Cited by 759Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Religious Struggle as a Predictor of Mortality Among Medically Ill Elderly Patients: A 2-Year Longitudinal Study

Pargament, Kenneth I., Koenig, Harold G., Tarakeshwar, Nalini, Hahn, June·2001·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although church attendance has been associated with a reduced risk of mortality, no study has examined the impact of religious struggle with an illness on mortality. OBJECTIVE: To investigate longitudinally the relationship between religious struggle with an illness and mortality. METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study from 1996 to 1997 was conducted to assess positive religious coping and religious struggle, and demographic, physical health, and mental health measures at baseline as control variables. Mortality during the 2-year period was the main outcome measure. Participants were 596 patients aged 55 years or older on the medical inpatient services of Duke University Medical Center or the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC. RESULTS: After controlling for the demographic, physical health, and mental health variables, higher religious struggle scores at baseline were predictive of greater risk of mortality (risk ratio [RR] for death, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.11; chi(2) = 5.89; P =.02). Two spiritual discontent items and 1 demonic reappraisal item from the religious coping measure were predictive of increased risk for mortality: "Wondered whether God had abandoned me" (RR for death, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07-1.50; chi(2) = 5.22; P =.02), "Questioned God's love for me" (RR for death, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.02-1.43; chi(2) = 3.69; P =.05), and "Decided the devil made this happen" (RR for death, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.33; chi(2) = 5.84; P =.02). CONCLUSIONS: Certain forms of religiousness may increase the risk of death. Elderly ill men and women who experience a religious struggle with their illness appear to be at increased risk of death, even after controlling for baseline health, mental health status, and demographic factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.161.15.1881

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A systematic review and two meta-analyses have confirmed the relationship between R/S and longer survival.

    “Another systematic review [570] and two meta-analyses [571, 572] have confirmed this relationship between R/S and longer survival.”
  • Across the three reviews, survival among frequent attendees was increased on average by 37%, 43%, and 30%, with a mean effect of 37%.

    “Survival among frequent attendees was increased on average by 37%, 43%, and 30% (mean effect being 37% across these reviews).”
  • In these three reviews, the effects on survival have been particularly strong for frequency of attendance at religious services.

    “The effects have been particularly strong for frequency of attendance at religious services in these three reviews.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., Tarakeshwar, N., & Hahn, J.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2001-08-13
Volume
161
Issue
15
Pages
1881
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033090463
Cited by
759
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 43
FWCI
47.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Retirement Research Foundation
  • Bowling Green State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
religious struggle, mortality, religious coping, elderly patients, religion and illness
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Disease, Female, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Predictive Value of Tests, Religion, Stress, Psychological, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review