Cited by 409Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictors of treatment dropout in self-guided web-based interventions for depression: an ‘individual patient data’ meta-analysis

Open access

Abstract

Background: It is well known that web-based interventions can be effective treatments for depression. However, dropout rates in web-based interventions are typically high, especially in self-guided web-based interventions. Rigorous empirical evidence regarding factors influencing dropout in self-guided web-based interventions is lacking due to small study sample sizes. In this paper we examined predictors of dropout in an individual patient data meta-analysis to gain a better understanding of who may benefit from these interventions. Method: A comprehensive literature search for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychotherapy for adults with depression from 2006 to January 2013 was conducted. Next, we approached authors to collect the primary data of the selected studies. Predictors of dropout, such as socio-demographic, clinical, and intervention characteristics were examined. Results: Data from 2705 participants across ten RCTs of self-guided web-based interventions for depression were analysed. The multivariate analysis indicated that male gender [relative risk (RR) 1.08], lower educational level (primary education, RR 1.26) and co-morbid anxiety symptoms (RR 1.18) significantly increased the risk of dropping out, while for every additional 4 years of age, the risk of dropping out significantly decreased (RR 0.94). Conclusions: Dropout can be predicted by several variables and is not randomly distributed. This knowledge may inform tailoring of online self-help interventions to prevent dropout in identified groups at risk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291715000665

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 409

Metadata

Authors
Karyotaki, E., Kleiboer, A., Smit, F., Turner, D. T., Pastor, A. M., Andersson, G., Berger, T., Botella, C., Breton, J. M., Carlbring, P., Christensen, H., de Graaf, E., Griffiths, K., Donker, T., Farrer, L., Huibers, M. J. H., Lenndin, J., Mackinnon, A., Meyer, B., Moritz, S., Riper, H., Spek, V., Vernmark, K., & Cuijpers, P.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Trimbos Institute (NL)
  • Universitat Jaume I (ES)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Black Dog Institute (AU)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • City, University of London (GB)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • Avans University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Corresponding author
Karyotaki, E.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2015-04-17
Volume
45
Issue
13
Pages
2717-2726
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2133074847
Cited by
408
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (acceptedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
treatment discontinuation, depression, predictors of dropout, online self-help, individual patient data, gender differences, educational attainment, anxiety comorbidity, age, intervention tailoring
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Depression, Humans, Patient Dropouts, Prognosis, Psychotherapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review