Impact of low v. moderate intakes of long-chain n-3 fatty acids on risk of coronary heart disease
Open accessAbstract
The objective of the present study was to determine whether the consumption of ≥ 250 v. < 250 mg of the long-chain n-3 fatty acids (n-3 LCFA) per d is associated with a reduction in the risk of fatal and non-fatal CHD in individuals with no prior history of CHD. A comprehensive and systematic review of the published scientific literature resulted in the identification of eight prospective studies (seven cohorts and one nested case–control study) that met predefined inclusion criteria. Relative to the consumption of < 250 mg n-3 LCFA per d, the consumption of ≥ 250 mg/d was associated with a significant 35·1 % reduction in the risk of sudden cardiac death and a near-significant 16·6 % reduction in the risk of total fatal coronary events, while the risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction was not significantly reduced. In several meta-analyses, which were based on US studies, risk of CHD death was found to be dose-dependently reduced by the n-3 LCFA, with further risk reductions observed with intakes in excess of 250 mg/d. Prospective observational and intervention data from Japan, where intake of fish is very high, suggest that n-3 LCFA intakes of 900 to 1000 mg/d and greater may confer protection against non-fatal myocardial infarction. Thus, the intake of 250 mg n-3 LCFA per d may, indeed, be a minimum target to be achieved by the general population for the promotion of cardiovascular health.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A systematic review reported a threshold effect suggesting that ≥250 mg of omega-3 FA per day was associated with a significant 35% reduction in sudden cardiac death.
“A systematic review reported a threshold effect suggesting that 250 mg of omega-3 FA per day was associated with a signi fi cant 35% reduction in sudden cardiac death.[32]”
From Effect of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Iso, H., Kobayashi, M., Ishihara, J., Sasaki, S., Okada, K., Kita, Y., Kokubo, Y., & Tsugane, S. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.581355 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
Fish consumption and cardiovascular disease in the physicians’ health study: A prospective study
Morris, M. C., Manson, J. E., Rosner, B., Buring, J. E., Willett, W. C., & Hennekens, C. H. (1995) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117615 · Cited by 268 · cited 11× · see citing works
“Of the studies, one was based on a cohort made up exclusively of women (the Nurses’ Health Study(18)); six publications were based on cohorts made up exclusively of men (the Health Professionals’ Follow-up Study(16,21), the Physicians’ Health Study(15,19), the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial(17) and the Alpha-…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bo ¨hning D, Kuhnert R & Rattanasiri S (2008) Quantification of heterogeneity in a MAIPD. 9.3: the unconditional variance and its estimation. In Meta-analysis of Binary Data Using Profile Likelihood. Chapman & Hall/CRC Interdisciplinary Statistics Series, chapter 9, p. 138. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
- Yamagishi K, Iso H, Date C, et al. (2008) Fish, v-3 polyunsa- turated fatty acids, and mortality from cardiovascular diseases British Journal of Nutrition https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114511001644 Published online by Cambridge University Press in a nationwide community-based cohort of Japanese men and women the JACC (Japan Collaborative Cohort Study for Evaluation of Cancer Risk) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52, 988-996.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kinoshita, M., Yokote, K., Arai, H., Iida, M., Ishigaki, Y., Ishibashi, S., Umemoto, S., Egusa, G., Ohmura, H., Okamura, T., et al. (2018) · Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis · doi:10.5551/jat.gl2017 · Cited by 813 · see citing works
Effect of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Khan, S. U., Lone, A. N., Khan, M. S., Virani, S. S., Blumenthal, R. S., Nasir, K., Miller, M., Michos, E. D., Ballantyne, C. M., Boden, W. E., et al. (2021) · eClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100997 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
“A systematic review reported a threshold effect suggesting that 250 mg of omega-3 FA per day was associated with a significant 35% reduction in sudden cardiac death.[32] In REDUCE-IT, on-treatment EPA levels were strongly correlated with”
BackgroundNestel, P., Clifton, P., Colquhoun, D., Noakes, M., Mori, T. A., Sullivan, D., & Thomas, B. (2015) · Heart, Lung and Circulation · doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2015.03.020 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Wolfram, G., Bechthold, A., Boeing, H., Ellinger, S., Hauner, H., Kroke, A., Leschik-Bonnet, E., Linseisen, J., Lorkowski, S., Schulze, M., et al. (2015) · Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism · doi:10.1159/000437243 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Kleiner, A. C., Cladis, D. P., & Santerre, C. R. (2015) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.6816 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Ip, C.-K., Jin, D.-M., Gao, J.-J., Meng, Z., Meng, J., Tan, Z., Wang, J.-F., & Geng, D.-F. (2015) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.228 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Musa-Veloso, K., Binns, M. A., Kocenas, A., Chung, C., Rice, H., Oppedal-Olsen, H., Lloyd, H., & Lemke, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Intertek (Canada) (CA)
- Monsanto (United States) (US)
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-05-31
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1129-1141
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2064918080
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Dartmouth College
- South Dakota Governor's Office of Economic Development
- University of Cambridge
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Keywords
- n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, omega-3 fatty acids, coronary artery disease, dietary intake, dose-response relationship, sudden cardiac death, myocardial infarction, fish consumption, cardiovascular health, dietary recommendations
- MeSH terms
- Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Risk Reduction Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review