Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 561

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Descriptive Social Norms and Motivation to Vote: Everybody's Voting and so Should You

Gerber, Alan S., Rogers, Todd·2009·The Journal of Politics

Abstract

The fact that many citizens fail to vote is often cited to motivate others to vote. Psychological research on descriptive social norms suggests that emphasizing the opposite—that many do vote—would be a more effective message. In two get-out-the-vote field experiments, we find that messages emphasizing low expected turnout are less effective at motivating voters than messages emphasizing high expected turnout. The findings suggest that descriptive social norms affect vote intention only among citizens who vote infrequently or occasionally. Practically, the results suggest that voter mobilization efforts should emphasize high turnout, especially when targeting occasional and low rate of participation voters. More generally, our findings suggest that the common lamentation by the media and politicians regarding low participation may undermine turnout.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022381608090117

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.2307/2952366 · doi:10.2307/2952366
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.915 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.915 · Paper page
  3. Berelson Bernard, 1954, McPhee
  4. Dominitz Jeff, 2006, Review of Labour Economics & Industrial Relations, 20, 201
  5. 10.1257/aer.96.4.1271 · doi:10.1257/aer.96.4.1271 · Paper page
  6. 10.2307/2952266 · doi:10.2307/2952266
  7. Fishbein Martin, Cognitive responses in persuasion, ed. Richard E. Petty, Thomas M. Ostrom, and Timothy C. Brock.
  8. Fowler James H, Social Logic of Politics, ed. Alan Zuckerman.
  9. Huckfeldt Robert, Politics, and Social Communication
  10. Krosnick John, 2002, McGraw
  11. Light Paul C, The President's Agenda: Domestic Policy Choice from Kennedy to Clinton
  12. 10.2307/1953324 · DOI
  13. Rogers Todd, Unpublished manuscript
  14. Tullock Gordon, Towards a Mathematics of Politics
  15. Wolfinger Raymond E, 1980, Rosenstone

Cited by

See all 561

Metadata

Authors
Gerber, A. S., & Rogers, T.
Venue
The Journal of Politics
Published
2009-01
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
178-191
ISSN
  • 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2508
OpenAlex
W2119171649
Cited by
561
References
33
FWCI
74.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Descriptive Social Norms and Motivation to Vote: Everybody's Voting and so Should You. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022381608090117
The paper
Gerber, A. S., & Rogers, T. (2009). Descriptive Social Norms and Motivation to Vote: Everybody's Voting and so Should You. The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381608090117

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.