Cited by 316Thermoregulation and physiological responsesSleep and Work-Related FatigueExercise and Physiological Responses

Mild dehydration impairs cognitive performance and mood of men

Open access
Ganio, Matthew S., Armstrong, Lawrence E., Casa, Douglas J., McDermott, Brendon P., Lee, Elaine C., Yamamoto, Linda M., Marzano, Stefania, Lopez, Rebecca M. +4 more·2011·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

The present study assessed the effects of mild dehydration on cognitive performance and mood of young males. A total of twenty-six men (age 20·0 (sd 0·3) years) participated in three randomised, single-blind, repeated-measures trials: exercise-induced dehydration plus a diuretic (DD; 40 mg furosemide); exercise-induced dehydration plus placebo containing no diuretic (DN); exercise while maintaining euhydration plus placebo (EU; control condition). Each trial included three 40 min treadmill walks at 5·6 km/h, 5 % grade in a 27·7°C environment. A comprehensive computerised six-task cognitive test battery, the profile of mood states questionnaire and the symptom questionnaire (headache, concentration and task difficulty) were administered during each trial. Paired t tests compared the DD and DN trials resulting in >1 % body mass loss (mean 1·59 (sd 0·42) %) with the volunteer's EU trial (0·01 (sd 0·03) %). Dehydration degraded specific aspects of cognitive performance: errors increased on visual vigilance (P = 0·048) and visual working memory response latency slowed (P = 0·021). Fatigue and tension/anxiety increased due to dehydration at rest (P = 0·040 and 0·029) and fatigue during exercise (P = 0·026). Plasma osmolality increased due to dehydration (P < 0·001) but resting gastrointestinal temperature was not altered (P = 0·238). In conclusion, mild dehydration without hyperthermia in men induced adverse changes in vigilance and working memory, and increased tension/anxiety and fatigue.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114511002005

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using more precise markers of dehydration, others have found that cognitive function impairment is associated with hypovolemia, further compounded by heat stress and physical activity.

    “Using more precise markers of dehydration, others have found that cognitive function impairment is associated with hypovolemia, further compounded by heat stress and physical activity [23,50].”

    From Reduced cognitive function during a heat wave among residents of non-air-conditioned buildings: An observational study of young adults in the summer of 2016 (2018) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Abstract reports that mild dehydration impaired vigilance and working memory in young men. It does not establish that hypovolemia was the associated factor: the reported measures include body-mass loss and plasma osmolality, not a demonstrated link between reduced blood volume and cognition. The paper also says earlier studies combined dehydration with heat and exercise, making their separate effects difficult to determine; its own finding was obtained without hyperthermia, not evidence that heat stress and activity compounded the impairment. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ganio, M. S., Armstrong, L. E., Casa, D. J., McDermott, B. P., Lee, E. C., Yamamoto, L. M., Marzano, S., Lopez, R. M., Jimenez, L., Le Bellego, L., Chevillotte, E., & Lieberman, H. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Danone (France) (FR)
  • U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Armstrong, Lawrence E.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2011-06-07
Volume
106
Issue
10
Pages
1535-1543
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2151148167
Cited by
316
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
11.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Danone
  • University of South Florida
  • University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
mild dehydration, cognitive performance, mood, exercise-induced dehydration, furosemide, visual vigilance, visual working memory, fatigue, tension-anxiety, plasma osmolality, gastrointestinal temperature, heat stress, young men
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Cognition, Dehydration, Humans, Male, Placebos, Task Performance and Analysis, Exercise, Single-Blind Method, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review