The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate
Abstract
An enduring concern about democracies is that citizens conform too readily to the policy views of elites in their own parties, even to the point of ignoring other information about the policies in question. This article presents two experiments that undermine this concern, at least under one important condition. People rarely possess even a modicum of information about policies; but when they do, their attitudes seem to be affected at least as much by that information as by cues from party elites. The experiments also measure the extent to which people think about policy. Contrary to many accounts, they suggest that party cues do not inhibit such thinking. This is not cause for unbridled optimism about citizens' ability to make good decisions, but it is reason to be more sanguine about their ability to use information about policy when they have it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Consistent with this view, a growing number of empirical studies have uncovered evidence that people update their political attitudes and beliefs in line with evidence (e.g., refs. 4,13,27–29) and arguments23,30,31 presented to them.”
From Factual knowledge can reduce attitude polarization (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“However, follow-up research indicated that this was true for Republican but not Democratic supporters86.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [86]
Citations
Cites
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. J. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,558
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies
Rubin, D. B. (1974) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037350 · Cited by 9,436
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
DeLamater, J., & Ward, A. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,590
Book Review: The Psychology of Attitudes
Chakravarti, D., Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151869 · Cited by 7,173
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 · Cited by 5,359
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.
Kenski, H. C., & Zaller, J. R. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074664 · Cited by 5,150
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 1×
“(Some authors have already made a start: e.g., Druckman 2001, 72n11; Iyengar et al. 2008, 195; and Jost et al. 2003.)”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Estlund, 2007, Democratic Authority
- Bishop, 2005, The Illusion of Public Opinion
- Fenno, 1978, Home Style: House Members in Their Districts
- Cacioppo, 1981, Cognitive Assessment, 309
- Sniderman, 2000, Elements of Reason
- Kuklinski, 2000, Elements of Reason
- Graber, 1984, Processing the News
- Iyengar, 2000, Elements of Reason
- 10.1515/9781400830480 · DOI
- 2004, The State of the News Media 2004
- Browning, 1992, Ordinary Men
- Eagly, 1993, The Psychology of Attitudes
- Lieb David A. 2005 April 7. “Missouri Medicaid Cuts Sent to Blunt.” Associated Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 776
Fleming, A. M., Montgomery, M. D., & Rogol, N. C. (2025) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.70027 · Cited by 1
The Power of Presidential Partisanship: Going Public on Court Reform
Rogol, N. C., Fleming, A. M., & Montgomery, M. D. (2025) · Presidential Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/psq.70000 · Cited by 1
“” We follow prior literature on partisanship and group independents who lean toward either party with partisans of that party for the purpose of analysis, while pure independents were excluded (see Bullock 2011; Druckman et al. 2012; Bolsen et al. 2014).”
Beyond income: Understanding preferences for redistribution among the top 1%
Strehl, M., Bérgolo, M., & Leites, M. (2025) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107132 · Cited by 1
Ibrahim, S. S., Taher, A., & Pedersen, Z. P. (2025) · International Journal of Sport Communication · doi:10.1123/ijsc.2025-0140 · Cited by 1
The effect of real‐news party cues
Skytte, R. (2025) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.70014 · Cited by 1
Is It Worth Posting? Testing the Influence of State Legislators in Simulated Social Media
Hemmen, A. (2025) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1017/spq.2025.10011 · Cited by 1
Preference reversals in early policy adoption
Unan, A. (2025) · Policy & Politics · doi:10.1332/03055736y2025d000000076 · Cited by 1
Ulrich, M. (2026) · European Politics and Society · doi:10.1080/23745118.2026.2615460 · Cited by 1
“Individuals who support a party are more susceptible to that party’s cues, and thus more likely to align their attitudes with that party (Bullock, 2011, pp. 500–503; Kam, 2005, pp. 170–175; Vrân-ceanu & Lachat, 2021, pp. 9–14).”
Go, M. H., Kweon, Y., Miwa, H., & Ono, Y. (2026) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfag030 · Cited by 1
“In these situations, accuracy motivations are more likely to pre-vail, making individuals more inclined to accept credible corrective information (Bullock 2011; Hill 2017 ; Pennycook and Rand 2019).”
