S., & MENALDO, V.
Affiliations
  • Hoover Institution (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
  • HABER, STEPHEN
  • MENALDO, VICTOR
ORCID
MENALDO, VICTOR
Venue
American Political Science Review
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2011-01-27
Volume
105
Issue
1
Pages
1-26
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
DOI
10.1017/s0003055410000584
OpenAlex
W2114260857
Cited by
1,128
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 99 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 66
FWCI
188.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)
Locations
  • American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
Keywords
resource curse, natural resources, authoritarianism, democracy, resource dependence, political regimes, omitted variable bias, counterfactual analysis, resource blessing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review