Cited by 179Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionChild Abuse and TraumaSchizophrenia research and treatment

Childhood bullying and the association with psychosis in non-clinical and clinical samples: a review and meta-analysis

van Dam, D. S., van der Ven, E., Velthorst, E., Selten, J. P., Morgan, C., de Haan, L.·2012·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background Approximately 11% of schoolchildren are bullied on a regular basis. It has been argued that continuous exposure to stress is related to the development of psychotic symptoms. The current study sought to investigate whether being bullied in childhood is related to the development of psychotic symptoms. Method A search of PubMed, PsycINFO and EMBASE was conducted. The reference lists of included papers were searched to identify other eligible papers. A meta-analysis was performed on a subgroup of studies. Results We found four clinical and 10 general population studies that met inclusion criteria. The results of the clinical studies were mixed. However, the results of the non-clinical studies provided more consistent evidence that school bullying is related to the development of non-clinical psychotic symptoms. Stronger associations were found with increased frequency and severity and longer duration of being bullied. We performed a meta-analysis on seven population-based studies, yielding unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of 2.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-3.6] and 2.3 (95% CI 1.5-3.4) respectively. Conclusions Although there is some evidence of an association between bullying and psychosis in clinical samples, the research is too sparse to draw any firm conclusions. However, population-based non-clinical studies support the role of bullying in the development of psychotic symptoms later in life. These findings are consistent with findings of an increa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291712000360

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Dam, D. S., van der Ven, E., Velthorst, E., Selten, J. P., Morgan, C., & de Haan, L.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • King's College London (GB)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2012-03-09
Volume
42
Issue
12
Pages
2463-2474
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W1968727554
Cited by
179
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
childhood bullying, school bullying, psychotic symptoms, chronic stress, population-based study
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Personality Development, Psychotic Disorders, Risk Factors, Statistics as Topic, Crime Victims, Young Adult, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review