Shifted by Similarity? How Politically Targeted Ads Based on Party and Issue Persuade Voters
Remoortere, A. V., Vermeer, S. A. M., Chu, X., Vliegenthart, R., & Kruikemeier, S. (2026) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2026.2658513 · Cited by 1
“This openness is also more likely when people hold less strong initial opinions about the issue (Boudreau and MacKenzie 2014) or when they have been exposed to substantial amounts of policy information (Bullock 2011).”
To what extent do political elites influence public opinion about immigration?
Corre, T. L., Green, J., & Yeandle, A. (2026) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1017/s1475676526101388 · Cited by 1
Effects of land acknowledgements on non-Indigenous audiences in Australia and the USA
McNamee, L., & Peyton, K. (2026) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02520-6 · Cited by 1
Public Opinion and Democratic Decision Making in Nigeria
Akande, L. F. (2014) · Public Policy and Administration Research · Cited by 1
The Epistemic Value of Public Opinion: Theoretical and Practical Considerations
Engelken-Jorge, M. (2015) · Critical Horizons · doi:10.1179/1440991715z.00000000051 · Cited by 1
Making Informed Citizens in Local Direct Democracy. What Part Does Their Government Perform?
Pleschberger, W. (2016) · The urban book series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43979-2_12 · Cited by 1
Bush, S. S., & Jamal, A. (2012) · Cited by 1
A Paradox in Polarization? Cross‐pressured Representatives and the Missing Incentive to Moderate
Toll, B. T. (2019) · World Affairs · doi:10.1177/0043820019825934 · Cited by 1
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820.009 · Cited by 1
Foundations of Political Psychology
(2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.001 · Cited by 1
Boudreau, C., Elmendorf, C., & MacKenzie, S. A. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2022.19 · Cited by 1
Kim, K. E., & McKinnon, L. M. (2022) · Journal of Creative Communications · doi:10.1177/09732586221128747 · Cited by 1
“Although polarising cues such as party label are influential, citizens are affected at least as much by exposure to campaign messages (Bullock, 2011; Foos & Rooij, 2017).”
BackgroundIdentifying the regulator’s objective: Does political support matter?
Raff, Z. (2023) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-022-01032-x · Cited by 1
“There exists a rich literature examining how public opinion affects the policies of political parties (e.g., Barbera et al., 2019; Ezrow & Hellwig, 2014; Stimson et al., 1995) and vice versa (e.g., Bullock, 2011; McDonald et al., 2004).”
BackgroundPeterson, E. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01552-6 · Cited by 1
It’s My Party, I’ll Endorse If I Want To:
Vizcarrondo, T. (2021) · Southwestern Mass Communication Journal · doi:10.58997/smc.v37i1.91 · Cited by 1
“Studies have examined elite endorsements within the context of a ballot initiative (Bullock, 2011), judicial elections (Vining & Wilhem, 2011), intra-party primary elections (Cancela et al.”
InfluentialStokan, E., Anson, I. G., & Jensen, N. M. (2025) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.70016 · Cited by 1
“Existing research on public attitudes often focuses on the role of political elite cues in driving public attitudes on political decisions and issues (e.g., Bullock, 2011; Kertzer & Zeitzoff, 2017).”
Barber, M. J., Canes‐Wrone, B., Clinton, J. D., & Huber, G. A. (2025) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfaf012 · Cited by 2
“…life of the mother and/or in the case of rape and incest) is arguably meaningful and not simply a result of survey respondents providing answers following partisan or elite cues, as may be the case for less salient and more obscure policies (e.g., Zaller 1992; Bullock 2011; Barber and Pope 2019).”
Betting on Partisanship: Biased Information Processing and Opinion Change on a Citizen Initiative
Barbieri, A., Petitpas, A., & Sciarini, P. (2025) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-025-10053-3 · Cited by 1
“For example, the two experimental studies reported by Bullock (2011) show that the effects of position taking by party elites are smaller than the effects of policy information.”
InfluentialRole of Dialogue in Public Opinion Formation
Hänggli, R. (2019) · Challenges to democracy in the 21st century · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26582-3_8 · Cited by 1
How do voters react when their party forms a coalition they dislike?
