Cited by 60Fatty Acid Research and HealthNutritional Studies and DietAquaculture Nutrition and Growth

Impact of low v. moderate intakes of long-chain n-3 fatty acids on risk of coronary heart disease

Open access
Musa-Veloso, Kathy, Binns, Malcolm A., Kocenas, Alexandra, Chung, Catherine, Rice, Harry, Oppedal-Olsen, Hilde, Lloyd, Hilary, Lemke, Shawna·2011·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to determine whether the consumption of ≥ 250 v. < 250 mg of the long-chain n-3 fatty acids (n-3 LCFA) per d is associated with a reduction in the risk of fatal and non-fatal CHD in individuals with no prior history of CHD. A comprehensive and systematic review of the published scientific literature resulted in the identification of eight prospective studies (seven cohorts and one nested case–control study) that met predefined inclusion criteria. Relative to the consumption of < 250 mg n-3 LCFA per d, the consumption of ≥ 250 mg/d was associated with a significant 35·1 % reduction in the risk of sudden cardiac death and a near-significant 16·6 % reduction in the risk of total fatal coronary events, while the risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction was not significantly reduced. In several meta-analyses, which were based on US studies, risk of CHD death was found to be dose-dependently reduced by the n-3 LCFA, with further risk reductions observed with intakes in excess of 250 mg/d. Prospective observational and intervention data from Japan, where intake of fish is very high, suggest that n-3 LCFA intakes of 900 to 1000 mg/d and greater may confer protection against non-fatal myocardial infarction. Thus, the intake of 250 mg n-3 LCFA per d may, indeed, be a minimum target to be achieved by the general population for the promotion of cardiovascular health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114511001644

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A systematic review reported a threshold effect suggesting that ≥250 mg of omega-3 FA per day was associated with a significant 35% reduction in sudden cardiac death.

    “A systematic review reported a threshold effect suggesting that 250 mg of omega-3 FA per day was associated with a signi fi cant 35% reduction in sudden cardiac death.[32]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bo ¨hning D, Kuhnert R & Rattanasiri S (2008) Quantification of heterogeneity in a MAIPD. 9.3: the unconditional variance and its estimation. In Meta-analysis of Binary Data Using Profile Likelihood. Chapman & Hall/CRC Interdisciplinary Statistics Series, chapter 9, p. 138. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
  2. Yamagishi K, Iso H, Date C, et al. (2008) Fish, v-3 polyunsa- turated fatty acids, and mortality from cardiovascular diseases British Journal of Nutrition https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114511001644 Published online by Cambridge University Press in a nationwide community-based cohort of Japanese men and women the JACC (Japan Collaborative Cohort Study for Evaluation of Cancer Risk) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52, 988-996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Musa-Veloso, K., Binns, M. A., Kocenas, A., Chung, C., Rice, H., Oppedal-Olsen, H., Lloyd, H., & Lemke, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Intertek (Canada) (CA)
  • Monsanto (United States) (US)
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2011-05-31
Volume
106
Issue
8
Pages
1129-1141
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2064918080
Cited by
60
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Dartmouth College
  • South Dakota Governor's Office of Economic Development
  • University of Cambridge
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Keywords
n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, omega-3 fatty acids, coronary artery disease, dietary intake, dose-response relationship, sudden cardiac death, myocardial infarction, fish consumption, cardiovascular health, dietary recommendations
MeSH terms
Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review