Cited by 97Schizophrenia research and treatmentChild Abuse and TraumaPsychology and Mental Health

Modelling the interplay between childhood and adult adversity in pathways to psychosis: initial evidence from the AESOP study

Open access
Morgan, C., Reininghaus, U., Fearon, P., Hutchinson, G., Morgan, K., Dazzan, P., Boydell, J., Kirkbride, J. B. +4 more·2014·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: There is evidence that a range of socio-environmental exposures is associated with an increased risk of psychosis. However, despite the fact that such factors probably combine in complex ways to increase risk, the majority of studies have tended to consider each exposure separately. In light of this, we sought to extend previous analyses of data from the AESOP (Aetiology and Ethnicity in Schizophrenia and Other Psychoses) study on childhood and adult markers of disadvantage to examine how they combine to increase risk of psychosis, testing both mediation (path) models and synergistic effects. Method: All patients with a first episode of psychosis who made contact with psychiatric services in defined catchment areas in London and Nottingham, UK (n = 390) and a series of community controls (n = 391) were included in the AESOP study. Data relating to clinical and social variables, including parental separation and loss, education and adult disadvantage, were collected from cases and controls. Results: There was evidence that the effect of separation from, but not death of, a parent in childhood on risk of psychosis was partially mediated through subsequent poor educational attainment (no qualifications), adult social disadvantage and, to a lesser degree, low self-esteem. In addition, there was strong evidence that separation from, but not death of, a parent combined synergistically with subsequent disadvantage to increase risk. These effects held for all ethnic groups in the sample. Conclusions: Exposure to childhood and adult disadvantage may combine in complex ways to push some individuals along a predominantly sociodevelopmental pathway to psychosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291713000767

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The synergy of social adversity and other factors such as drug abuse and familial risk, in combination with exposure to childhood trauma, may push individuals beyond the threshold for psychotic disorder.

    “suggesting that it is the synergy of social adversity and other factors such as drug abuse and familial risk which, in combination with exposure to childhood trauma, may push individuals beyond the threshold for psychotic disorder”

    From Clinical, socio‐demographic and psychological characteristics in individuals with persistent psychotic experiences with and without a “need for care” (2016) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Results (Synergistic Effects; page unavailable) and Discussion report that childhood parental separation and adult social disadvantage interacted synergistically to increase psychosis risk. The Sociodevelopmental Pathway discussion also proposes that childhood adversity may interact with later stressors, including substance use. But the paper does not establish synergy involving drug abuse or familial risk; its Methodological Limitations section treats substance use as an unmeasured possible confounder and parental history as a limited proxy for genetic risk. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There seems to be a synergistic interplay between different risk factors, such as between childhood abuse and adult life events, as well as cannabis use, suggesting that exposure to childhood and adult disadvantage may combine in complex ways to push some individuals along the pathway to psychotic disorder.

    “There seems to be a synergistic interplay between different risk factors, such as between childhood abuse and adult life events, as well as cannabis use 31,32 , suggesting that exposure to childhood and adult disadvantage may combine in complex ways to push some individuals along the pathway to psychotic disorder.”

    From Clinical, socio‐demographic and psychological characteristics in individuals with persistent psychotic experiences with and without a “need for care” (2016) · cites this paper as [32]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Morgan et al reported a complex interplay between different environmental risk factors.

    “Our results are in line with Morgan et al's report 31,32 of a complex interplay between different environmental risk factors”
  • Since associations between one exposure and outcomes remain after controlling for other exposures, it is likely that additive effects and/or synergistic effects operate between risk factors.

    “Since associations between one exposure and outcomes remain after controlling for the other exposures (Schäfer and Fisher, 2011), it is likely that additive effects and/or synergistic effects operate between risk factors (Morgan et al., 2014; Guloksuz et al., 2015; Lataster et al., 2012; Morgan et al., 2008; Schäfer and Fisher, 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Cooper C Morgan C Byrne M Dazzan P Morgan K Hutchinson G Doody G Harrison G Leff J Jones P Ismail K Murray R Bebbington P Fearon P Perceptions of disadvantage, ethnicity and psychosis: results from the ÆSOP study British Journal of Psychiatry 2008 192 185 190 18310577
  2. Pantazis C Gordon D Levitas R Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain: The Millenium Survey 2006 The Policy Press Bristol
  3. Reininghaus U Craig TK Fisher HL Hutchinson G Fearon P Morgan K Dazzan P Doody GA Jones PB Murray RM Morgan C Ethnic identity, perceptions of disadvantage, and psychosis: findings from the AESOP study Schizophr Res 2010 124 43 8 20855184
  4. Rosenberg M Society and the Adolescent Self-Image 1989 Middletown, CT Wesleyan University Press
  5. Schwartz S Hernandez LM Blazer DG Modern epidemiologic approaches to interaction: applications to studies of genetic interactions In Genes, Behaviour and the Social Environment: Moving Beyond the Nature/Nurture Debate 2006 310 337 National Academies Press Washington DC, USA 20669442
  6. Schwartz S Susser E Susser E Schwartz S Morabia A Bromet EJ Relationships among causes. In Psychiatric Epidemiology: Searching for the Causes of Mental Disorders 2006 62 74 Oxford University Press Oxford
  7. van Os J Driessen G Gunther N Delespaul P Neighbourhood variation in incidence of schizophrenia. Evidence for person-environment interaction Br J Psychiatry 2000 176 243 8 10755071
  8. Zammit S Lewis G Rasbash J Dalman C Gustafsson JE Allebeck P Individuals, schools, and neighborhood: a multilevel longitudinal study of variation in incidence of psychotic disorders Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010b 67 914 22 20819985

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, C., Reininghaus, U., Fearon, P., Hutchinson, G., Morgan, K., Dazzan, P., Boydell, J., Kirkbride, J. B., Doody, G. A., Jones, P. B., Murray, R. M., & Craig, T.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • University of the West Indies (TT)
  • University of Westminster (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Morgan, C.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2013-04-16
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
407-419
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2158685026
Cited by
97
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (WT087417, 087417)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0606-1335, PDF-2011-04-065)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
psychosis risk, childhood adversity, parental separation, parental death, educational attainment, social deprivation, self-esteem, mediation, synergistic effect, first-episode psychosis, ethnic differences, socio-environmental risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child Abuse, England, Environment, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, London, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Psychotic Disorders, Self Concept, Social Environment, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review