Guntermann, E., & Blais, A. (2019) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1660557 · Cited by 1
“There is considerable evidence that citizens follow parties on policy issues (e.g. Bullock 2011; Druckman et al. 2013; Lenz 2012) and candidate preferences (Rahn 1993); why would parties not also influence how they feel about coalitions?”
BackgroundRode, J. B., & Ditto, P. H. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-020-00602-z · Cited by 1
Digital Media and Collective Action
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820.005 · Cited by 1
How Can Direct Democracy Be Improved?
Altman, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108634397.008 · Cited by 1
Understanding Policy Attitudes: Effect of Affective Source Cues on Political Reasoning
Hrbková, L. (2016) · Masarykova univerzita eBooks · doi:10.5817/cz.muni.m210-8056-2016 · Cited by 1
Edwards, G. C. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316091906.020 · Cited by 1
Misinformation on Refugees: Surveying the Consequences, Perpetuators and Workable Solutions
Turper, S., & Aslam, W. (2022) · Istanbul Bilgi University · doi:10.47613/reflektif.2022.71 · Cited by 1
Balmas, M., & Atia, R. (2022) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqac017 · Cited by 1
Zumofen, G. (2022) · Swiss Political Science Review · doi:10.1111/spsr.12545 · Cited by 3
Elenbaas, M. (2013) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 1
The Rise of Partisan Rigidity: The Nature and Origins of Partisan Extremism in American Politics
Luttig, M. D. (2016) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 1
Media Source, Selective Exposure, and Susceptibility to False InformationPreprint
Clayton, K., Davis, J., Hinckley, K., & Horiuchi, Y. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3035272 · Cited by 1
How Elite Partisan Cues Affect International Organization LegitimacyPreprint
Dellmuth, L., & Tallberg, J. (2020) · doi:10.33774/apsa-2020-9jhng · Cited by 1
Conditional Party LoyaltyPreprint
Mummolo, J., Peterson, E., & Westwood, S. J. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3246632 · Cited by 2
Angelis, A. D., Colombo, C., & Morisi, D. (2021) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/g7p8e · Cited by 1
Nyhan, B. J., Helmke, G., Sanders, M., Clayton, K., Carey, J. M., & Stokes, S. C. (2019) · doi:10.33774/apsa-2019-wjva3 · Cited by 1
Heuristic ProjectionPreprint
Broockman, D., Kaufman, A. R., & Lenz, G. (2020) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/rjmfq · Cited by 1
What Explains Educational Realignment? An Issue Voting Framework for Analyzing Electoral CoalitionsPreprint
Marble, W. (2024) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/2e3jp · Cited by 1
Boddery, S. S., & Yates, J. L. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2370857
Going Public with the ProcessPreprint
Miles, M. R. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal
Perceptions of Polarization: Examining Voter Responses to Candidate ExtremityPreprint
Visalvanich, N., & Bonoff, N. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2246947
Stealing Signs: How Broken Rules Structure Identity.
Jakle, A. (2014) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
An Internal Critique of Schumpeter on Popular RulePreprint
Ingham, S. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2434249
Presidential Influence on Partisans' OpinionsPreprint
Edwards, G. C. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2576444
Bailey, M. A., & Wilcox, C. (2015) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x15593341
Pannico, R. (2013) · 20th International Conference of Europeanists - Crisis & Contingency: States of (In)Stability
6 Experiments: Partisan Cues in Multi-party Systems
Brader, T. A., & Tucker, J. A. (2012)
White Racial Identity, Party Identification, and Party Affect: An Experiment in Priming
McMahon, R. (2014) · CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder)
Lay Judgments of Legal Decision-Making: The Ineffectiveness of Legal Expert OpinionsPreprint
Simon, D., & Scurich, N. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2108374
Analyzing and Predicting Hypocrisy in the Electorate
Collins, T. P. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54012-2_5
What Is Attitudinal Hypocrisy and Why Does It Matter?
