Cited by 46Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Relationship of amotivation to neurocognition, self-efficacy and functioning in first-episode psychosis: a structural equation modeling approach

Chang, W. C., Kwong, V. W. Y., Hui, C. L. M., Chan, S. K. W., Lee, E. H. M., Chen, E. Y. H.·2017·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background Better understanding of the complex interplay among key determinants of functional outcome is crucial to promoting recovery in psychotic disorders. However, this is understudied in the early course of illness. We aimed to examine the relationships among negative symptoms, neurocognition, general self-efficacy and global functioning in first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients using structural equation modeling (SEM). Method Three hundred and twenty-one Chinese patients aged 26-55 years presenting with FEP to an early intervention program in Hong Kong were recruited. Assessments encompassing symptom profiles, functioning, perceived general self-efficacy and a battery of neurocognitive tests were conducted. Negative symptom measurement was subdivided into amotivation and diminished expression (DE) domain scores based on the ratings in the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms. Results An initial SEM model showed no significant association between functioning and DE which was removed from further analysis. A final trimmed model yielded very good model fit (χ2 = 15.48, p = 0.63; comparative fit index = 1.00; root mean square error of approximation Conclusion Our results indicate a critical intermediary role of amotivation in linking neurocognitive impairment to functioning in FEP. General self-efficacy may represent a promising treatment target for improvement of motivational deficits and functional outcome in the early illness stage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291716003044

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-perception factors such as self-esteem, self-efficacy and internalised stigma are associated with poor social functioning in psychosis.

    “Self‐perception factors included self‐esteem (Lysaker et al. 2007), self‐efficacy (Chang et al. 2017) and internalised stigma (Hill and Startup 2013; Lysaker et al. 2007).”

    From Social Functioning Interventions in Psychosis: A Systematic Review. (2025) · cites this paper as Chang et al. 2017

  • Deficits in social cognition, theory of mind (ToM) and neurocognition are associated with poor social functioning in psychosis.

    “the factors that were associated with poor social functioning (see Table 5) included deficits in social cognition (Addington et al. 2006; García‐López et al. 2022; Woolverton et al. 2018), ToM (Sullivan et al. 2013, 2014) and neurocognition (Chang et al. 2017)”

    From Social Functioning Interventions in Psychosis: A Systematic Review. (2025) · cites this paper as Chang et al. 2017

  • Behavioural factors such as poor motivation, social relatedness and avoidance of goal-directed activity are associated with poor social functioning in psychosis.

    “Behavioural factors included poor motivation (Chang et al. 2017; Moe et al. 2021), social relatedness (González‐Blanch et al. 2020) and avoidance of goal‐directed activity (Schlosser et al. 2015).”

    From Social Functioning Interventions in Psychosis: A Systematic Review. (2025) · cites this paper as Chang et al. 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, W. C., Kwong, V. W. Y., Hui, C. L. M., Chan, S. K. W., Lee, E. H. M., & Chen, E. Y. H.
Affiliations
Queen Mary Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Chang, W. C.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2016-11-21
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
755-765
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2551401227
Cited by
46
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
amotivation, first-episode psychosis, neurocognitive function, general self-efficacy, global functioning, negative symptoms, mediation, functional outcome, early intervention, motivational deficits
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Psychotic Disorders, Models, Statistical, Self Efficacy, Apathy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review