Cited by 134Nuts composition and effectsNutritional Studies and DietFatty Acid Research and Health

Effect of almond-enriched high-monounsaturated fat diet on selected markers of inflammation: a randomised, controlled, crossover study

Open access
Rajaram, Sujatha, Connell, Kristianne M., Sabaté, Joan·2010·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Frequent consumption of nuts lowers the risk of CHD. While lowering blood lipids is one of the mechanisms for cardioprotection, the present study sought to determine whether monounsaturated fat-rich almonds also influence other CHD risk factors such as inflammation and haemostasis. This was a randomised, controlled, crossover feeding study with twenty-five healthy adults (eleven men; fourteen women), age 22–53 years. Following a 2 week run-in phase (34 % energy from fat), subjects were assigned in random order to three diets for 4 weeks each: a heart-healthy control diet with no nuts ( < 30 % energy from fat), low-almond diet and high-almond diet (10 % or 20 % isoenergetic replacement of control diet with almonds, respectively). Serum E-selectin was significantly lower on the high-almond diet compared with the control diet.E-selectin decreased as the percentage of energy from almonds increased (P < 0·0001). C-reactive protein (CRP) was lower in both the almond diets compared with the control diet. A clear dose response was not observed for either E-selectin or CRP. There was no effect of diet on IL-6 or fibrinogen. Tissue plasminogen activator antigen was significantly lower on the control and high-almond diets compared with the low-almond diet, although the values were within normal range. In conclusion, consumption of almonds influenced a few but not all of the markers of inflammation and haemostasis. A clear dose response was not observed for any of the markers studied.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114509992480

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rajaram, S., Connell, K. M., & Sabaté, J.
Affiliations
Loma Linda University (US)
Corresponding author
Rajaram, Sujatha
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2009-10-29
Volume
103
Issue
6
Pages
907-912
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2115496162
Cited by
134
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Almond Board of California
  • University of California, Davis
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nuts composition and effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
Keywords
almond, monounsaturated fatty acids, inflammation, cardiovascular risk factors, E-selectin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, fibrinogen, tissue plasminogen activator, hemostasis, dietary intervention, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Adult, C-Reactive Protein, Energy Intake, Diet, Dietary Fats, Unsaturated, Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated, Female, Fibrinogen, Hemostasis, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Middle Aged, Nuts, Tissue Plasminogen Activator, Biomarkers, Interleukin-6, Cross-Over Studies, E-Selectin, Prunus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review