Cited by 101Eating Disorders and BehaviorsMental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A comparative network analysis of eating disorder psychopathology and co-occurring depression and anxiety symptoms before and after treatment

Open access
Smith, Kathryn E., Mason, Tyler B., Crosby, Ross D., Cao, Li, Leonard, Rachel C., Wetterneck, Chad T., Smith, Brad E. R., Farrell, Nicholas R. +3 more·2019·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Network analysis is an emerging approach in the study of psychopathology, yet few applications have been seen in eating disorders (EDs). Furthermore, little research exists regarding changes in network strength after interventions. Therefore the present study examined the network structures of ED and co-occurring depression and anxiety symptoms before and after treatment for EDs. Method: Participants from residential or partial hospital ED treatment programs ( N = 446) completed assessments upon admission and discharge. Networks were estimated using regularized Graphical Gaussian Models using 38 items from the Eating Disorders Examination-Questionnaire, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Results: ED symptoms with high centrality indices included a desire to lose weight, guilt about eating, shape overvaluation, and wanting an empty stomach, while restlessness, self-esteem, lack of energy, and feeling overwhelmed bridged ED to depression and anxiety symptoms. Comparisons between admission and discharge networks indicated the global network strength did not change significantly, though symptom severity decreased. Participants with denser networks at admission evidenced less change in ED symptomatology during treatment. Conclusions: Findings suggest that symptoms related to shape and weight concerns and guilt are central ED symptoms, while physical symptoms, self-esteem, and feeling overwhelmed are links that may underlie comorbidities in EDs. Results provided some support for the validity of network approaches, in that admission networks conveyed prognostic information. However, the lack of correspondence between symptom reduction and change in network strength indicates that future research is needed to examine network dynamics in the context of intervention and relapse prevention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291718000867

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improvement in one set of symptoms often results in the resolution of or improvement in related symptoms of other disorders.

    “It is well known that improvement in one set of symptoms often results in the resolution of or improvement in related symptoms of other disorders, which exist in a network with each other (see #10 in Figure 1) (147, 236–238).”

    From The integrated treatment of eating disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychiatric comorbidity: a commentary on the evolution of principles and guidelines (2023) · cites this paper as [237]

    The Treatment Outcome and Network Analysis section describes links among eating-disorder, depression, and anxiety symptoms and proposes that targeting those links may reduce psychopathology (page unavailable). But the Discussion reports that symptom improvement did not correspond to changes in network connectivity and says the causal influence of connected symptoms remains unclear. The paper therefore does not establish that improvement in one disorder’s symptoms often causes improvement or resolution of another’s. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, K. E., Mason, T. B., Crosby, R. D., Cao, L., Leonard, R. C., Wetterneck, C. T., Smith, B. E. R., Farrell, N. R., Riemann, B. C., Wonderlich, S. A., & Moessner, M.
Affiliations
  • University of North Dakota (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Neuropsychiatric Research Institute (US)
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Smith, Kathryn E.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2018-04-15
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
314-324
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2800157145
Cited by
101
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH082761)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
eating disorders, depression, anxiety, symptom networks, network centrality, comorbidities, residential treatment, partial hospitalization, treatment outcomes, weight concern, self-esteem, network dynamics, relapse prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Statistical, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review