The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate
Abstract
An enduring concern about democracies is that citizens conform too readily to the policy views of elites in their own parties, even to the point of ignoring other information about the policies in question. This article presents two experiments that undermine this concern, at least under one important condition. People rarely possess even a modicum of information about policies; but when they do, their attitudes seem to be affected at least as much by that information as by cues from party elites. The experiments also measure the extent to which people think about policy. Contrary to many accounts, they suggest that party cues do not inhibit such thinking. This is not cause for unbridled optimism about citizens' ability to make good decisions, but it is reason to be more sanguine about their ability to use information about policy when they have it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Consistent with this view, a growing number of empirical studies have uncovered evidence that people update their political attitudes and beliefs in line with evidence (e.g., refs. 4,13,27–29) and arguments23,30,31 presented to them.”
From Factual knowledge can reduce attitude polarization (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“However, follow-up research indicated that this was true for Republican but not Democratic supporters86.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [86]
Citations
Cites
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. J. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,558
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies
Rubin, D. B. (1974) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037350 · Cited by 9,436
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
DeLamater, J., & Ward, A. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,590
Book Review: The Psychology of Attitudes
Chakravarti, D., Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151869 · Cited by 7,173
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 · Cited by 5,359
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.
Kenski, H. C., & Zaller, J. R. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074664 · Cited by 5,150
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 1×
“(Some authors have already made a start: e.g., Druckman 2001, 72n11; Iyengar et al. 2008, 195; and Jost et al. 2003.)”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Estlund, 2007, Democratic Authority
- Bishop, 2005, The Illusion of Public Opinion
- Fenno, 1978, Home Style: House Members in Their Districts
- Cacioppo, 1981, Cognitive Assessment, 309
- Sniderman, 2000, Elements of Reason
- Kuklinski, 2000, Elements of Reason
- Graber, 1984, Processing the News
- Iyengar, 2000, Elements of Reason
- 10.1515/9781400830480 · DOI
- 2004, The State of the News Media 2004
- Browning, 1992, Ordinary Men
- Eagly, 1993, The Psychology of Attitudes
- Lieb David A. 2005 April 7. “Missouri Medicaid Cuts Sent to Blunt.” Associated Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 776
Altman, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108634397.001
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820.006
Altman, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108634397.004
Attitude Instability and Measurement: Item-Specificity and Group DifferencesPreprint
Zheng, B. Q. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8vmes
Observability Obstructs Motivated Reasoning in AutocracyPreprint
Сироткина, Е. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4050130
Altman, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108634397.010
Guardino, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190888183.003.0001
Nyhan, B. J., Helmke, G., Sanders, M., Clayton, K., Carey, J. M., & Stokes, S. C. (2020) · doi:10.33774/apsa-2019-wjva3-v4
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820.011
Nyhan, B. J., Helmke, G., Sanders, M., Clayton, K., Carey, J. M., & Stokes, S. C. (2020) · doi:10.33774/apsa-2019-wjva3-v5
Do Facts Change Public Attitudes toward Fiscal Policy?
Sides, J. M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197578384.003.0014
Opinion Formation in Light of the Facts
Boudreau, C., & MacKenzie, S. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197578384.003.0012
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.002.0004
Measuring Policy Orientations and Political Sophistication
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0004
A Test of How Elite Polarization Shapes Mass Political Behavior
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0007
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0002 · Cited by 1
How Political Sophistication Shapes Responses to Elite Polarization
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0008
Elite Polarization and Americans’ Perceptions of the Political Parties
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0003
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.002.0007
The Relationships between Policy Orientations, Partisanship, and Vote Choice
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0006
The Implications of Our Polarized Politics
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0009
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.002.0003
A Test of the Recursive Relationship between Policy Orientations and Partisanship
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0005
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0001
Vagthund eller skødehund? Efterspørgslen på kritisk journalistik under coronakrisen
Skovsgaard, M., Andersen, K., & Heiselberg, L. (2022) · Politica · doi:10.7146/politica.v54i4.134831
“Andre studier finder dog, at vælgerne tolker partiernes udmeldinger i relation til deres egne eksisterende holdninger til spørgsmålet og til den information, de har tilgængelig, hvilket begrænser partiernes indflydelse (fx Bullock, 2011; Mullinix, 2016; Peterson, 2019; Slothuus, 2010).”
BackgroundRobinson, M. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197611555.003.0004
Robinson, M. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197611555.003.0007
Robinson, M. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197611555.003.0002
Robinson, M. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197611555.003.0003
Robinson, M. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197611555.003.0005
Robinson, M. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197611555.003.0006
Robinson, M. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197611555.005.0001
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197611555.002.0010
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197611555.002.0009
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197611555.002.0004
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197611555.002.0006
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197611555.002.0020
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197611555.002.0011
Robinson, M. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197611555.003.0001
The effect of financial literacy on policy preferences: evidence from Argentina
Petrachkova, A. (2022) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edac021
Government repression and citizen support for democratic rights in Africa
Selvik, L.-M. M., & Dupuy, K. E. (2023) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2023.2173738
How voters think about the electoral relevance of the Supreme CourtPreprint
Davis, N. T., & Hitt, M. P. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/n3sfh
Joseph, J. J., Motley, S. M., Aguado, N. A., & McAbee, M. (2023) · Contemporary Justice Review · doi:10.1080/10282580.2023.2204905
“Party elites, elected officials, and legislative leaders can influence individual policy preferences (Bullock, 2011).”
BackgroundWhich Politicians Choose to Get Nasty and When?
Zeitzoff, T. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0005
Zeitzoff, T. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0001
Prelude to War, a Coup and an Insurrection, and Concluding Thoughts
Zeitzoff, T. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0008
(2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.002.0004
(2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.002.0003
(2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.002.0008
How Does the Public Respond to Nasty Rhetoric?
