Cited by 187Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryMental Health and Patient Involvement

Recovery from schizophrenia: is it possible?

Vita, Antonio, Barlati, Stefano·2018·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Schizophrenia has a heterogeneous range of end states, from severe cases requiring repeated hospitalization to cases in which a single illness episode is followed by complete remission. The purpose of the present review is to examine recent literature on recovery in schizophrenia, focusing on the predictive factors and on the possibility to achieve it. RECENT FINDINGS: Roughly half of schizophrenia patients recovered or significantly improved over the long term, suggesting that functional remission is possible. Several factors predict the course of schizophrenia, including demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics, as well as socioeconomic variables. Antipsychotics are a fundamental element of schizophrenia treatment, although the available antipsychotics have significant limitations. In this context, psychosocial interventions are supported by substantial evidence of efficacy in many outcome measures and rehabilitation interventions should be considered as an evidence-based practice and need to become a part of the standard treatment of schizophrenia. SUMMARY: As recovery is a multidimensional concept, some authors suggested that at least two areas should be taken into account: clinical remission and social functioning. Functional outcome should be a priority target for therapeutic interventions in schizophrenia and in this perspective measuring treatment response, remission and functional recovery is essential. Only an integrated and multifaceted approach involving pharmacotherapy, psychosocial interventions, and attention to environmental circumstances can improve outcome in schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0000000000000407

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vita, A., & Barlati, S.
Affiliations
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT)
Corresponding author
Vita, Antonio
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2018-05
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
246-255
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789223245
Cited by
187
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
schizophrenia, recovery, functional remission, social functioning, clinical remission, predictive factors, antipsychotic drugs, psychosocial interventions, rehabilitation, treatment response, socioeconomic factors
MeSH terms
Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Humans, Prognosis, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Antipsychotic Agents, Recovery of Function, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review