The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The genetic basis of inbreeding depression
Open accessAbstract
Data on the effects of inbreeding on fitness components are reviewed in the light of population genetic models of the possible genetic causes of inbreeding depression. Deleterious mutations probably play a major role in causing inbreeding depression. Putting together the different kinds of quantitative genetic data, it is difficult to account for the very large effects of inbreeding on fitness in Drosophila and outcrossing plants without a significant contribution from variability maintained by selection. Overdominant effects of alleles on fitness components seem not to be important in most cases. Recessive or partially recessive deleterious effects of alleles, some maintained by mutation pressure and some by balancing selection, thus seem to be the most important source of inbreeding depression. Possible experimental approaches to resolving outstanding questions are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, Part V: Selection and Mutation
Haldane, J. B. S. (1927) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100015644 · Cited by 1,326
Cited by
Disgust: evolved function and structure
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2013) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0030778 · Cited by 810
The architecture of human kin detection
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05510 · Cited by 748
Genetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers
Hedrick, P. W., & Fredrickson, R. (2010) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-009-9999-5 · Cited by 361
Mate Choice and Genetic Quality: A Review of the Heterozygosity Theory
Kempenaers, B. (2007) · Advances in the Study of Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(07)37005-8 · Cited by 322
Conservation genetics of population bottlenecks: the role of chance, selection, and history
Bouzat, J. L. (2010) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-010-0049-0 · Cited by 289
Quantifying Temporal Genomic Erosion in Endangered Species
Díez-del-Molino, D., Sánchez-Barreiro, F., Barnes, I., Gilbert, M. T. P., & Dalén, L. (2018) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2017.12.002 · Cited by 258
Comparison of the genomes of human and mouse lays the foundation of genome zoology
Emes, R. D. (2003) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddg078 · Cited by 220
Inbreeding depression and male fitness in black grouse
Höglund, J., Piertney, S. B., Alatalo, R. V., Lindell, J., Lundberg, A., & Rintamäki, P. T. (2002) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1937 · Cited by 164
Genetic diversity, inbreeding and breeding practices in dogs: Results from pedigree analyses
Leroy, G. (2011) · The Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.06.016 · Cited by 143
García-Navas, V., Ortego, J., & Sanz, J. J. (2009) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0417 · Cited by 96
Mansour, H., Chowdari, K., Fathi, W., Elassy, M., Ibrahim, I., Wood, J., Bamne, M., Tobar, S., Yassin, A., Salah, H., et al. (2011) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2011.01.010 · Cited by 58
Noninvasive Sampling Reveals Short-Term Genetic Rescue in an Insular Red Fox Population
Quinn, C. B., Alden, P. B., & Sacks, B. N. (2019) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esz024 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- CHARLESWORTH, B., & CHARLESWORTH, D.
- Venue
- Genetical Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 329-340
- ISSN
- 0016-6723 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5073
- OpenAlex
- W1998771425
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
