Cited by 241Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingSustainable Finance and Green BondsEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Corporate Environmental Policy and Shareholder Value: Following the Smart Money

Fernando, Chitru S., Sharfman, Mark P., Uysal, Vahap B.·2017·Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis

Abstract

We examine the value consequences of corporate social responsibility through the lens of institutional shareholders. We find a sharp asymmetry between corporate policies that mitigate the firm’s exposure to environmental risk and those that enhance its perceived environmental friendliness (“greenness”). Institutional investors shun stocks with high environmental risk exposure, which we show have lower valuations, as predicted by risk management theory. These findings suggest that corporate environmental policies that mitigate environmental risk exposure create shareholder value. In contrast, firms that increase greenness do not create shareholder value and are also shunned by institutional investors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022109017000680

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another form of risk management would be to avoid problematic firms.

    “Another form of risk management would be to avoid problematic firms as pointed out theoretically by Heinkel, Kraus, and Zechner (2001) and empirically tested by Fernando, Sharfman, and Uysal (2017).”

    From The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors (2020) · cites this paper as Fernando, Sharfman, and Uysal (2017)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernando, C. S., Sharfman, M. P., & Uysal, V. B.
Venue
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
Published
2017-10
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
2023-2051
ISSN
  • 0022-1090 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-6916
OpenAlex
W3125481893
Cited by
241
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5
FWCI
26.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
corporate environmental policy, shareholder value, institutional investors, corporate social responsibility, environmental risk exposure, vegetation greenness, risk management theory, stock valuation, institutional ownership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review