Zeitzoff, T. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0004
(2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.002.0006
Zeitzoff, T. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0002
Nasty Politics and Its Implications for Democracy
Zeitzoff, T. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0007
(2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.002.0009
(2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.002.0007
Zeitzoff, T. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.005.0001
From Insults to Incitement in U.S., Ukrainian, and Israeli Politics
Zeitzoff, T. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0003
What Do the Experts Think about Nasty Politics?
Zeitzoff, T. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0006
Argument-stretching: (slightly) invalid political arguments and their effects on public opinion
Vössing, K. (2023) · European Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s1755773923000164
“…highlights the explanation at large and variation between types of explanations, as well as on studies of other mechanisms of elite influence, which analyze entire policy messages (Bullock, 2011) or frames (Chong and Druckman, 2007) rather than separate components of these political statements.”
Is it the Message or the Messenger? Examining Movement in Immigration BeliefsPreprint
Afrouzi, H., Arteaga, C., & Weisburst, E. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4491228 · Cited by 1
Is it the Message or the Messenger? Examining Movement in Immigration BeliefsPreprint
Afrouzi, H., Arteaga, C., & Weisburst, E. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4497972 · Cited by 1
Beyond Changing Minds: Raising the Issue Importance of Expanding Legal ImmigrationPreprint
Kustov, A. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/meujy
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0002
What Future Do We Want? Evaluating Judicial Independence
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0014
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. P. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.002.0003
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0007
Voting in the Shadow of Accountability
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0011
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. P. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.002.0008
New Politics, New Justices, New Policies
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0012
The Candidates for the Court and the Nominees
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0004
Cameron, C. M., Kastellec, J., Bass, L., & Dean, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0006
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0003
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0001
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0013
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0010
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0015
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. P. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.002.0005
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0008
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0005
The Logic of Presidential Selection
Cameron, C. M., Kastellec, J., & Mattioli, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0009
SOCIOECONOMIC POLICY EVALUATION: PARTISANSHIP AND PARTISAN BIAS EFFECT
Меркулова, Т. В., & Мartynеnko, М. (2023) · Social Economics · doi:10.26565/2524-2547-2023-65-01
Device Differences in Survey-Experimental Treatment Effects: A Cross-Country ExplorationPreprint
Bækgaard, M., Blom‐Hansen, J., Christensen, J., & Serritzlew, S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4589979
Williams, R. J., & Christiani, L. (2023) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1017/lsi.2023.69
Indirect Influence: How Elite Attacks on Information Providers Affect Public Opinion Formation
Peterson, E., Archer, A. M. N., Bhakta, K., & IZUMISAWA, S. (2026) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/742987
Ajzenman, N., Ardanaz, M., Cruces, G., Feierherd, G., & Lunghi, I. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4795363
The Effect of Party Labels on Policy PreferencesPreprint
Nozawa, R. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4772382
Content Analysis Information for Chapters 3–6
Guardino, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190888183.005.0001
Study Design Information for Chapter 5
Guardino, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190888183.005.0002
Guardino, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190888183.002.0009
Supplementary Analyses for Chapter 5
Guardino, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190888183.005.0003
Guardino, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190888183.002.0005
Guardino, M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190888183.002.0004
Are We Drowning at the Water’s Edge? Foreign Policy Polarization Among the US Public
Smeltz, D. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-58618-7_2 · Cited by 1
Opinion Instability and Measurement Errors: A G-Theory Analysis of College Students
Zheng, B. Q. (2024) · Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives · doi:10.1080/15366367.2024.2366553
“Individuals often align their views with the policy positions of their preferred parties (Bullock, 2011; Lenz, 2012).”
Motivated Social Cognition About Social Justice
Hennes, E. P., Dang, L., & Jost, J. T. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197763414.013.37
Morality policy at the frontier of science: legislators’ views on germline engineering
Johnson, D. R., & O’Brien, T. L. (2024) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scae048
How rational inference about authority debunking can curtail, sustain or spread belief polarizationPreprint
Radkani, S., Landau-Wells, M., & Saxe, R. R. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8dq9x
Tsai, C. (2024) · Political Science · doi:10.1080/00323187.2024.2388587
“…parties (Arceneaux, 2008; Campbell et al. 1960; Green, Palmquist, and Schickler 2008; Rahn, 1993), elites (Brader, Valentino, and Suhay 2008; Bullock 2011; Zaller 1992), politicians (Nicholson 2011, 2012), and social groups (Brady and Sniderman, 1985; Cohen 2003; Gilens 1999; Lupia 1994)…”
Boudreau, C., & MacKenzie, S. A. (2024) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-024-09964-4
“Of course, many studies do manipulate political information (Bullock, 2011; Nicholson, 2011), but they rarely examine spatial voting as the outcome (see Sniderman & Stiglitz, 2012 and Boudreau et al., 2019 for exceptions).”
The Moderating Role of Affective Polarization on Party Cues: The Case of the Prostitution Ban
Felipe, P. O., Zepeda, J. A. R., & Sánchez-Ferrer, L. (2024) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642241285019
“…partisan biases in the context of non-politicized issues (Druckman et al., 2021b; Kam, 2005), whereas the effect of the party cue tends to be smaller when the issue has a clear ideo-logical structure and is unambiguously identified with a political party (Bullock, 2011; Chong & Mullinix, 2019).”
Metadata
- Authors
- BULLOCK, J. G.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- BULLOCK, JOHN G.
- ORCID
- BULLOCK, JOHN G.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 496-515
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W3124069454
- Cited by
- 777
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 154.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- elite influence, public opinion, party cues, policy information, party identification, democratic decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
