Cited by 4Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationInflammatory Bowel Disease

Adapting ‘Tame Your Gut’ for patients with inflammatory bowel disease and co-morbid anxiety and/or depression

Open access
Hanlon, Inna, Hewitt, Catherine, Evans, Subhadra, Taylor, Jo, Selinger, Christian, Mikocka-Walus, Antonina·2022·Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

This qualitative study collected stakeholders’ views on adapting an existing online psychotherapy programme, ‘Tame Your Gut’, to the needs of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and comorbid anxiety and/or depression. Adult patients ( n = 13) and health professionals ( n = 12) participated in semi-structured focus groups or interviews, analysed with a thematic analysis. Patients had a generally positive attitude towards ‘Tame Your Gut’, while health professionals saw it as useful for selected patients only. Both groups indicated their preference for clinician-assisted online psychotherapy. ‘Tame Your Gut’ is acceptable to patients and health professionals but only when supported by clinicians.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1359105320945001

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous qualitative research found the inclusion of both therapist-led and self-directed modules maximizes exposure to subject matter experts while circumnavigating possible non-adherence with fully self-directed programs.

    “Previous qualitative research which explored perspectives of both consumers and health professionals found the inclusion of both therapist-led and self-directed modules maximizes exposure to subject matter experts while circumnavigating possible non-adherence with fully self-directed programs (Dober et al., 2021; Hanlon et al., 2022, Mikocka-Walus et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanlon, I., Hewitt, C., Evans, S., Taylor, J., Selinger, C., & Mikocka-Walus, A.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of York, UK
Venue
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2020-07-21
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
58-68
ISSN
  • 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7277
OpenAlex
W3044748300
Cited by
4
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
inflammatory bowel disease, anxiety, depression, comorbidities, online therapy, digital mental health interventions, intervention adaptation, stakeholder perspectives, acceptability
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Chronic Disease, Depression, Humans, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review