Collins, T. P. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54012-2_2
Anderson, M. T. (2014) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Source Cues or Policy Considerations: What Influences Foreign Public Opinion?Preprint
Agadjanian, A., & Horiuchi, Y. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3039822
Does International Travel Boost One's Interest in Foreign Policy? Attitude Change Among Tourists
Carder, K., & Machida, S. (2017) · Tourism Culture & Communication · doi:10.3727/109830417x15057457661640
The Effect of Financial Literacy on Policy PreferencesPreprint
Petrachkova, A. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3069574
“Bullock (2011) conducts two experiments in which participants are given a text about a policy debate – healthcare benefits for the poor – with or without party cues and finds that “attitudes seem to be affected at least as much by that information as by cues from party elites” and “party cues do not inhibit thinking […”
InfluentialThe Force of the Better Evidence in Political Opinion UpdatingPreprint
Kim, J. W. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3133254
Guardino, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190888183.003.0002
Guardino, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190888183.003.0003
“No One Wants to Change the System as Much as Those Who Are Trapped by the System”
Guardino, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190888183.003.0004
What’s New? Media, Public Opinion, and Democracy in the 21st Century
Guardino, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190888183.003.0006
Looking Backward, Looking Forward
Guardino, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190888183.003.0007
Framing Inequality at the Ground Level
Guardino, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190888183.003.0005
'Solidarity among Strangers'? Citizenship, Identity, and Ambivalent Attitudes in Europe
Stoeckel, F. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/vt80-1x41
The Democratic Dilemma: Taking the Dilemma out of Democracy
Rosenbluth, F. M. (2019) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096519000969
“To put this in context, consider recent scholarship by Bullock and others (Bullock 2011; Bullock et al. 2015) that suggests American voters use various types of information in addition to party cues in forming their judgments.”
BackgroundAndersson, F. (2019) · Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University)
Does Party Support Explain Voting Behavior?
Zenkyo, M. (2016) · The Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association · doi:10.7218/nenpouseijigaku.67.2_163
Scrosati, S. (2019) · QSpace (Queen's University Library)
Democratic Innovations for Representative Governments
Altman, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108634397.002
Gerrymandering - A Threat to the Republic
McDonough, B. S. (2020)
Do Democratic Principles Constrain the Effectiveness of Elite Cues on Election Rules?Preprint
McCarthy, D. (2020) · doi:10.33774/apsa-2020-6k4bt
“When citizens have significant information about policies, they are just as likely to use that information as elite cues when coming to their opinion about the policy (Bullock 2011).”
BackgroundParliamentary Communication Allowances: Good for Nothing?
Umit, R. (2020) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1177/1478929920967588
“Recent experiments show that communicating simple positional cues to constituents – without any explanations and irrespective of the positions taken – work well for incumbents (Broockman and Butler, 2017; Bullock, 2011).”
BackgroundThe Flow of Political Information
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820.002
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820.007
Trüdinger, E., Hildebrandt, A., Jäckle, S., & Löser, J. K. (2021) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12931
The Effects of Political Information
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820.004
Crawley, S. (2021) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.14312924.v1 · Cited by 1
Altman, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108634397.006
Salmon or Chameleon? Rethinking Evangelical Political Behavior
Crawford, J. (2021) · Digital Archive @ GSU · doi:10.57709/22579228
Altman, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108634397.005
Introduction: The Needs of Political News
Calfano, B., Martinez‐Ebers, V., & Ramusovic, A. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70877-1_1
The Effect of Financial Literacy on Policy Preferences: Evidence from ArgentinaPreprint
Petrachkova, A. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3253135
Protest against the politicians: Vote switching in the Italian 2016-2020 constitutional referenda
Bergman, M. E., & Passarelli, G. (2021) · Quaderni dell Osservatorio elettorale QOE - IJES · doi:10.36253/qoe-10720
Son, S., & Park, J. H. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3718620
Citations to Interest Groups and Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions
Canelo, K. S. (2022) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/jels.12304
Anson, I. G., & Kane, J. (2022) · doi:10.33774/apsa-2022-chjcw
Altman, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108634397.009
(2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820.010
Altman, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108634397.003
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820.003
Metadata
- Authors
- BULLOCK, J. G.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- BULLOCK, JOHN G.
- ORCID
- BULLOCK, JOHN G.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 496-515
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W3124069454
- Cited by
- 777
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 154.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- elite influence, public opinion, party cues, policy information, party identification, democratic decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
