Cited by 70Gut microbiota and healthFood composition and propertiesMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

Dietary pea fiber supplementation improves glycemia and induces changes in the composition of gut microbiota, serum short chain fatty acid profile and expression of mucins in glucose intolerant rats

Open access
Hashemi, Zohre, Fouhse, Janelle, Im, Hyun, Chan, Catherine, Willing, Benjamin·2017·Nutrients

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated the beneficial impact of dried peas and their components on glucose tolerance; however, the role of gut microbiota as a potential mediator is not fully examined. In this study, we investigated the effect of dietary supplementation with raw and cooked pea seed coats (PSC) on glucose tolerance, microbial composition of the gut, select markers of intestinal barrier function, and short chain fatty acid profile in glucose intolerant rats. Male Sprague Dawley rats were fed high fat diet (HFD) for six weeks to induce glucose intolerance, followed by four weeks of feeding PSC-supplemented diets. Cooked PSC improved glucose tolerance by approximately 30% (p < 0.05), and raw and cooked PSC diets reduced insulin response by 53% and 56% respectively (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01), compared to HFD (containing cellulose as the source of dietary fiber). 16S rRNA gene sequencing on fecal samples showed a significant shift in the overall microbial composition of PSC groups when compared to HFD and low fat diet (LFD) controls. At the family level, PSC increased the abundance of Lachnospiraceae and Prevotellaceae (p < 0.001), and decreased Porphyromonadaceae (p < 0.01) compared with HFD. This was accompanied by increased mRNA expression of mucin genes Muc1, Muc2, and Muc4 in ileal epithelium (p < 0.05). Serum levels of acetate and propionate increased with raw PSC diet (p < 0.01). These results indicate that supplementation of HFD with PSC fractions can improve glycemia and may have a protective role against HFD-induced alterations in gut microbiota and mucus layer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu9111236

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee Canadian diabetes association 2013 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada Can. J. Diabetes 2013 37 Suppl. S1 S1 S212 24070926

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hashemi, Z., Fouhse, J., Im, H., Chan, C., & Willing, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
Corresponding author
Willing, Benjamin
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-11-12
Volume
9
Issue
11
Pages
1236
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767477196
Cited by
70
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
dietary fiber supplementation, impaired glucose tolerance, gut microbiota, short-chain fatty acids, mucin gene expression, intestinal barrier function, high-fat diet, insulin response, Lachnospiraceae, Prevotellaceae, acetate, propionate, ileal epithelium, mucus layer
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Bacteria, Blood Glucose, Dietary Fiber, Disease Models, Animal, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Ileum, Insulin, Male, Mucins, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Glucose Intolerance, Pisum sativum, Dietary Supplements, Toll-Like Receptors, Diet, High-Fat, Occludin, Zonula Occludens-1 Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review