Cited by 117Wildlife Conservation and Criminology AnalysesWildlife Ecology and ConservationConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dynamics and underlying causes of illegal bushmeat trade in Zimbabwe

Open access

Abstract

Abstract The prevalence and impacts of the illegal trade in bushmeat are under appreciated in Southern Africa, despite indications that it constitutes a serious conservation threat in parts of the region. Bushmeat trade has emerged as a severe threat to wildlife conservation and the viability of wildlife-based land uses in Zimbabwe during a period of political instability and severe economic decline. We conducted a study around Savé Valley Conservancy in the South-East Lowveld of Zimbabwe to investigate the dynamics and underlying causes of the bushmeat trade, with the objective of developing solutions. We found that bushmeat hunting is conducted mainly by unemployed young men to generate cash income, used mostly to purchase food. Bushmeat is mainly sold to people with cash incomes in adjacent communal lands and population centres and is popular by virtue of its affordability and availability. Key drivers of the bushmeat trade in the South-East Lowveld include: poverty, unemployment and food shortages, settlement of wildlife areas by impoverished communities that provided open access to wildlife resources, failure to provide stakes for communities in wildlife-based land uses, absence of affordable protein sources other than illegally sourced bushmeat, inadequate investment in anti-poaching in areas remaining under wildlife management, and weak penal systems that do not provide sufficient deterrents to illegal bushmeat hunters. Each of these underlying causes needs to be addressed for the bushmeat trade to be tackled effectively. However, in the absence of political and economic stability, controlling illegal bushmeat hunting will remain extremely difficult and the future of wildlife-based land uses will remain bleak.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0030605310001274

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extremely high levels of poaching in SVC were the result of a large human population being settled on private land with large wildlife populations, and were exacerbated by Zimbabwe's economic crisis and food shortages arising from the FTLRP.

    “The extremely high levels of poaching in SVC were the result of a large human population being settled on private land with large wildlife populations, and were exacerbated by Zimbabwe’s economic crisis and food shortages arising from the FTLRP (Knapp, 2012; Lindsey et al., 2011a; Moss, 2007)”

    From The impact of land reform on the status of large carnivores in Zimbabwe (2016) · cites this paper as Lindsey et al., 2011a

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Child, 2005, Principles, Practice and Results of CBNRM in Southern Africa
  2. du Toit, 2004, Review of Wildlife Issues Associated with the Land Reform Programme in Zimbabwe
  3. Pole, 2006, Management Plan for the Savé Valley Conservancy
  4. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96027.x · DOI
  5. 2009, FAOSTAT
  6. Lindner, 2002, Handling non response error in the Journal of International Agriculture and Extension Education, Journal of International Agriculture and Extension Education, 9, 55
  7. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96156.x · DOI
  8. De Garine, 1999, Providing impala meat to local populations in Nyaminyami (Omay, Zimbabwe), Bois et forets des tropiques, 262, 61
  9. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99067.x · DOI
  10. Lindsey, 2009, The Potential Production of Meat from Savé Valley Conservancy
  11. Lewis, 2007, Bushmeat and Livelihoods, 177
  12. Brown, 2007, Bushmeat and Livelihoods, 92
  13. Martin, 2007, Savé Valley Conservancy: Management of the Elephant Population
  14. Vaughn, 2007, Bushmeat and Livelihoods, 177
  15. 2000, JMPIN version 4.0.2
  16. Hatton, 2001, Biodiversity and War: A Case Study of Mozambique
  17. 2008, The World Factbook
  18. Hanke, 2009, New Hyperinflation Index Puts Zimbabwe’s Inflation at 89.7 Sextillion Percent
  19. 2009, Unite for Children
  20. 2006, Dead by 34: How Aids and Starvation Condemn Zimbabwe’s Women to Early Grave

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lindsey, P. A., Romañach, S. S., Matema, S., Matema, C., Mupamhadzi, I., & Muvengwi, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pretoria (ZA)
  • University of Zimbabwe (ZW)
  • Bindura University of Science Education (ZW)
Corresponding author
Lindsey, P. A.
Venue
Oryx
Published
2011-01
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
84-95
ISSN
  • 0030-6053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3008
OpenAlex
W2167268201
Cited by
111
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oryx (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
bushmeat hunting, poverty, unemployment, food shortages, common land, anti-poaching, wildlife management, political instability, economic decline, Zimbabwe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review