The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Religious and spiritual interventions in mental health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
Open accessAbstract
Background.: Despite the extensive literature assessing associations between religiosity/spirituality and health, few studies have investigated the clinical applicability of this evidence. The purpose of this paper was to assess the impact of religious/spiritual interventions (RSI) through randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Method.: A systematic review was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Collaboration, Embase and SciELO. Through the use of a Boolean expression, articles were included if they: (i) investigated mental health outcomes; (ii) had a design consistent with RCTs. We excluded protocols involving intercessory prayer or distance healing. The study was conducted in two phases by reading: (1) title and abstracts; (2) full papers and assessing their methodological quality. Then, a meta-analysis was carried out. Results.: Through this method, 4751 papers were obtained, of which 23 remained included. The meta-analysis showed significant effects of RSI on anxiety general symptoms (p< 0.001) and in subgroups: meditation (p< 0.001); psychotherapy (p= 0.02); 1 month of follow-up (p< 0.001); and comparison groups with interventions (p< 0.001). Two significant differences were found in depressive symptoms: between 1 and 6 months and comparison groups with interventions (p= 0.05). In general, studies have shown that RSI decreased stress, alcoholism and depression. Conclusions.: RCTs on RSI showed additional benefits including reduction of clinical symptoms (mainly anxiety). The diversity of protocols and outcomes associated with a lack of standardization of interventions point to the need for further studies evaluating the use of religiosity/spirituality as a complementary treatment in health care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 · Cited by 13,371
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136 · Cited by 10,349
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & for the CONSORT Group (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000251 · Cited by 2,296
Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Ravaud, P., & for the CONSORT Group* (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008 · Cited by 2,292
Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group
van Tulder, M., Furlan, A., Bombardier, C., & Bouter, L. (2003) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000065484.95996.af · Cited by 2,180
Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., Tarakeshwar, N., & Hahn, J. (2001) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.161.15.1881 · Cited by 759
Cramer, H., Lauche, R., Langhorst, J., & Dobos, G. (2013) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22166 · Cited by 708
Lifestyle medicine for depression
Sarris, J., O’Neil, A., Coulson, C. E., Schweitzer, I., & Berk, M. (2014) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-14-107 · Cited by 450
Breitbart, W., Poppito, S., Rosenfeld, B., Vickers, A. J., Li, Y., Abbey, J., Olden, M., Pessin, H., Lichtenthal, W., Sjoberg, D., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.36.2517 · Cited by 426
Religiosity/Spirituality and Mortality
Chida, Y., Steptoe, A., & Powell, L. H. (2009) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000190791 · Cited by 409
Cited by
Religiosity, depression, and quality of life in bipolar disorder: a two-year prospective study
Stroppa, A., Colugnati, F. A., Koenig, H. G., & Moreira-Almeida, A. (2018) · Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria · doi:10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2365 · Cited by 89
Brazilian scientific articles on “Spirituality, Religion and Health”
Damiano, R. F., Costa, L. A., Viana, M. T. S. A., Moreira-Almeida, A., Lucchetti, A. L. G., & Lucchetti, G. (2016) · Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo) · doi:10.1590/0101-60830000000073 · Cited by 61
Self-citationReligiosity and spirituality in psychiatry residency programs: why, what, and how to teach?
de Oliveira e Oliveira, F. H. A., Peteet, J. R., & Moreira-Almeida, A. (2021) · Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1590/1516-4446-2020-1106 · Cited by 59
Perceived barriers to providing spiritual care among psychiatric mental health nurses
Neathery, M., Taylor, E. J., & He, Z. (2020) · Archives of Psychiatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2020.10.004 · Cited by 55
Trkulja, V., & Barić, H. (2020) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-981-32-9705-0_22 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Gonçalves, J. P. B., Lucchetti, G., Menezes, P. R., & Vallada, H.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2015-07-23
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2937-2949
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2162182607
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 3.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Religious and spiritual interventions in mental health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291715001166
- The paper
- Gonçalves, J. P. B., Lucchetti, G., Menezes, P. R., & Vallada, H. (2015). Religious and spiritual interventions in mental health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291715001166
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
